ICS教学模块:前列腺根治术后尿失禁患者的尿动力学检测

IF 1.2
Carlos Arturo Levi D'Ancona , Tufan Tarcan , Stefania Musco , Arthur Degani Ottaiano , Peter F.W.M. Rosier
{"title":"ICS教学模块:前列腺根治术后尿失禁患者的尿动力学检测","authors":"Carlos Arturo Levi D'Ancona ,&nbsp;Tufan Tarcan ,&nbsp;Stefania Musco ,&nbsp;Arthur Degani Ottaiano ,&nbsp;Peter F.W.M. Rosier","doi":"10.1016/j.cont.2025.102275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To present the body of evidence on the practice of assessment and diagnosis of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) in post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PRP-UI). This serves as a scientific background overview for a presentation made available on the International Continence Society (ICS) website.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>ICS-Teaching module prepared by an ad-hoc working group instituted by the ICS Urodynamics Committee using an expert literature review focusing on guidelines and clinical practice and consensus formation by the members of the working group. Finally, the content was reviewed by the core members of the ICS Urodynamics and Standardisation Steering Committees.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In addition to non-invasive initial assessment of PRP-UI, clinical practice guidelines state that a specialist (urologist-) assessment includes performing or considering invasive urodynamics to evaluate LUT functions before surgical treatment. We explain the practical elements and consequences of this.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This module provides expert guidance on the diagnosis of dysfunction in patients with signs and symptoms of PRP-UI. The coexistence of (other) LUTD with UI is plausibly relevant to management selection, although prospective evidence for this is understudied. Standard urodynamic techniques can be used but should in certain cases be adapted and supplemented for the testing of patients with PRP-UI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72702,"journal":{"name":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 102275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICS teaching module: Urodynamic testing for patients with post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Arturo Levi D'Ancona ,&nbsp;Tufan Tarcan ,&nbsp;Stefania Musco ,&nbsp;Arthur Degani Ottaiano ,&nbsp;Peter F.W.M. Rosier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cont.2025.102275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To present the body of evidence on the practice of assessment and diagnosis of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) in post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PRP-UI). This serves as a scientific background overview for a presentation made available on the International Continence Society (ICS) website.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>ICS-Teaching module prepared by an ad-hoc working group instituted by the ICS Urodynamics Committee using an expert literature review focusing on guidelines and clinical practice and consensus formation by the members of the working group. Finally, the content was reviewed by the core members of the ICS Urodynamics and Standardisation Steering Committees.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In addition to non-invasive initial assessment of PRP-UI, clinical practice guidelines state that a specialist (urologist-) assessment includes performing or considering invasive urodynamics to evaluate LUT functions before surgical treatment. We explain the practical elements and consequences of this.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This module provides expert guidance on the diagnosis of dysfunction in patients with signs and symptoms of PRP-UI. The coexistence of (other) LUTD with UI is plausibly relevant to management selection, although prospective evidence for this is understudied. Standard urodynamic techniques can be used but should in certain cases be adapted and supplemented for the testing of patients with PRP-UI.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277297372500534X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277297372500534X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁(PRP-UI)患者下尿路功能障碍(LUTD)的评估和诊断方法。这是国际自制学会(ICS)网站上提供的一份报告的科学背景概述。方法ICS-教学模块由ICS尿动力学委员会设立的一个特设工作组编写,使用专家文献综述,重点是指南和临床实践,并由工作组成员达成共识。最后,ICS尿动力学和标准化指导委员会的核心成员对内容进行了审查。结果除了对PRP-UI进行非侵入性初始评估外,临床实践指南还指出,专家(泌尿科医生)的评估包括在手术前进行或考虑侵入性尿动力学来评估LUT功能。我们将解释这种做法的实际因素和后果。结论该模块提供了专家指导的诊断功能障碍的患者的体征和症状的PRP-UI。(其他)LUTD与UI的共存似乎与管理选择有关,尽管这方面的前瞻性证据尚未得到充分研究。标准尿动力学技术可以使用,但在某些情况下,应适应和补充用于PRP-UI患者的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ICS teaching module: Urodynamic testing for patients with post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence

Aim

To present the body of evidence on the practice of assessment and diagnosis of lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) in post radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PRP-UI). This serves as a scientific background overview for a presentation made available on the International Continence Society (ICS) website.

Methods

ICS-Teaching module prepared by an ad-hoc working group instituted by the ICS Urodynamics Committee using an expert literature review focusing on guidelines and clinical practice and consensus formation by the members of the working group. Finally, the content was reviewed by the core members of the ICS Urodynamics and Standardisation Steering Committees.

Results

In addition to non-invasive initial assessment of PRP-UI, clinical practice guidelines state that a specialist (urologist-) assessment includes performing or considering invasive urodynamics to evaluate LUT functions before surgical treatment. We explain the practical elements and consequences of this.

Conclusions

This module provides expert guidance on the diagnosis of dysfunction in patients with signs and symptoms of PRP-UI. The coexistence of (other) LUTD with UI is plausibly relevant to management selection, although prospective evidence for this is understudied. Standard urodynamic techniques can be used but should in certain cases be adapted and supplemented for the testing of patients with PRP-UI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信