Xinyu Yue , Meihuan Fu , Song Yu , Huayue Shi , Simo Cheng , Xiaofeng Zhai
{"title":"传统草药作为预防肝癌根治后复发的辅助治疗:机器学习预测模型的开发和验证","authors":"Xinyu Yue , Meihuan Fu , Song Yu , Huayue Shi , Simo Cheng , Xiaofeng Zhai","doi":"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent pathological subtype of primary liver cancer. Although numerous studies have proposed models to predict recurrence following radical resection of HCC, none have accounted for the potential impact of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This study aims to evaluate whether adjuvant therapy with traditional herbal medicine (THM) can extend recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with HCC and to develop clinical prognostic models to aid in assessing the risk of recurrence after hepatectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical data from 403 patients who underwent radical resection at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from 2002 to 2023 were collected. Patients were categorized into THM and non-THM groups on the basis of whether they received THM therapy in the early postoperative period following HCC resection, and survival analysis was conducted to assess the differences in RFS and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. To build the models, the data were split into training and testing sets. Twenty-one variables were selected using Lasso regression, and predictive models were subsequently constructed employing Cox proportional hazards regression and the random survival forest (RSF) method. A nomogram was then developed based on the Cox regression model. The models were validated and compared based on their discriminatory power, calibration performance, and clinical utility. A nomogram was then developed based on the Cox regression model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>RFS was significantly better in the THM group than in the non-THM group (<em>p</em> < 0.001), but there was no difference in OS between the two groups. The median RFS was 48.13 (95 % CI, 38.63, 57.64) months vs 18.07 months (95 % CI, 13.09, 23.04), and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates in the THM and non-THM groups were 82.26 % vs 62.58 %, 62.10 % vs 35.55 % and 45.56 % vs 29.03 %, respectively. The variables identified through Lasso regression—including THM intervention, age, postoperative AFP levels, cirrhosis, tumor diameter, and gender—were incorporated into the development of both Cox and RSF models. Both models exhibited comparable performance with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>THM adjuvant therapy following HCC resection can effectively reduce the risk of early recurrence; however, it does not significantly extend overall survival. Cox regression and RSF prediction models were successfully established, and their combined application may aid clinicians in estimating individual recurrence risk and formulating personalized treatment strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11932,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 102535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traditional herbal medicine as an adjuvant therapy for preventing the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection: Development and validation of a machine learning prediction model\",\"authors\":\"Xinyu Yue , Meihuan Fu , Song Yu , Huayue Shi , Simo Cheng , Xiaofeng Zhai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eujim.2025.102535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent pathological subtype of primary liver cancer. Although numerous studies have proposed models to predict recurrence following radical resection of HCC, none have accounted for the potential impact of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This study aims to evaluate whether adjuvant therapy with traditional herbal medicine (THM) can extend recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with HCC and to develop clinical prognostic models to aid in assessing the risk of recurrence after hepatectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical data from 403 patients who underwent radical resection at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from 2002 to 2023 were collected. Patients were categorized into THM and non-THM groups on the basis of whether they received THM therapy in the early postoperative period following HCC resection, and survival analysis was conducted to assess the differences in RFS and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. To build the models, the data were split into training and testing sets. Twenty-one variables were selected using Lasso regression, and predictive models were subsequently constructed employing Cox proportional hazards regression and the random survival forest (RSF) method. A nomogram was then developed based on the Cox regression model. The models were validated and compared based on their discriminatory power, calibration performance, and clinical utility. A nomogram was then developed based on the Cox regression model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>RFS was significantly better in the THM group than in the non-THM group (<em>p</em> < 0.001), but there was no difference in OS between the two groups. The median RFS was 48.13 (95 % CI, 38.63, 57.64) months vs 18.07 months (95 % CI, 13.09, 23.04), and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates in the THM and non-THM groups were 82.26 % vs 62.58 %, 62.10 % vs 35.55 % and 45.56 % vs 29.03 %, respectively. The variables identified through Lasso regression—including THM intervention, age, postoperative AFP levels, cirrhosis, tumor diameter, and gender—were incorporated into the development of both Cox and RSF models. Both models exhibited comparable performance with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>THM adjuvant therapy following HCC resection can effectively reduce the risk of early recurrence; however, it does not significantly extend overall survival. Cox regression and RSF prediction models were successfully established, and their combined application may aid clinicians in estimating individual recurrence risk and formulating personalized treatment strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Integrative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382025000861\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382025000861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
