Fritz Wortelkamp, Christian Wittekind, Lilli Busch, Ingo Krossing
{"title":"锂硫电池中与电解质相关的电极电位","authors":"Fritz Wortelkamp, Christian Wittekind, Lilli Busch, Ingo Krossing","doi":"10.1002/celc.202500109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lithium–sulfur batteries are promising for future energy storage due to their high specific capacity. However, challenges like low cycling stability and the shuttle effect hinder their practical use. A better understanding of the underlying processes is crucial. This study examines the correlation between lithium potential (<i>E</i><sub>Li</sub>) and sulfur reaction potentials, referenced against the ferrocenium/ferrocene couple as an (almost) solvent-independent reference. Sulfur reactions are divided into two main stages during discharge and charge. Most sulfur reactions show a good linear correlation with <i>E</i><sub>Li</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> up to 0.87), except for the initial reduction of S<sub>8</sub> to Li<sub>2</sub>S<sub>8</sub>, which shows no significant correlation. This suggests electrolyte design should address individual sulfur reactions rather than treating them collectively. Additionally, the correlation between <i>E</i><sub>Li</sub> and the Raman-active symmetric S–N–S stretching mode <i>v</i><sub>s</sub>(SNS) in the Li[N(SO<sub>2</sub>CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] electrolyte anion is analyzed across different electrolyte mixtures. A good linear correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73) indicates that both the Raman peak position and <i>E</i><sub>Li</sub> reflect the strength of the interaction between Li<sup>+</sup> and the electrolyte solvent and hence the Li<sup>+</sup> ion activity. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing lithium–sulfur battery electrolytes.</p>","PeriodicalId":142,"journal":{"name":"ChemElectroChem","volume":"12 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/celc.202500109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrolyte-Dependent Electrode Potentials in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries\",\"authors\":\"Fritz Wortelkamp, Christian Wittekind, Lilli Busch, Ingo Krossing\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/celc.202500109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lithium–sulfur batteries are promising for future energy storage due to their high specific capacity. However, challenges like low cycling stability and the shuttle effect hinder their practical use. A better understanding of the underlying processes is crucial. This study examines the correlation between lithium potential (<i>E</i><sub>Li</sub>) and sulfur reaction potentials, referenced against the ferrocenium/ferrocene couple as an (almost) solvent-independent reference. Sulfur reactions are divided into two main stages during discharge and charge. Most sulfur reactions show a good linear correlation with <i>E</i><sub>Li</sub> (R<sup>2</sup> up to 0.87), except for the initial reduction of S<sub>8</sub> to Li<sub>2</sub>S<sub>8</sub>, which shows no significant correlation. This suggests electrolyte design should address individual sulfur reactions rather than treating them collectively. Additionally, the correlation between <i>E</i><sub>Li</sub> and the Raman-active symmetric S–N–S stretching mode <i>v</i><sub>s</sub>(SNS) in the Li[N(SO<sub>2</sub>CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>] electrolyte anion is analyzed across different electrolyte mixtures. A good linear correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.73) indicates that both the Raman peak position and <i>E</i><sub>Li</sub> reflect the strength of the interaction between Li<sup>+</sup> and the electrolyte solvent and hence the Li<sup>+</sup> ion activity. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing lithium–sulfur battery electrolytes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ChemElectroChem\",\"volume\":\"12 16\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/celc.202500109\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ChemElectroChem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/celc.202500109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ELECTROCHEMISTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemElectroChem","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/celc.202500109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ELECTROCHEMISTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Electrolyte-Dependent Electrode Potentials in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Lithium–sulfur batteries are promising for future energy storage due to their high specific capacity. However, challenges like low cycling stability and the shuttle effect hinder their practical use. A better understanding of the underlying processes is crucial. This study examines the correlation between lithium potential (ELi) and sulfur reaction potentials, referenced against the ferrocenium/ferrocene couple as an (almost) solvent-independent reference. Sulfur reactions are divided into two main stages during discharge and charge. Most sulfur reactions show a good linear correlation with ELi (R2 up to 0.87), except for the initial reduction of S8 to Li2S8, which shows no significant correlation. This suggests electrolyte design should address individual sulfur reactions rather than treating them collectively. Additionally, the correlation between ELi and the Raman-active symmetric S–N–S stretching mode vs(SNS) in the Li[N(SO2CF3)2] electrolyte anion is analyzed across different electrolyte mixtures. A good linear correlation (R2 = 0.73) indicates that both the Raman peak position and ELi reflect the strength of the interaction between Li+ and the electrolyte solvent and hence the Li+ ion activity. These findings provide valuable insights for optimizing lithium–sulfur battery electrolytes.
期刊介绍:
ChemElectroChem is aimed to become a top-ranking electrochemistry journal for primary research papers and critical secondary information from authors across the world. The journal covers the entire scope of pure and applied electrochemistry, the latter encompassing (among others) energy applications, electrochemistry at interfaces (including surfaces), photoelectrochemistry and bioelectrochemistry.