在人工智能临床诊断系统中使用渐进式披露实现选择性透明度

IF 5.1 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS
Deepa Muralidhar , Rafik Belloum , Ashwin Ashok
{"title":"在人工智能临床诊断系统中使用渐进式披露实现选择性透明度","authors":"Deepa Muralidhar ,&nbsp;Rafik Belloum ,&nbsp;Ashwin Ashok","doi":"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Explainable AI (XAI) is critical for clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS) in healthcare, but current approaches often neglect the usability of explanations from a human–computer interaction (HCI) perspective. We investigate progressive disclosure as a strategy for selective transparency to provide effective explanations without overwhelming users. This paper presents a user-centered design of AI-CDSS interface prototypes that incorporate interactive explanation features (e.g., keyword highlighting of medical terms and interactive causal diagrams) and empathy-oriented nudges (e.g., supportive prompts and icons). We evaluated these prototypes through interviews with medical professionals and students, followed by a user study with general users, to assess their impact on understanding, trust, and satisfaction. Our findings suggest that progressive, on-demand disclosure of explanation details may help users manage information load and better follow the AI’s reasoning process. While several interface features were well received, some elements such as affective cues like emojis elicited skepticism, particularly in clinical contexts, which underscores the importance of context-sensitive design choices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54955,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 103591"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operationalizing selective transparency using progressive disclosure in artificial intelligence clinical diagnosis systems\",\"authors\":\"Deepa Muralidhar ,&nbsp;Rafik Belloum ,&nbsp;Ashwin Ashok\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Explainable AI (XAI) is critical for clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS) in healthcare, but current approaches often neglect the usability of explanations from a human–computer interaction (HCI) perspective. We investigate progressive disclosure as a strategy for selective transparency to provide effective explanations without overwhelming users. This paper presents a user-centered design of AI-CDSS interface prototypes that incorporate interactive explanation features (e.g., keyword highlighting of medical terms and interactive causal diagrams) and empathy-oriented nudges (e.g., supportive prompts and icons). We evaluated these prototypes through interviews with medical professionals and students, followed by a user study with general users, to assess their impact on understanding, trust, and satisfaction. Our findings suggest that progressive, on-demand disclosure of explanation details may help users manage information load and better follow the AI’s reasoning process. While several interface features were well received, some elements such as affective cues like emojis elicited skepticism, particularly in clinical contexts, which underscores the importance of context-sensitive design choices.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies\",\"volume\":\"204 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107158192500148X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Human-Computer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107158192500148X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可解释的人工智能(XAI)对于医疗保健中的临床决策支持系统(AI- cdss)至关重要,但目前的方法往往忽视了从人机交互(HCI)角度解释的可用性。我们研究渐进式披露作为选择性透明度的策略,以提供有效的解释而不压倒用户。本文提出了以用户为中心的AI-CDSS界面原型设计,该原型包含交互式解释功能(例如,医学术语的关键字突出显示和交互式因果图)和以移情为导向的推动(例如,支持性提示和图标)。我们通过与医学专业人员和学生的访谈来评估这些原型,然后对普通用户进行用户研究,以评估它们对理解、信任和满意度的影响。我们的研究结果表明,渐进式、按需披露解释细节可能有助于用户管理信息负荷,并更好地遵循人工智能的推理过程。虽然一些界面功能很受欢迎,但一些元素,如表情符号等情感线索,引起了怀疑,特别是在临床环境中,这强调了上下文敏感设计选择的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operationalizing selective transparency using progressive disclosure in artificial intelligence clinical diagnosis systems
Explainable AI (XAI) is critical for clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSS) in healthcare, but current approaches often neglect the usability of explanations from a human–computer interaction (HCI) perspective. We investigate progressive disclosure as a strategy for selective transparency to provide effective explanations without overwhelming users. This paper presents a user-centered design of AI-CDSS interface prototypes that incorporate interactive explanation features (e.g., keyword highlighting of medical terms and interactive causal diagrams) and empathy-oriented nudges (e.g., supportive prompts and icons). We evaluated these prototypes through interviews with medical professionals and students, followed by a user study with general users, to assess their impact on understanding, trust, and satisfaction. Our findings suggest that progressive, on-demand disclosure of explanation details may help users manage information load and better follow the AI’s reasoning process. While several interface features were well received, some elements such as affective cues like emojis elicited skepticism, particularly in clinical contexts, which underscores the importance of context-sensitive design choices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 工程技术-计算机:控制论
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Human-Computer Studies publishes original research over the whole spectrum of work relevant to the theory and practice of innovative interactive systems. The journal is inherently interdisciplinary, covering research in computing, artificial intelligence, psychology, linguistics, communication, design, engineering, and social organization, which is relevant to the design, analysis, evaluation and application of innovative interactive systems. Papers at the boundaries of these disciplines are especially welcome, as it is our view that interdisciplinary approaches are needed for producing theoretical insights in this complex area and for effective deployment of innovative technologies in concrete user communities. Research areas relevant to the journal include, but are not limited to: • Innovative interaction techniques • Multimodal interaction • Speech interaction • Graphic interaction • Natural language interaction • Interaction in mobile and embedded systems • Interface design and evaluation methodologies • Design and evaluation of innovative interactive systems • User interface prototyping and management systems • Ubiquitous computing • Wearable computers • Pervasive computing • Affective computing • Empirical studies of user behaviour • Empirical studies of programming and software engineering • Computer supported cooperative work • Computer mediated communication • Virtual reality • Mixed and augmented Reality • Intelligent user interfaces • Presence ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信