巴西生物乙醇作物的区域N2O排放因子:进展和数据缺口

IF 4.1 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Graciele Angnes, João Luis Nunes Carvalho, Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri, Maurício Roberto Cherubin
{"title":"巴西生物乙醇作物的区域N2O排放因子:进展和数据缺口","authors":"Graciele Angnes,&nbsp;João Luis Nunes Carvalho,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri,&nbsp;Maurício Roberto Cherubin","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recognition of bioethanol as a key strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is closely linked to the accuracy of N<sub>2</sub>O emission factors (EF) used in life cycle assessments. However, previous studies have shown that the default N<sub>2</sub>O EF values recommended by the IPCC do not accurately reflect the diverse edaphoclimatic conditions found in Brazil, leading to uncertainties in GHG inventories. Therefore, establishing regional N<sub>2</sub>O EF is essential for improving the precision of bioethanol emission estimates. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review compiling 293 measurements from 45 field studies across different regions of Brazil. This study focuses on sugarcane (20 studies) and corn (25 studies), which are the primary crops used for bioethanol production in Brazil. Our findings indicate that the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF for these crops is 0.72%, lower than the value reported for the tropics and sub-tropics (1.6%). When analyzed separately, sugarcane showed an average N<sub>2</sub>O EF of 0.65%, with higher emissions from the combined use of mineral and organic N fertilizers (0.79%) compared to mineral (0.55%) or organic fertilizers alone (0.77%). For corn, the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF was 0.84%, with mineral N fertilizers presenting the lowest EF (0.40%), while emissions increased with the combination of mineral and organic sources (0.82%), reaching the highest levels with pig slurry application (1.72%). These variations highlight the limitations of using IPCC default values for mineral and organic N fertilizers in Brazil. Our results reinforce the need for Tier 2 methodologies incorporating region-specific data to enhance GHG inventory accuracy and support targeted mitigation strategies. Although Brazil's latitudinal range spans tropical and subtropical zones, regional stratification was not applied due to the limited number of studies within each climate category, especially when further disaggregated by crop type and N fertilizer source. Despite covering key crops, fertilizer types, and multiple biomes, the current dataset still lacks representation for important agricultural regions such as Brazil's midwest, north, and northeast regions. This study represents a significant step toward refining N<sub>2</sub>O EF estimates for bioethanol crops, contributing to more precise assessments of the sector's climate impact. However, further research is needed to cover underrepresented areas, understand long-term field dynamics, and evaluate other crop systems and management practices. Future studies should also incorporate modeling tools and real-time monitoring to reduce uncertainties and support the development of Tier 3 estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional N2O Emission Factors From Bioethanol Crops in Brazil: Advances and Data Gaps\",\"authors\":\"Graciele Angnes,&nbsp;João Luis Nunes Carvalho,&nbsp;Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri,&nbsp;Maurício Roberto Cherubin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The recognition of bioethanol as a key strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is closely linked to the accuracy of N<sub>2</sub>O emission factors (EF) used in life cycle assessments. However, previous studies have shown that the default N<sub>2</sub>O EF values recommended by the IPCC do not accurately reflect the diverse edaphoclimatic conditions found in Brazil, leading to uncertainties in GHG inventories. Therefore, establishing regional N<sub>2</sub>O EF is essential for improving the precision of bioethanol emission estimates. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review compiling 293 measurements from 45 field studies across different regions of Brazil. This study focuses on sugarcane (20 studies) and corn (25 studies), which are the primary crops used for bioethanol production in Brazil. Our findings indicate that the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF for these crops is 0.72%, lower than the value reported for the tropics and sub-tropics (1.6%). When analyzed separately, sugarcane showed an average N<sub>2</sub>O EF of 0.65%, with higher emissions from the combined use of mineral and organic N fertilizers (0.79%) compared to mineral (0.55%) or organic fertilizers alone (0.77%). For corn, the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF was 0.84%, with mineral N fertilizers presenting the lowest EF (0.40%), while emissions increased with the combination of mineral and organic sources (0.82%), reaching the highest levels with pig slurry application (1.72%). These variations highlight the limitations of using IPCC default values for mineral and organic N fertilizers in Brazil. Our results reinforce the need for Tier 2 methodologies incorporating region-specific data to enhance GHG inventory accuracy and support targeted mitigation strategies. Although Brazil's latitudinal range spans tropical and subtropical zones, regional stratification was not applied due to the limited number of studies within each climate category, especially when further disaggregated by crop type and N fertilizer source. Despite covering key crops, fertilizer types, and multiple biomes, the current dataset still lacks representation for important agricultural regions such as Brazil's midwest, north, and northeast regions. This study represents a significant step toward refining N<sub>2</sub>O EF estimates for bioethanol crops, contributing to more precise assessments of the sector's climate impact. However, further research is needed to cover underrepresented areas, understand long-term field dynamics, and evaluate other crop systems and management practices. Future studies should also incorporate modeling tools and real-time monitoring to reduce uncertainties and support the development of Tier 3 estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70071\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认识到生物乙醇是减少温室气体(GHG)排放的关键战略,与生命周期评估中使用的N2O排放因子(EF)的准确性密切相关。然而,先前的研究表明,IPCC推荐的N2O EF默认值不能准确反映巴西的不同气候条件,导致温室气体清单存在不确定性。因此,建立区域N2O EF对于提高生物乙醇排放估算的精度至关重要。在这项研究中,我们进行了系统的文献综述,汇编了来自巴西不同地区45个实地研究的293项测量结果。这项研究的重点是甘蔗(20项研究)和玉米(25项研究),它们是巴西用于生物乙醇生产的主要作物。我们的研究结果表明,这些作物的平均N2O EF为0.72%,低于热带和亚热带的报告值(1.6%)。当单独分析时,甘蔗的平均N2O EF为0.65%,与矿肥(0.55%)或有机肥(0.77%)相比,矿肥和有机肥联合施用的排放量(0.79%)更高。玉米氮肥的平均排放系数为0.84%,其中矿质氮肥的排放系数最低(0.40%),而矿质氮肥和有机氮肥的混合排放使氮肥的排放量增加(0.82%),其中猪浆的排放最高(1.72%)。这些变化突出了在巴西使用IPCC的无机氮和有机氮肥料默认值的局限性。我们的研究结果表明,需要采用纳入特定区域数据的第2层方法,以提高温室气体清单的准确性,并支持有针对性的缓解战略。尽管巴西的纬度范围横跨热带和亚热带,但由于每个气候类别的研究数量有限,特别是在按作物类型和氮肥来源进一步细分时,没有采用区域分层。尽管涵盖了主要作物、肥料类型和多种生物群系,但目前的数据集仍然缺乏对巴西中西部、北部和东北部等重要农业地区的代表性。这项研究代表了提炼生物乙醇作物N2O EF估算的重要一步,有助于更准确地评估该行业的气候影响。然而,需要进一步的研究来覆盖代表性不足的地区,了解长期的田间动态,并评估其他作物系统和管理实践。未来的研究还应纳入建模工具和实时监测,以减少不确定性,并支持第三层估算的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Regional N2O Emission Factors From Bioethanol Crops in Brazil: Advances and Data Gaps

