自我伤害社区门诊心理治疗参与服务(COPESS)的可行性和可接受性:随机对照试验

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Pooja Saini, Anna Hunt, Caroline Clements, Mark Gabbay, Catherine Mills, Kari Kvamme-Mitchell, Naheed Tahir, Helen Mulholland, Cecil Kullu, Mark Hann, Rui Duarte, Andrea Murphy, Else Guthrie, Peter Taylor
{"title":"自我伤害社区门诊心理治疗参与服务(COPESS)的可行性和可接受性:随机对照试验","authors":"Pooja Saini, Anna Hunt, Caroline Clements, Mark Gabbay, Catherine Mills, Kari Kvamme-Mitchell, Naheed Tahir, Helen Mulholland, Cecil Kullu, Mark Hann, Rui Duarte, Andrea Murphy, Else Guthrie, Peter Taylor","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2025.10780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-harm is widespread and often occurs in the community without resulting in hospital presentation. Individuals with depressive symptoms are at elevated risk. There are limited self-harm interventions designed for community and primary care settings. The Community Outpatient Psychological Engagement Service for Self-harm (COPESS) is a brief talking therapy intervention for self-harm based in community settings.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the feasibility of evaluating the COPESS intervention in a community setting in relation to participant recruitment, retention, data collection and the acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used a mixed-method approach and a single-blind randomised controlled trial design with 1:1 allocation to either COPESS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Adults with depressive symptoms and self-harm in the past 6 months were recruited from general practices. Secondary outcome measures were assessed at baseline and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after randomisation. The trial was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04191122) on 9 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five people were randomised (of an initial target of 60). Retention rates at follow-up assessments were high (>75%), as was attendance by all participants for all therapy sessions (93%). At 3 months, there were trends towards lower levels of self-harm urges, depressive symptoms and distress in the COPESS group compared with controls. Fidelity to the manualised COPESS therapy was moderate to high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All progression criteria were met, supporting further evaluation of the intervention in a full-scale efficacy and/or cost-effectiveness trial. These findings add to the growing evidence base supporting the utility of brief psychological interventions for self-harm. COPESS has potential as a brief primary-care-based intervention for those struggling with self-harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 5","pages":"e190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and acceptability of the Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement Service for Self-harm (COPESS): randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Saini, Anna Hunt, Caroline Clements, Mark Gabbay, Catherine Mills, Kari Kvamme-Mitchell, Naheed Tahir, Helen Mulholland, Cecil Kullu, Mark Hann, Rui Duarte, Andrea Murphy, Else Guthrie, Peter Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/bjo.2025.10780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-harm is widespread and often occurs in the community without resulting in hospital presentation. Individuals with depressive symptoms are at elevated risk. There are limited self-harm interventions designed for community and primary care settings. The Community Outpatient Psychological Engagement Service for Self-harm (COPESS) is a brief talking therapy intervention for self-harm based in community settings.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the feasibility of evaluating the COPESS intervention in a community setting in relation to participant recruitment, retention, data collection and the acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used a mixed-method approach and a single-blind randomised controlled trial design with 1:1 allocation to either COPESS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Adults with depressive symptoms and self-harm in the past 6 months were recruited from general practices. Secondary outcome measures were assessed at baseline and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after randomisation. The trial was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04191122) on 9 December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five people were randomised (of an initial target of 60). Retention rates at follow-up assessments were high (>75%), as was attendance by all participants for all therapy sessions (93%). At 3 months, there were trends towards lower levels of self-harm urges, depressive symptoms and distress in the COPESS group compared with controls. Fidelity to the manualised COPESS therapy was moderate to high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All progression criteria were met, supporting further evaluation of the intervention in a full-scale efficacy and/or cost-effectiveness trial. These findings add to the growing evidence base supporting the utility of brief psychological interventions for self-harm. COPESS has potential as a brief primary-care-based intervention for those struggling with self-harm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"e190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451733/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJPsych Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10780\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10780","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自残是一种广泛存在的现象,经常发生在社区而不需要住院治疗。有抑郁症状的人风险更高。为社区和初级保健机构设计的自我伤害干预措施有限。社区门诊自我伤害心理参与服务(COPESS)是一种基于社区设置的自我伤害简短谈话治疗干预。目的:评估在社区环境中评估COPESS干预的可行性,包括参与者的招募、保留、数据收集和干预的可接受性。方法:我们采用混合方法和单盲随机对照试验设计,以1:1的比例分配到COPESS加常规治疗或单独常规治疗。过去6个月有抑郁症状和自残的成年人从全科医院招募。在基线和随机化后1个月、2个月和3个月评估次要结局指标。该试验已于2019年12月9日在clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04191122)上进行预注册。结果:55人被随机分配(初始目标为60人)。随访评估的保留率很高(约75%),所有参与者在所有治疗阶段的出勤率也很高(93%)。在3个月时,与对照组相比,COPESS组的自残冲动、抑郁症状和痛苦程度有降低的趋势。对手动COPESS治疗的忠实度为中至高。结论:所有进展标准均得到满足,支持在全面疗效和/或成本效益试验中进一步评估干预措施。这些发现增加了越来越多的证据基础,支持简短的心理干预对自残的效用。COPESS有潜力作为一种以初级保健为基础的干预措施,为那些挣扎于自我伤害的人提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and acceptability of the Community Outpatient Psychotherapy Engagement Service for Self-harm (COPESS): randomised controlled trial.

Background: Self-harm is widespread and often occurs in the community without resulting in hospital presentation. Individuals with depressive symptoms are at elevated risk. There are limited self-harm interventions designed for community and primary care settings. The Community Outpatient Psychological Engagement Service for Self-harm (COPESS) is a brief talking therapy intervention for self-harm based in community settings.

Aims: To assess the feasibility of evaluating the COPESS intervention in a community setting in relation to participant recruitment, retention, data collection and the acceptability of the intervention.

Method: We used a mixed-method approach and a single-blind randomised controlled trial design with 1:1 allocation to either COPESS plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Adults with depressive symptoms and self-harm in the past 6 months were recruited from general practices. Secondary outcome measures were assessed at baseline and 1 month, 2 months and 3 months after randomisation. The trial was pre-registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04191122) on 9 December 2019.

Results: Fifty-five people were randomised (of an initial target of 60). Retention rates at follow-up assessments were high (>75%), as was attendance by all participants for all therapy sessions (93%). At 3 months, there were trends towards lower levels of self-harm urges, depressive symptoms and distress in the COPESS group compared with controls. Fidelity to the manualised COPESS therapy was moderate to high.

Conclusions: All progression criteria were met, supporting further evaluation of the intervention in a full-scale efficacy and/or cost-effectiveness trial. These findings add to the growing evidence base supporting the utility of brief psychological interventions for self-harm. COPESS has potential as a brief primary-care-based intervention for those struggling with self-harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信