{"title":"面向未来弹性基础设施的无加固盾构隧道管片节理试验研究","authors":"Minjin Cai , Timon Rabczuk , Xiaoying Zhuang","doi":"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To advance resilient infrastructure, this study explores unreinforced shield tunnel segment technologies, a critical but under-researched area. It conducted experiments on ECC-based unreinforced segments (ECCUS), comparing them with ECC-based reinforced segments (ECCRS) and reinforced concrete segments (RCS), focusing on their mechanical properties, including material characteristics, segmental deflection, joint behavior, bolt strain, damage propagation, failure modes, joint toughness, and ductility. Key findings include: (1) ECCUS joints exhibited significantly enhanced bearing capacity, with ultimate strength 34% higher than RCS and 29% higher than ECCRS. In terms of initial cracking strength, ECCUS outperformed RCS by 200% and ECCRS by 34%. (2) The absence of reinforcement cages in ECCUS reduced stiffness but improved overall segment coordination and deformation, leading to deflections 100% greater than RCS and 85% than ECCRS. (3) ECCUS and ECCRS displayed numerous, fine cracks under 200 µm wide, while RCS showed fewer, wider cracks over 3 mm, leading to significant spalling. Cracks in ECCUS were densely distributed across shear and compression zones, in contrast to RCS and ECCRS where they concentrated on compression areas. (4) ECCUS joints exhibited remarkable toughness, with elastic phase toughness 13.47 times that of RCS and 1.91 times that of ECCRS. In the normal serviceability phase, the toughness of ECCUS was 12.17 times that of RCS and 2.53 times that of ECCRS. (5) Considering multi-scale mechanical effects, ECCUS joints amplified the material advantages of ECC over RC more than 11 times during the elastic stage. These findings offer valuable insights for future resilient infrastructure development based on unreinforced construction technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48505,"journal":{"name":"Underground Space","volume":"24 ","pages":"Pages 283-310"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study on ECC-based unreinforced shield tunnel segmental joints for future resilient infrastructure\",\"authors\":\"Minjin Cai , Timon Rabczuk , Xiaoying Zhuang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.undsp.2024.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To advance resilient infrastructure, this study explores unreinforced shield tunnel segment technologies, a critical but under-researched area. It conducted experiments on ECC-based unreinforced segments (ECCUS), comparing them with ECC-based reinforced segments (ECCRS) and reinforced concrete segments (RCS), focusing on their mechanical properties, including material characteristics, segmental deflection, joint behavior, bolt strain, damage propagation, failure modes, joint toughness, and ductility. Key findings include: (1) ECCUS joints exhibited significantly enhanced bearing capacity, with ultimate strength 34% higher than RCS and 29% higher than ECCRS. In terms of initial cracking strength, ECCUS outperformed RCS by 200% and ECCRS by 34%. (2) The absence of reinforcement cages in ECCUS reduced stiffness but improved overall segment coordination and deformation, leading to deflections 100% greater than RCS and 85% than ECCRS. (3) ECCUS and ECCRS displayed numerous, fine cracks under 200 µm wide, while RCS showed fewer, wider cracks over 3 mm, leading to significant spalling. Cracks in ECCUS were densely distributed across shear and compression zones, in contrast to RCS and ECCRS where they concentrated on compression areas. (4) ECCUS joints exhibited remarkable toughness, with elastic phase toughness 13.47 times that of RCS and 1.91 times that of ECCRS. In the normal serviceability phase, the toughness of ECCUS was 12.17 times that of RCS and 2.53 times that of ECCRS. (5) Considering multi-scale mechanical effects, ECCUS joints amplified the material advantages of ECC over RC more than 11 times during the elastic stage. These findings offer valuable insights for future resilient infrastructure development based on unreinforced construction technologies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Underground Space\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 283-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Underground Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967425000698\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Underground Space","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2467967425000698","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental study on ECC-based unreinforced shield tunnel segmental joints for future resilient infrastructure
To advance resilient infrastructure, this study explores unreinforced shield tunnel segment technologies, a critical but under-researched area. It conducted experiments on ECC-based unreinforced segments (ECCUS), comparing them with ECC-based reinforced segments (ECCRS) and reinforced concrete segments (RCS), focusing on their mechanical properties, including material characteristics, segmental deflection, joint behavior, bolt strain, damage propagation, failure modes, joint toughness, and ductility. Key findings include: (1) ECCUS joints exhibited significantly enhanced bearing capacity, with ultimate strength 34% higher than RCS and 29% higher than ECCRS. In terms of initial cracking strength, ECCUS outperformed RCS by 200% and ECCRS by 34%. (2) The absence of reinforcement cages in ECCUS reduced stiffness but improved overall segment coordination and deformation, leading to deflections 100% greater than RCS and 85% than ECCRS. (3) ECCUS and ECCRS displayed numerous, fine cracks under 200 µm wide, while RCS showed fewer, wider cracks over 3 mm, leading to significant spalling. Cracks in ECCUS were densely distributed across shear and compression zones, in contrast to RCS and ECCRS where they concentrated on compression areas. (4) ECCUS joints exhibited remarkable toughness, with elastic phase toughness 13.47 times that of RCS and 1.91 times that of ECCRS. In the normal serviceability phase, the toughness of ECCUS was 12.17 times that of RCS and 2.53 times that of ECCRS. (5) Considering multi-scale mechanical effects, ECCUS joints amplified the material advantages of ECC over RC more than 11 times during the elastic stage. These findings offer valuable insights for future resilient infrastructure development based on unreinforced construction technologies.
期刊介绍:
Underground Space is an open access international journal without article processing charges (APC) committed to serving as a scientific forum for researchers and practitioners in the field of underground engineering. The journal welcomes manuscripts that deal with original theories, methods, technologies, and important applications throughout the life-cycle of underground projects, including planning, design, operation and maintenance, disaster prevention, and demolition. The journal is particularly interested in manuscripts related to the latest development of smart underground engineering from the perspectives of resilience, resources saving, environmental friendliness, humanity, and artificial intelligence. The manuscripts are expected to have significant innovation and potential impact in the field of underground engineering, and should have clear association with or application in underground projects.