社会对农业4.0的期望。来自地中海温室区生活实验室的证据

IF 5.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Oriana Gava , Sara Sturiale , Marisa Gallardo , Dolores Buendía Guerrero , Dursun Buyuktas , Gulcin Ece Aslan , Asma Laarif , Thameur Bouslama , Alejandra Navarro , Luca Incrocci , Fabio Bartolini
{"title":"社会对农业4.0的期望。来自地中海温室区生活实验室的证据","authors":"Oriana Gava ,&nbsp;Sara Sturiale ,&nbsp;Marisa Gallardo ,&nbsp;Dolores Buendía Guerrero ,&nbsp;Dursun Buyuktas ,&nbsp;Gulcin Ece Aslan ,&nbsp;Asma Laarif ,&nbsp;Thameur Bouslama ,&nbsp;Alejandra Navarro ,&nbsp;Luca Incrocci ,&nbsp;Fabio Bartolini","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Agriculture 4.0 technologies, including digital tools, e.g., the Internet of Things and Cloud Computing, promise significant environmental and economic benefits for intensive farming systems like greenhouses. However, their social impacts remain controversial and relatively underexplored compared to environmental and economic impacts. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by providing empirical evidence on actor expectations for the social impacts of Agriculture 4.0 technologies, specifically through the adoption of a decision support system in greenhouse farming. Using a qualitative assessment framework, the study explores the relevance and mechanisms of social impacts based on perspectives collected from four case studies in Almería (Spain), Antalya (Turkey), Monastir (Tunisia), and Tuscany (Italy). The findings reveal significant regional variations in the expected social outcomes of decision support system's adoption. While improvements in learning and skills, health, and wellbeing are anticipated, challenges remain in addressing gender gaps and the inclusion of vulnerable groups. The study underscores the importance of tailoring Agriculture 4.0 interventions to local socio-economic and political contexts to maximise their benefits. It also highlights the need for continuous training, skill enhancement, and holistic societal interventions to ensure equitable and sustainable outcomes. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners aiming to leverage digital agriculture for social sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 103855"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social expectations for Agriculture 4.0. Evidence from Living Labs in the Mediterranean greenhouse sector\",\"authors\":\"Oriana Gava ,&nbsp;Sara Sturiale ,&nbsp;Marisa Gallardo ,&nbsp;Dolores Buendía Guerrero ,&nbsp;Dursun Buyuktas ,&nbsp;Gulcin Ece Aslan ,&nbsp;Asma Laarif ,&nbsp;Thameur Bouslama ,&nbsp;Alejandra Navarro ,&nbsp;Luca Incrocci ,&nbsp;Fabio Bartolini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Agriculture 4.0 technologies, including digital tools, e.g., the Internet of Things and Cloud Computing, promise significant environmental and economic benefits for intensive farming systems like greenhouses. However, their social impacts remain controversial and relatively underexplored compared to environmental and economic impacts. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by providing empirical evidence on actor expectations for the social impacts of Agriculture 4.0 technologies, specifically through the adoption of a decision support system in greenhouse farming. Using a qualitative assessment framework, the study explores the relevance and mechanisms of social impacts based on perspectives collected from four case studies in Almería (Spain), Antalya (Turkey), Monastir (Tunisia), and Tuscany (Italy). The findings reveal significant regional variations in the expected social outcomes of decision support system's adoption. While improvements in learning and skills, health, and wellbeing are anticipated, challenges remain in addressing gender gaps and the inclusion of vulnerable groups. The study underscores the importance of tailoring Agriculture 4.0 interventions to local socio-economic and political contexts to maximise their benefits. It also highlights the need for continuous training, skill enhancement, and holistic societal interventions to ensure equitable and sustainable outcomes. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners aiming to leverage digital agriculture for social sustainability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"120 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002967\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002967","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业4.0技术,包括物联网和云计算等数字工具,为温室等集约化农业系统带来了巨大的环境和经济效益。然而,与环境和经济影响相比,它们的社会影响仍然存在争议,而且研究相对不足。本研究旨在通过提供行为者对农业4.0技术的社会影响期望的经验证据,特别是通过在温室农业中采用决策支持系统,来填补这一知识空白。本研究采用定性评估框架,基于从Almería(西班牙)、安塔利亚(土耳其)、莫纳斯提尔(突尼斯)和托斯卡纳(意大利)四个案例研究中收集的观点,探讨了社会影响的相关性和机制。研究结果显示,采用决策支持系统的预期社会结果存在显著的区域差异。虽然预计在学习和技能、健康和福祉方面会有所改善,但在解决性别差距和包容弱势群体方面仍然存在挑战。该研究强调了根据当地社会经济和政治背景调整农业4.0干预措施以实现效益最大化的重要性。它还强调需要持续培训、技能提高和全面的社会干预,以确保公平和可持续的成果。这些见解为旨在利用数字农业促进社会可持续发展的政策制定者、研究人员和实践者提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social expectations for Agriculture 4.0. Evidence from Living Labs in the Mediterranean greenhouse sector
Agriculture 4.0 technologies, including digital tools, e.g., the Internet of Things and Cloud Computing, promise significant environmental and economic benefits for intensive farming systems like greenhouses. However, their social impacts remain controversial and relatively underexplored compared to environmental and economic impacts. This study aims to fill this knowledge gap by providing empirical evidence on actor expectations for the social impacts of Agriculture 4.0 technologies, specifically through the adoption of a decision support system in greenhouse farming. Using a qualitative assessment framework, the study explores the relevance and mechanisms of social impacts based on perspectives collected from four case studies in Almería (Spain), Antalya (Turkey), Monastir (Tunisia), and Tuscany (Italy). The findings reveal significant regional variations in the expected social outcomes of decision support system's adoption. While improvements in learning and skills, health, and wellbeing are anticipated, challenges remain in addressing gender gaps and the inclusion of vulnerable groups. The study underscores the importance of tailoring Agriculture 4.0 interventions to local socio-economic and political contexts to maximise their benefits. It also highlights the need for continuous training, skill enhancement, and holistic societal interventions to ensure equitable and sustainable outcomes. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers, researchers, and practitioners aiming to leverage digital agriculture for social sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信