Graciele Angnes, João Luis Nunes Carvalho, Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri, Maurício Roberto Cherubin
{"title":"巴西生物乙醇作物的区域N2O排放因子:进展和数据缺口","authors":"Graciele Angnes, João Luis Nunes Carvalho, Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri, Maurício Roberto Cherubin","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recognition of bioethanol as a key strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is closely linked to the accuracy of N<sub>2</sub>O emission factors (EF) used in life cycle assessments. However, previous studies have shown that the default N<sub>2</sub>O EF values recommended by the IPCC do not accurately reflect the diverse edaphoclimatic conditions found in Brazil, leading to uncertainties in GHG inventories. Therefore, establishing regional N<sub>2</sub>O EF is essential for improving the precision of bioethanol emission estimates. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review compiling 293 measurements from 45 field studies across different regions of Brazil. This study focuses on sugarcane (20 studies) and corn (25 studies), which are the primary crops used for bioethanol production in Brazil. Our findings indicate that the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF for these crops is 0.72%, lower than the value reported for the tropics and sub-tropics (1.6%). When analyzed separately, sugarcane showed an average N<sub>2</sub>O EF of 0.65%, with higher emissions from the combined use of mineral and organic N fertilizers (0.79%) compared to mineral (0.55%) or organic fertilizers alone (0.77%). For corn, the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF was 0.84%, with mineral N fertilizers presenting the lowest EF (0.40%), while emissions increased with the combination of mineral and organic sources (0.82%), reaching the highest levels with pig slurry application (1.72%). These variations highlight the limitations of using IPCC default values for mineral and organic N fertilizers in Brazil. Our results reinforce the need for Tier 2 methodologies incorporating region-specific data to enhance GHG inventory accuracy and support targeted mitigation strategies. Although Brazil's latitudinal range spans tropical and subtropical zones, regional stratification was not applied due to the limited number of studies within each climate category, especially when further disaggregated by crop type and N fertilizer source. Despite covering key crops, fertilizer types, and multiple biomes, the current dataset still lacks representation for important agricultural regions such as Brazil's midwest, north, and northeast regions. This study represents a significant step toward refining N<sub>2</sub>O EF estimates for bioethanol crops, contributing to more precise assessments of the sector's climate impact. However, further research is needed to cover underrepresented areas, understand long-term field dynamics, and evaluate other crop systems and management practices. Future studies should also incorporate modeling tools and real-time monitoring to reduce uncertainties and support the development of Tier 3 estimates.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70071","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional N2O Emission Factors From Bioethanol Crops in Brazil: Advances and Data Gaps\",\"authors\":\"Graciele Angnes, João Luis Nunes Carvalho, Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri, Maurício Roberto Cherubin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The recognition of bioethanol as a key strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is closely linked to the accuracy of N<sub>2</sub>O emission factors (EF) used in life cycle assessments. However, previous studies have shown that the default N<sub>2</sub>O EF values recommended by the IPCC do not accurately reflect the diverse edaphoclimatic conditions found in Brazil, leading to uncertainties in GHG inventories. Therefore, establishing regional N<sub>2</sub>O EF is essential for improving the precision of bioethanol emission estimates. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review compiling 293 measurements from 45 field studies across different regions of Brazil. This study focuses on sugarcane (20 studies) and corn (25 studies), which are the primary crops used for bioethanol production in Brazil. Our findings indicate that the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF for these crops is 0.72%, lower than the value reported for the tropics and sub-tropics (1.6%). When analyzed separately, sugarcane showed an average N<sub>2</sub>O EF of 0.65%, with higher emissions from the combined use of mineral and organic N fertilizers (0.79%) compared to mineral (0.55%) or organic fertilizers alone (0.77%). For corn, the average N<sub>2</sub>O EF was 0.84%, with mineral N fertilizers presenting the lowest EF (0.40%), while emissions increased with the combination of mineral and organic sources (0.82%), reaching the highest levels with pig slurry application (1.72%). These variations highlight the limitations of using IPCC default values for mineral and organic N fertilizers in Brazil. Our results reinforce the need for Tier 2 methodologies incorporating region-specific data to enhance GHG inventory accuracy and support targeted mitigation strategies. Although Brazil's latitudinal range spans tropical and subtropical zones, regional stratification was not applied due to the limited number of studies within each climate category, especially when further disaggregated by crop type and N fertilizer source. Despite covering key crops, fertilizer types, and multiple biomes, the current dataset still lacks representation for important agricultural regions such as Brazil's midwest, north, and northeast regions. This study represents a significant step toward refining N<sub>2</sub>O EF estimates for bioethanol crops, contributing to more precise assessments of the sector's climate impact. However, further research is needed to cover underrepresented areas, understand long-term field dynamics, and evaluate other crop systems and management practices. Future studies should also incorporate modeling tools and real-time monitoring to reduce uncertainties and support the development of Tier 3 estimates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70071\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Regional N2O Emission Factors From Bioethanol Crops in Brazil: Advances and Data Gaps
The recognition of bioethanol as a key strategy for mitigating greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is closely linked to the accuracy of N2O emission factors (EF) used in life cycle assessments. However, previous studies have shown that the default N2O EF values recommended by the IPCC do not accurately reflect the diverse edaphoclimatic conditions found in Brazil, leading to uncertainties in GHG inventories. Therefore, establishing regional N2O EF is essential for improving the precision of bioethanol emission estimates. In this study, we conducted a systematic literature review compiling 293 measurements from 45 field studies across different regions of Brazil. This study focuses on sugarcane (20 studies) and corn (25 studies), which are the primary crops used for bioethanol production in Brazil. Our findings indicate that the average N2O EF for these crops is 0.72%, lower than the value reported for the tropics and sub-tropics (1.6%). When analyzed separately, sugarcane showed an average N2O EF of 0.65%, with higher emissions from the combined use of mineral and organic N fertilizers (0.79%) compared to mineral (0.55%) or organic fertilizers alone (0.77%). For corn, the average N2O EF was 0.84%, with mineral N fertilizers presenting the lowest EF (0.40%), while emissions increased with the combination of mineral and organic sources (0.82%), reaching the highest levels with pig slurry application (1.72%). These variations highlight the limitations of using IPCC default values for mineral and organic N fertilizers in Brazil. Our results reinforce the need for Tier 2 methodologies incorporating region-specific data to enhance GHG inventory accuracy and support targeted mitigation strategies. Although Brazil's latitudinal range spans tropical and subtropical zones, regional stratification was not applied due to the limited number of studies within each climate category, especially when further disaggregated by crop type and N fertilizer source. Despite covering key crops, fertilizer types, and multiple biomes, the current dataset still lacks representation for important agricultural regions such as Brazil's midwest, north, and northeast regions. This study represents a significant step toward refining N2O EF estimates for bioethanol crops, contributing to more precise assessments of the sector's climate impact. However, further research is needed to cover underrepresented areas, understand long-term field dynamics, and evaluate other crop systems and management practices. Future studies should also incorporate modeling tools and real-time monitoring to reduce uncertainties and support the development of Tier 3 estimates.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.