Aapo Tikka, Muhammed Irfan, Tero Mielonen, Harri Kokkola, Anni Hartikainen, Olli Sippula, Antti Kilpeläinen
{"title":"芬兰不同木材利用情景下气溶胶排放的辐射强迫","authors":"Aapo Tikka, Muhammed Irfan, Tero Mielonen, Harri Kokkola, Anni Hartikainen, Olli Sippula, Antti Kilpeläinen","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Use of forest biomass may induce changes in the aerosol emissions, with subsequent impacts on the direct and indirect climate effects of these short-lived climate forcers. We studied how alternative wood use scenarios affected the aerosol emissions and consequent radiative forcing in Finland. In all alternative scenarios, the harvest level of forest biomass was increased by 10 million m<sup>3</sup> compared to the baseline. The increased biomass harvest was assigned to four different uses: (i) to sawn wood, (ii) to pulp-based products, (iii) to energy biomass combusted in small-scale appliances or (iv) to energy biomass combusted in medium-to-large scale boilers. Aerosol emissions (black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC) and sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>)) under these scenarios were estimated using displacement factors (DFs). The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ was used to study instantaneous radiative forcing due to aerosol–radiation interactions (IRF<sub>ARI</sub>) and effective radiative forcing (ERF), based on the differences in aerosol emissions between the alternative wood use scenarios and the baseline scenario. The results indicated that the use of sawn wood and energy biomass combusted in medium- to large-scale boilers decreased radiative forcings, implying climate cooling, whereas the increased use of pulpwood increased them. Energy biomass combustion in small-scale appliances increased IRF<sub>ARI</sub> by 0.004 W m<sup>−2</sup> but decreased ERF by −0.260 W m<sup>−2</sup>, specifically due to a strong increase in carbonaceous aerosols. Alternative use of forest biomass notably influenced aerosol emissions and their climate impacts, and it can be concluded that increased forest biomass use requires a comprehensive assessment of aerosol emissions alongside greenhouse gases (GHGs). Given the consequent reduction in radiative forcing from aerosol emissions, we conclude that the greatest overall climate benefits could be achieved by prioritising the production of long-lived wood-based products.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"17 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiative Forcing of Aerosol Emissions Under Alternative Wood Use Scenarios in Finland\",\"authors\":\"Aapo Tikka, Muhammed Irfan, Tero Mielonen, Harri Kokkola, Anni Hartikainen, Olli Sippula, Antti Kilpeläinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Use of forest biomass may induce changes in the aerosol emissions, with subsequent impacts on the direct and indirect climate effects of these short-lived climate forcers. We studied how alternative wood use scenarios affected the aerosol emissions and consequent radiative forcing in Finland. In all alternative scenarios, the harvest level of forest biomass was increased by 10 million m<sup>3</sup> compared to the baseline. The increased biomass harvest was assigned to four different uses: (i) to sawn wood, (ii) to pulp-based products, (iii) to energy biomass combusted in small-scale appliances or (iv) to energy biomass combusted in medium-to-large scale boilers. Aerosol emissions (black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC) and sulphur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>)) under these scenarios were estimated using displacement factors (DFs). The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ was used to study instantaneous radiative forcing due to aerosol–radiation interactions (IRF<sub>ARI</sub>) and effective radiative forcing (ERF), based on the differences in aerosol emissions between the alternative wood use scenarios and the baseline scenario. The results indicated that the use of sawn wood and energy biomass combusted in medium- to large-scale boilers decreased radiative