肝细胞癌(HCC)是原发性肝癌中最常见的病理亚型。尽管许多研究提出了预测肝癌根治后复发的模型,但没有一个研究考虑到中药(TCM)的潜在影响。本研究旨在评估传统草药(THM)辅助治疗是否可以延长HCC患者的无复发生存期(RFS),并建立临床预后模型以帮助评估肝切除术后复发的风险。方法收集2002 ~ 2023年在上海长海医院行根治性手术的403例患者的临床资料。根据HCC切除术后早期是否接受THM治疗,将患者分为THM组和非THM组,并进行生存分析,评估两组患者RFS和总生存期(OS)的差异。为了建立模型,数据被分成训练集和测试集。采用Lasso回归选择21个变量,采用Cox比例风险回归和随机生存森林(RSF)法构建预测模型。然后在Cox回归模型的基础上建立了一个nomogram。根据模型的鉴别能力、校准性能和临床效用对模型进行验证和比较。然后在Cox回归模型的基础上建立了一个nomogram。结果THM组的rfs明显优于非THM组(p < 0.001),但两组间OS无差异。中位RFS为48.13个月(95% CI, 38.63, 57.64) vs 18.07个月(95% CI, 13.09, 23.04), THM组和非THM组的1、3、5年RFS率分别为82.26% vs 62.58%, 62.10% vs 35.55%和45.56% vs 29.03%。通过Lasso回归确定的变量——包括THM干预、年龄、术后AFP水平、肝硬化、肿瘤直径和性别——被纳入Cox和RSF模型的开发。两种模型在鉴别、校准和临床应用方面表现出相当的性能。结论肝癌切除术后thm辅助治疗可有效降低早期复发风险;然而,它并没有显著延长总生存期。Cox回归和RSF预测模型成功建立,两者的联合应用可以帮助临床医生估计个体复发风险,制定个性化治疗策略。
Traditional herbal medicine as an adjuvant therapy for preventing the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radical resection: Development and validation of a machine learning prediction model
Introduction
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent pathological subtype of primary liver cancer. Although numerous studies have proposed models to predict recurrence following radical resection of HCC, none have accounted for the potential impact of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). This study aims to evaluate whether adjuvant therapy with traditional herbal medicine (THM) can extend recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with HCC and to develop clinical prognostic models to aid in assessing the risk of recurrence after hepatectomy.
Methods
Clinical data from 403 patients who underwent radical resection at Shanghai Changhai Hospital from 2002 to 2023 were collected. Patients were categorized into THM and non-THM groups on the basis of whether they received THM therapy in the early postoperative period following HCC resection, and survival analysis was conducted to assess the differences in RFS and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. To build the models, the data were split into training and testing sets. Twenty-one variables were selected using Lasso regression, and predictive models were subsequently constructed employing Cox proportional hazards regression and the random survival forest (RSF) method. A nomogram was then developed based on the Cox regression model. The models were validated and compared based on their discriminatory power, calibration performance, and clinical utility. A nomogram was then developed based on the Cox regression model.
Results
RFS was significantly better in the THM group than in the non-THM group (p < 0.001), but there was no difference in OS between the two groups. The median RFS was 48.13 (95 % CI, 38.63, 57.64) months vs 18.07 months (95 % CI, 13.09, 23.04), and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates in the THM and non-THM groups were 82.26 % vs 62.58 %, 62.10 % vs 35.55 % and 45.56 % vs 29.03 %, respectively. The variables identified through Lasso regression—including THM intervention, age, postoperative AFP levels, cirrhosis, tumor diameter, and gender—were incorporated into the development of both Cox and RSF models. Both models exhibited comparable performance with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.
Conclusion
THM adjuvant therapy following HCC resection can effectively reduce the risk of early recurrence; however, it does not significantly extend overall survival. Cox regression and RSF prediction models were successfully established, and their combined application may aid clinicians in estimating individual recurrence risk and formulating personalized treatment strategies.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Integrative Medicine (EuJIM) considers manuscripts from a wide range of complementary and integrative health care disciplines, with a particular focus on whole systems approaches, public health, self management and traditional medical systems. The journal strives to connect conventional medicine and evidence based complementary medicine. We encourage submissions reporting research with relevance for integrative clinical practice and interprofessional education.
EuJIM aims to be of interest to both conventional and integrative audiences, including healthcare practitioners, researchers, health care organisations, educationalists, and all those who seek objective and critical information on integrative medicine. To achieve this aim EuJIM provides an innovative international and interdisciplinary platform linking researchers and clinicians.
The journal focuses primarily on original research articles including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, other clinical studies, qualitative, observational and epidemiological studies. In addition we welcome short reviews, opinion articles and contributions relating to health services and policy, health economics and psychology.