功能连通性分析的体素或区域干扰回归:重要吗?

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Tobias Muganga, Leonard Sasse, Daouia I. Larabi, Nicolás Nieto, Julian Caspers, Simon B. Eickhoff, Kaustubh R. Patil
{"title":"功能连通性分析的体素或区域干扰回归:重要吗?","authors":"Tobias Muganga,&nbsp;Leonard Sasse,&nbsp;Daouia I. Larabi,&nbsp;Nicolás Nieto,&nbsp;Julian Caspers,&nbsp;Simon B. Eickhoff,&nbsp;Kaustubh R. Patil","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Removal of nuisance signals (such as motion) from the BOLD time series is an important aspect of preprocessing to obtain meaningful resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC). The nuisance signals are commonly removed using denoising procedures at the finest resolution, that is the voxel time series. Typically, the voxel-wise time series are then aggregated into predefined regions or parcels to obtain an rs-FC matrix as the correlation between pairs of regional time series. Computational efficiency can be improved by denoising the aggregated regional time series instead of the voxel time series. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of denoising on these two resolutions is missing. In this study, we systematically investigate the effects of denoising at different time series resolutions (<i>voxel-level </i>and <i>region-level</i>) in 370 unrelated subjects from the HCP-YA dataset. Alongside the time series resolution, we considered additional factors such as aggregation method (<i>Mean</i> and <i>first eigenvariate</i> [<i>EV</i>]) and parcellation granularity (100, 400, and 1000 regions). To assess the effect of those choices on the utility of the resulting whole-brain rs-FC, we evaluated the individual specificity (fingerprinting) and the capacity to predict age and three cognitive scores. Our findings show generally equal or better performance for <i>region-level</i> denoising with notable differences depending on the aggregation method. Using <i>Mean</i> aggregation yielded equal individual specificity and prediction performance for <i>voxel-level</i> and <i>region-level</i> denoising. When <i>EV</i> was employed for aggregation, the individual specificity of <i>voxel-level</i> denoising was reduced compared to <i>region-level</i> denoising. Increasing parcellation granularity generally improved individual specificity. For the prediction of age and cognitive test scores, only fluid intelligence indicated worse performance for voxel-level denoising in the case of aggregating with the <i>EV</i>. Based on these results, we recommend the adoption of <i>region-level</i> denoising for brain-behavior investigations when using <i>Mean</i> aggregation. This approach offers equal individual specificity and prediction capacity with reduced computational resources for the analysis of rs-FC patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70323","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voxel-Wise or Region-Wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does It Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Muganga,&nbsp;Leonard Sasse,&nbsp;Daouia I. Larabi,&nbsp;Nicolás Nieto,&nbsp;Julian Caspers,&nbsp;Simon B. Eickhoff,&nbsp;Kaustubh R. Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Removal of nuisance signals (such as motion) from the BOLD time series is an important aspect of preprocessing to obtain meaningful resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC). The nuisance signals are commonly removed using denoising procedures at the finest resolution, that is the voxel time series. Typically, the voxel-wise time series are then aggregated into predefined regions or parcels to obtain an rs-FC matrix as the correlation between pairs of regional time series. Computational efficiency can be improved by denoising the aggregated regional time series instead of the voxel time series. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of denoising on these two resolutions is missing. In this study, we systematically investigate the effects of denoising at different time series resolutions (<i>voxel-level </i>and <i>region-level</i>) in 370 unrelated subjects from the HCP-YA dataset. Alongside the time series resolution, we considered additional factors such as aggregation method (<i>Mean</i> and <i>first eigenvariate</i> [<i>EV</i>]) and parcellation granularity (100, 400, and 1000 regions). To assess the effect of those choices on the utility of the resulting whole-brain rs-FC, we evaluated the individual specificity (fingerprinting) and the capacity to predict age and three cognitive scores. Our findings show generally equal or better performance for <i>region-level</i> denoising with notable differences depending on the aggregation method. Using <i>Mean</i> aggregation yielded equal individual specificity and prediction performance for <i>voxel-level</i> and <i>region-level</i> denoising. When <i>EV</i> was employed for aggregation, the individual specificity of <i>voxel-level</i> denoising was reduced compared to <i>region-level</i> denoising. Increasing parcellation granularity generally improved individual specificity. For the prediction of age and cognitive test scores, only fluid intelligence indicated worse performance for voxel-level denoising in the case of aggregating with the <i>EV</i>. Based on these results, we recommend the adoption of <i>region-level</i> denoising for brain-behavior investigations when using <i>Mean</i> aggregation. This approach offers equal individual specificity and prediction capacity with reduced computational resources for the analysis of rs-FC patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70323\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从BOLD时间序列中去除有害信号(如运动)是预处理的一个重要方面,以获得有意义的静息状态功能连接(rs-FC)。讨厌的信号通常使用去噪程序在最好的分辨率,即体素时间序列去除。通常,体素时间序列然后被聚合到预定义的区域或包中,以获得rs-FC矩阵作为区域时间序列对之间的相关性。通过对聚合区域时间序列去噪而不是对体素时间序列去噪,可以提高计算效率。然而,去噪对这两种分辨率的影响的全面比较是缺失的。在这项研究中,我们系统地研究了不同时间序列分辨率(体素级和区域级)对370名来自HCP-YA数据集的不相关受试者的去噪效果。除了时间序列分辨率,我们还考虑了其他因素,如聚合方法(均值和第一特征变量[EV])和分割粒度(100,400和1000个区域)。为了评估这些选择对产生的全脑rs-FC的效用的影响,我们评估了个体特异性(指纹)和预测年龄和三个认知得分的能力。我们的研究结果表明,区域级去噪的性能大致相同或更好,但取决于聚合方法的显着差异。在体素级和区域级去噪中,使用均值聚集产生了相同的个体特异性和预测性能。当采用EV进行聚集时,体素级去噪的个体特异性较区域级去噪降低。增加包裹粒度通常可以提高个体特异性。对于年龄和认知测试分数的预测,只有流体智力在与EV聚合的情况下显示出更差的体素级去噪性能。基于这些结果,我们建议在使用均值聚合时采用区域水平去噪来进行脑行为研究。该方法为rs-FC模式的分析提供了相同的个体特异性和预测能力,减少了计算资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Voxel-Wise or Region-Wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does It Matter?