forcings, implying climate cooling, whereas the increased use of pulpwood increased them. Energy biomass combustion in small-scale appliances increased IRF<sub>ARI</sub> by 0.004 W m<sup>−2</sup> but decreased ERF by −0.260 W m<sup>−2</sup>, specifically due to a strong increase in carbonaceous aerosols. Alternative use of forest biomass notably influenced aerosol emissions and their climate impacts, and it can be concluded that increased forest biomass use requires a comprehensive assessment of aerosol emissions alongside greenhouse gases (GHGs). Given the consequent reduction in radiative forcing from aerosol emissions, we conclude that the greatest overall climate benefits could be achieved by prioritising the production of long-lived wood-based products.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"17 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.70041\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70041\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.70041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
利用森林生物量可能引起气溶胶排放的变化,对这些短期气候因子的直接和间接气候效应产生后续影响。我们研究了替代木材使用情景如何影响芬兰的气溶胶排放和随之而来的辐射强迫。在所有备选方案中,森林生物量的采伐量比基线增加了1 000万立方米。增加的生物量收获分配给四种不同的用途:(i)锯木,(ii)纸浆产品,(iii)在小型器具中燃烧的能源生物质或(iv)在中型至大型锅炉中燃烧的能源生物质。利用位移因子(df)估算了这些情景下的气溶胶排放(黑碳(BC)、有机碳(OC)和二氧化硫(SO2))。利用全球气溶胶-气候模式ECHAM-HAMMOZ,基于替代木材利用情景和基线情景气溶胶排放的差异,研究了气溶胶-辐射相互作用引起的瞬时辐射强迫(IRFARI)和有效辐射强迫(ERF)。结果表明,在中大型锅炉中使用锯材和燃烧的能源生物质减少了辐射强迫,这意味着气候变冷,而纸浆木材的使用增加了它们。小型电器中的能源生物质燃烧使IRFARI增加了0.004 W m - 2,但使ERF减少了- 0.260 W m - 2,特别是由于碳质气溶胶的强烈增加。森林生物质的替代利用显著影响了气溶胶排放及其气候影响,因此可以得出结论,增加森林生物质利用需要对气溶胶排放和温室气体(ghg)进行综合评估。考虑到由此产生的气溶胶排放的辐射强迫减少,我们得出结论,通过优先生产长寿命的木基产品,可以实现最大的总体气候效益。
Radiative Forcing of Aerosol Emissions Under Alternative Wood Use Scenarios in Finland
Use of forest biomass may induce changes in the aerosol emissions, with subsequent impacts on the direct and indirect climate effects of these short-lived climate forcers. We studied how alternative wood use scenarios affected the aerosol emissions and consequent radiative forcing in Finland. In all alternative scenarios, the harvest level of forest biomass was increased by 10 million m3 compared to the baseline. The increased biomass harvest was assigned to four different uses: (i) to sawn wood, (ii) to pulp-based products, (iii) to energy biomass combusted in small-scale appliances or (iv) to energy biomass combusted in medium-to-large scale boilers. Aerosol emissions (black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC) and sulphur dioxide (SO2)) under these scenarios were estimated using displacement factors (DFs). The global aerosol–climate model ECHAM-HAMMOZ was used to study instantaneous radiative forcing due to aerosol–radiation interactions (IRFARI) and effective radiative forcing (ERF), based on the differences in aerosol emissions between the alternative wood use scenarios and the baseline scenario. The results indicated that the use of sawn wood and energy biomass combusted in medium- to large-scale boilers decreased radiative forcings, implying climate cooling, whereas the increased use of pulpwood increased them. Energy biomass combustion in small-scale appliances increased IRFARI by 0.004 W m−2 but decreased ERF by −0.260 W m−2, specifically due to a strong increase in carbonaceous aerosols. Alternative use of forest biomass notably influenced aerosol emissions and their climate impacts, and it can be concluded that increased forest biomass use requires a comprehensive assessment of aerosol emissions alongside greenhouse gases (GHGs). Given the consequent reduction in radiative forcing from aerosol emissions, we conclude that the greatest overall climate benefits could be achieved by prioritising the production of long-lived wood-based products.
期刊介绍:
GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used.
Key areas covered by the journal:
Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis).
Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW).
Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems.
Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy.
Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.