受弯钢筋混凝土梁用玻璃/碳/玄武岩复合FRP筋的研制

IF 6.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cristiane Lopes , Bruno Pedrosa , Grzegorz Lesiuk , Paweł Zielonka , Szymon Duda , Hermes Carvalho , José Correia , Arkadiusz Denisiewicz , Tomasz Socha , Krzysztof Kula
{"title":"受弯钢筋混凝土梁用玻璃/碳/玄武岩复合FRP筋的研制","authors":"Cristiane Lopes ,&nbsp;Bruno Pedrosa ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Lesiuk ,&nbsp;Paweł Zielonka ,&nbsp;Szymon Duda ,&nbsp;Hermes Carvalho ,&nbsp;José Correia ,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Denisiewicz ,&nbsp;Tomasz Socha ,&nbsp;Krzysztof Kula","doi":"10.1016/j.aej.2025.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>FRP rebars have been considered as an alternative solution to conventional steel rebars in concrete reinforced elements. There are still several challenges to overcome in order to make it more widely used, namely in what concerns rebars production process, mechanical properties and feasibility. This research work presents the development and characterization of a new type of hybrid FRP rebars combining glass, carbon and basalt fibres and analyses its application as tensile reinforcement on concrete beams tested under bending loading. Modifications on the standard pultrusion process were proposed (dual heat sections) leading to less voids and more homogeneous rebars. Twenty-three beams were used in the experimental campaign comparing beams reinforced with commercially available GFRP rebars, three different types of developed hybrid FRP rebars and beams with steel rebars. The bending performance was evaluated as well as load-deflection behaviour using two reinforcement ratios. In bending tests, Hybrid67 rebars outperformed GFRP with 36 % higher moment capacity and 49 % greater ductility, offering a promising alternative for durable, corrosion-resistant concrete structures. The best hybrid solution achieved tensile strengths up to 1013 MPa and improved bond and ductility. Experimental results were compared with analytical models described in American and Canadian standard models. A consistent overestimation, around 30 %, of the cracking moment was observed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7484,"journal":{"name":"alexandria engineering journal","volume":"128 ","pages":"Pages 1073-1088"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of glass/carbon/basalt hybrid FRP rebars for reinforced-concrete beams under bending\",\"authors\":\"Cristiane Lopes ,&nbsp;Bruno Pedrosa ,&nbsp;Grzegorz Lesiuk ,&nbsp;Paweł Zielonka ,&nbsp;Szymon Duda ,&nbsp;Hermes Carvalho ,&nbsp;José Correia ,&nbsp;Arkadiusz Denisiewicz ,&nbsp;Tomasz Socha ,&nbsp;Krzysztof Kula\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aej.2025.08.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>FRP rebars have been considered as an alternative solution to conventional steel rebars in concrete reinforced elements. There are still several challenges to overcome in order to make it more widely used, namely in what concerns rebars production process, mechanical properties and feasibility. This research work presents the development and characterization of a new type of hybrid FRP rebars combining glass, carbon and basalt fibres and analyses its application as tensile reinforcement on concrete beams tested under bending loading. Modifications on the standard pultrusion process were proposed (dual heat sections) leading to less voids and more homogeneous rebars. Twenty-three beams were used in the experimental campaign comparing beams reinforced with commercially available GFRP rebars, three different types of developed hybrid FRP rebars and beams with steel rebars. The bending performance was evaluated as well as load-deflection behaviour using two reinforcement ratios. In bending tests, Hybrid67 rebars outperformed GFRP with 36 % higher moment capacity and 49 % greater ductility, offering a promising alternative for durable, corrosion-resistant concrete structures. The best hybrid solution achieved tensile strengths up to 1013 MPa and improved bond and ductility. Experimental results were compared with analytical models described in American and Canadian standard models. A consistent overestimation, around 30 %, of the cracking moment was observed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"alexandria engineering journal\",\"volume\":\"128 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1073-1088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"alexandria engineering journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825009068\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"alexandria engineering journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110016825009068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

FRP筋已被认为是混凝土增强构件中传统钢筋的替代方案。为了使其得到更广泛的应用,仍有几个挑战需要克服,即在钢筋生产工艺、机械性能和可行性方面。本文介绍了一种新型玻璃纤维、碳纤维和玄武岩纤维混合FRP筋的开发和特性,并分析了其在弯曲荷载下作为混凝土梁抗拉钢筋的应用。提出了对标准拉挤工艺(双热段)的改进,使螺纹钢的孔洞更小,更均匀。试验中使用了23根梁,比较了用市售玻璃钢筋加固的梁、三种不同类型的混合玻璃钢筋和带钢筋的梁。使用两种配筋率来评估弯曲性能以及荷载-挠度行为。在弯曲测试中,Hybrid67钢筋的弯矩承载力提高了36% %,延展性提高了49% %,优于GFRP,为耐用、耐腐蚀的混凝土结构提供了一种有希望的替代方案。最佳混合溶液的抗拉强度可达1013 MPa,并改善了粘结性和延展性。实验结果与美国和加拿大标准模型所描述的分析模型进行了比较。一个一致的高估,约30 %,观察到的开裂力矩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of glass/carbon/basalt hybrid FRP rebars for reinforced-concrete beams under bending
FRP rebars have been considered as an alternative solution to conventional steel rebars in concrete reinforced elements. There are still several challenges to overcome in order to make it more widely used, namely in what concerns rebars production process, mechanical properties and feasibility. This research work presents the development and characterization of a new type of hybrid FRP rebars combining glass, carbon and basalt fibres and analyses its application as tensile reinforcement on concrete beams tested under bending loading. Modifications on the standard pultrusion process were proposed (dual heat sections) leading to less voids and more homogeneous rebars. Twenty-three beams were used in the experimental campaign comparing beams reinforced with commercially available GFRP rebars, three different types of developed hybrid FRP rebars and beams with steel rebars. The bending performance was evaluated as well as load-deflection behaviour using two reinforcement ratios. In bending tests, Hybrid67 rebars outperformed GFRP with 36 % higher moment capacity and 49 % greater ductility, offering a promising alternative for durable, corrosion-resistant concrete structures. The best hybrid solution achieved tensile strengths up to 1013 MPa and improved bond and ductility. Experimental results were compared with analytical models described in American and Canadian standard models. A consistent overestimation, around 30 %, of the cracking moment was observed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
alexandria engineering journal
alexandria engineering journal Engineering-General Engineering
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
1015
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Alexandria Engineering Journal is an international journal devoted to publishing high quality papers in the field of engineering and applied science. Alexandria Engineering Journal is cited in the Engineering Information Services (EIS) and the Chemical Abstracts (CA). The papers published in Alexandria Engineering Journal are grouped into five sections, according to the following classification: • Mechanical, Production, Marine and Textile Engineering • Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Nuclear Engineering • Civil and Architecture Engineering • Chemical Engineering and Applied Sciences • Environmental Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信