Voxel-Wise or Region-Wise Nuisance Regression for Functional Connectivity Analyses: Does It Matter?

Removal of nuisance signals (such as motion) from the BOLD time series is an important aspect of preprocessing to obtain meaningful resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC). The nuisance signals are commonly removed using denoising procedures at the finest resolution, that is the voxel time series. Typically, the voxel-wise time series are then aggregated into predefined regions or parcels to obtain an rs-FC matrix as the correlation between pairs of regional time series. Computational efficiency can be improved by denoising the aggregated regional time series instead of the voxel time series. However, a comprehensive comparison of the effects of denoising on these two resolutions is missing. In this study, we systematically investigate the effects of denoising at different time series resolutions (voxel-level and region-level) in 370 unrelated subjects from the HCP-YA dataset. Alongside the time series resolution, we considered additional factors such as aggregation method (Mean and first eigenvariate [EV]) and parcellation granularity (100, 400, and 1000 regions). To assess the effect of those choices on the utility of the resulting whole-brain rs-FC, we evaluated the individual specificity (fingerprinting) and the capacity to predict age and three cognitive scores. Our findings show generally equal or better performance for region-level denoising with notable differences depending on the aggregation method. Using Mean aggregation yielded equal individual specificity and prediction performance for voxel-level and region-level denoising. When EV was employed for aggregation, the individual specificity of voxel-level denoising was reduced compared to region-level denoising. Increasing parcellation granularity generally improved individual specificity. For the prediction of age and cognitive test scores, only fluid intelligence indicated worse performance for voxel-level denoising in the case of aggregating with the EV. Based on these results, we recommend the adoption of region-level denoising for brain-behavior investigations when using Mean aggregation. This approach offers equal individual specificity and prediction capacity with reduced computational resources for the analysis of rs-FC patterns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信