在子宫输卵管造影中,内渗不仅是输卵管病变的并发症,也是一种新的放射学发现。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Cemil Gürses, Koray Kaya Kılıç, Alpaslan Yavuz, İclal Erdem Toslak, Ender Uysal, Berkan Sayal, Dilek Yapar
{"title":"在子宫输卵管造影中,内渗不仅是输卵管病变的并发症,也是一种新的放射学发现。","authors":"Cemil Gürses, Koray Kaya Kılıç, Alpaslan Yavuz, İclal Erdem Toslak, Ender Uysal, Berkan Sayal, Dilek Yapar","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqaf199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hysterosalpingography (HSG) remains the first-line imaging technique for assessing fallopian tube conditions due to its accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and high diagnostic accuracy. Intravasation, the leakage of contrast media into myometrial or vascular structures during HSG, has been documented as a complication.This study aimed to determine the prevalence of intravasation, explore the relationship between intravasation and tubal occlusion, and assess the applicability of grading intravasation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 3,032 HSG examinations performed between January 2021 and May 2024 was conducted. Intravasation, tubal occlusion, and related findings were recorded using standard X-ray equipment and categorised prospectively. Statistical analysis included logistic regression to identify predictors of tubal occlusion and inter-observer agreement using Fleiss Kappa. Diagnostic metrics for intravasation as a radiological marker of tubal occlusion were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intravasation was observed in 2.6% of cases. Among cases with tubal occlusion, 16.4% exhibited intravasation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of intravasation for detecting tubal occlusion were 14.5%, 99.8%, 92.3%, and 85.6%, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios indicated that intravasation increased the likelihood of tubal occlusion approximately 55-fold. Inter-observer agreement for intravasation detection was almost perfect (Kappa = 0.97). Limitations included the absence of oil-based contrast and a pressure manometer during contrast infusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravasation, traditionally viewed as a complication, emerges as a significant radiological indicator of tubal occlusion. Incorporating intravasation characteristics, such as initiation time, into grading systems may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further refinement of classification systems and broader clinical validation are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravasation is not only a complication but also a novel radiological finding for tubal pathologies in hysterosalpingography.\",\"authors\":\"Cemil Gürses, Koray Kaya Kılıç, Alpaslan Yavuz, İclal Erdem Toslak, Ender Uysal, Berkan Sayal, Dilek Yapar\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjr/tqaf199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Hysterosalpingography (HSG) remains the first-line imaging technique for assessing fallopian tube conditions due to its accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and high diagnostic accuracy. Intravasation, the leakage of contrast media into myometrial or vascular structures during HSG, has been documented as a complication.This study aimed to determine the prevalence of intravasation, explore the relationship between intravasation and tubal occlusion, and assess the applicability of grading intravasation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of 3,032 HSG examinations performed between January 2021 and May 2024 was conducted. Intravasation, tubal occlusion, and related findings were recorded using standard X-ray equipment and categorised prospectively. Statistical analysis included logistic regression to identify predictors of tubal occlusion and inter-observer agreement using Fleiss Kappa. Diagnostic metrics for intravasation as a radiological marker of tubal occlusion were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intravasation was observed in 2.6% of cases. Among cases with tubal occlusion, 16.4% exhibited intravasation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of intravasation for detecting tubal occlusion were 14.5%, 99.8%, 92.3%, and 85.6%, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios indicated that intravasation increased the likelihood of tubal occlusion approximately 55-fold. Inter-observer agreement for intravasation detection was almost perfect (Kappa = 0.97). Limitations included the absence of oil-based contrast and a pressure manometer during contrast infusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intravasation, traditionally viewed as a complication, emerges as a significant radiological indicator of tubal occlusion. Incorporating intravasation characteristics, such as initiation time, into grading systems may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further refinement of classification systems and broader clinical validation are recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqaf199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:子宫输卵管造影(HSG)由于其可及性、成本效益和高诊断准确性,仍然是评估输卵管状况的一线成像技术。血管内渗,造影剂渗漏到子宫肌瘤或血管结构中,已被证明是一种并发症。本研究旨在确定内渗的患病率,探讨内渗与输卵管阻塞的关系,并评估内渗分级的适用性。方法:对2021年1月至2024年5月进行的3032例输卵管造影检查进行回顾性分析。使用标准x线设备记录内渗、输卵管阻塞及相关发现,并进行前瞻性分类。统计分析包括使用Fleiss Kappa进行逻辑回归以确定输卵管阻塞的预测因素和观察者间的一致性。计算了作为输卵管阻塞放射学标志物的内渗诊断指标。结果:2.6%的病例出现内渗。在输卵管阻塞的病例中,16.4%表现为内渗。静脉穿刺检测输卵管阻塞的敏感性为14.5%,特异性为99.8%,阳性预测值为92.3%,阴性预测值为85.6%。调整后的优势比表明,内渗使输卵管阻塞的可能性增加了约55倍。观察者间对内渗检测的一致性几乎是完美的(Kappa = 0.97)。局限性包括在注射造影剂时缺乏油基造影剂和压力计。结论:传统上被认为是一种并发症的内渗,现在成为输卵管阻塞的重要放射学指标。将内渗特征(如起始时间)纳入分级系统可提高诊断的准确性。建议进一步完善分类系统和更广泛的临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravasation is not only a complication but also a novel radiological finding for tubal pathologies in hysterosalpingography.

Objectives: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) remains the first-line imaging technique for assessing fallopian tube conditions due to its accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and high diagnostic accuracy. Intravasation, the leakage of contrast media into myometrial or vascular structures during HSG, has been documented as a complication.This study aimed to determine the prevalence of intravasation, explore the relationship between intravasation and tubal occlusion, and assess the applicability of grading intravasation.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of 3,032 HSG examinations performed between January 2021 and May 2024 was conducted. Intravasation, tubal occlusion, and related findings were recorded using standard X-ray equipment and categorised prospectively. Statistical analysis included logistic regression to identify predictors of tubal occlusion and inter-observer agreement using Fleiss Kappa. Diagnostic metrics for intravasation as a radiological marker of tubal occlusion were calculated.

Results: Intravasation was observed in 2.6% of cases. Among cases with tubal occlusion, 16.4% exhibited intravasation. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of intravasation for detecting tubal occlusion were 14.5%, 99.8%, 92.3%, and 85.6%, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios indicated that intravasation increased the likelihood of tubal occlusion approximately 55-fold. Inter-observer agreement for intravasation detection was almost perfect (Kappa = 0.97). Limitations included the absence of oil-based contrast and a pressure manometer during contrast infusion.

Conclusion: Intravasation, traditionally viewed as a complication, emerges as a significant radiological indicator of tubal occlusion. Incorporating intravasation characteristics, such as initiation time, into grading systems may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further refinement of classification systems and broader clinical validation are recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信