轻、中度智障或边缘性智障人士认知信任问卷的心理测量特征

IF 1.9 3区医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2025-08-21 DOI:10.1111/jar.70111

Suzanne D. M. Derks, Annelies de Bildt, Veerle M. M. Andries, Saskia Knapen, Paula S. Sterkenburg

{"title":"轻、中度智障或边缘性智障人士认知信任问卷的心理测量特征","authors":"Suzanne D. M. Derks, Annelies de Bildt, Veerle M. M. Andries, Saskia Knapen, Paula S. Sterkenburg","doi":"10.1111/jar.70111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>To assess epistemic trust in people with intellectual disabilities, we adapted the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust (QET) for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning (MMID/BIF).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated the factor structure, the reliability and construct validity in 147 adults.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We replicated the 4-factor structure, after excluding four items with low factor loadings. Internal consistency was <i>α</i> = 0.58 for Hypervigilance, and ranged from <i>α</i> = 0.74 to 0.81 for the other subscales. Subscale test–retest reliability ranged from 0.504 to 0.747. No convergent validity was found with the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ). Discriminant validity was confirmed with the Scale of Emotional Development-Questionnaire (SED-Q), Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) and Autism Spectrum Quotient-10 (AQ-10), but not with General Social Trust (GST).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The QET is promising for assessing epistemic trust of people with MMID/BIF at subscale level. Refining the items with a figurative expression seems needed.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"38 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70111","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust in People With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities or Borderline Intellectual Functioning\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne D. M. Derks, Annelies de Bildt, Veerle M. M. Andries, Saskia Knapen, Paula S. Sterkenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jar.70111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess epistemic trust in people with intellectual disabilities, we adapted the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust (QET) for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning (MMID/BIF).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>We investigated the factor structure, the reliability and construct validity in 147 adults.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We replicated the 4-factor structure, after excluding four items with low factor loadings. Internal consistency was <i>α</i> = 0.58 for Hypervigilance, and ranged from <i>α</i> = 0.74 to 0.81 for the other subscales. Subscale test–retest reliability ranged from 0.504 to 0.747. No convergent validity was found with the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ). Discriminant validity was confirmed with the Scale of Emotional Development-Questionnaire (SED-Q), Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) and Autism Spectrum Quotient-10 (AQ-10), but not with General Social Trust (GST).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The QET is promising for assessing epistemic trust of people with MMID/BIF at subscale level. Refining the items with a figurative expression seems needed.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jar.70111\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jar.70111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景为了评估智力残疾者的认知信任，我们将认知信任问卷（QET）应用于轻度至中度智力残疾或边缘性智力功能（MMID/BIF）人群。方法对147名成人进行因素结构、信度和结构效度调查。结果在剔除4个低因子负荷项目后，重复了4因子结构。高警惕性的内部一致性为α = 0.58，其他分量表的内部一致性为α = 0.74 ~ 0.81。分量表测试-重测信度范围为0.504 ~ 0.747。反思性功能问卷（RFQ）没有发现收敛效度。情绪发展量表-问卷（SED-Q）、情绪发展短量表（SED-S）和自闭症谱系商-10 （AQ-10）均具有判别效度，而一般社会信任量表（GST）不具有判别效度。QET有望在子尺度水平上评估MMID/BIF患者的认知信任。似乎需要用一种比喻的表达来精炼这些项目。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Psychometric Properties of the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust in People With Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities or Borderline Intellectual Functioning

Background

To assess epistemic trust in people with intellectual disabilities, we adapted the Questionnaire Epistemic Trust (QET) for people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities or borderline intellectual functioning (MMID/BIF).

Method

We investigated the factor structure, the reliability and construct validity in 147 adults.

Results

We replicated the 4-factor structure, after excluding four items with low factor loadings. Internal consistency was α = 0.58 for Hypervigilance, and ranged from α = 0.74 to 0.81 for the other subscales. Subscale test–retest reliability ranged from 0.504 to 0.747. No convergent validity was found with the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (RFQ). Discriminant validity was confirmed with the Scale of Emotional Development-Questionnaire (SED-Q), Scale of Emotional Development-Short (SED-S) and Autism Spectrum Quotient-10 (AQ-10), but not with General Social Trust (GST).

Discussion

The QET is promising for assessing epistemic trust of people with MMID/BIF at subscale level. Refining the items with a figurative expression seems needed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities Multiple-

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： JARID is an international, peer-reviewed journal which draws together findings derived from original applied research in intellectual disabilities. The journal is an important forum for the dissemination of ideas to promote valued lifestyles for people with intellectual disabilities. It reports on research from the UK and overseas by authors from all relevant professional disciplines. It is aimed at an international, multi-disciplinary readership. Topics covered include community living, quality of life, challenging behaviour, communication, sexuality, medication, ageing, supported employment, family issues, mental health, physical health, autism, economic issues, social networks, staff stress, staff training, epidemiology and service provision.