Regional N2O Emission Factors From Bioethanol Crops in Brazil: Advances and Data Gaps

The recognition of bioethanol as a key strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is closely linked to the accuracy of N2O emission factors (EF) used in life cycle assessments. However, previous studies have shown that the default N2O EF values recommended by the IPCC do not accurately reflect the diverse edaphoclimatic conditions found in Brazil, leading to uncertainties in GHG inventories. Therefore, establishing regional N2O EF is essential for improving the precision of bioethanol emission estimates. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review compiling 293 measurements from 45 field studies across different regions of Brazil. This study focuses on sugarcane (20 studies) and corn (25 studies), which are the primary crops used for bioethanol production in Brazil. Our findings indicate that the average N2O EF for these crops is 0.72%, lower than the value reported for the tropics and sub-tropics (1.6%). When analyzed separately, sugarcane showed an average N2O EF of 0.65%, with higher emissions from the combined use of mineral and organic N fertilizers (0.79%) compared to mineral (0.55%) or organic fertilizers alone (0.77%). For corn, the average N2O EF was 0.84%, with mineral N fertilizers presenting the lowest EF (0.40%), while emissions increased with the combination of mineral and organic sources (0.82%), reaching the highest levels with pig slurry application (1.72%). These variations highlight the limitations of using IPCC default values for mineral and organic N fertilizers in Brazil. Our results reinforce the need for Tier 2 methodologies incorporating region-specific data to enhance GHG inventory accuracy and support targeted mitigation strategies. Although Brazil's latitudinal range spans tropical and subtropical zones, regional stratification was not applied due to the limited number of studies within each climate category, especially when further disaggregated by crop type and N fertilizer source. Despite covering key crops, fertilizer types, and multiple biomes, the current dataset still lacks representation for important agricultural regions such as Brazil's midwest, north, and northeast regions. This study represents a significant step toward refining N2O EF estimates for bioethanol crops, contributing to more precise assessments of the sector's climate impact. However, further research is needed to cover underrepresented areas, understand long-term field dynamics, and evaluate other crop systems and management practices. Future studies should also incorporate modeling tools and real-time monitoring to reduce uncertainties and support the development of Tier 3 estimates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信