国际航运中可持续可再生燃料的前瞻性生命周期评估框架:氢基燃料

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Seungman Ha , Hayoung Jang , Chybyung Park , Byongug Jeong
{"title":"国际航运中可持续可再生燃料的前瞻性生命周期评估框架:氢基燃料","authors":"Seungman Ha ,&nbsp;Hayoung Jang ,&nbsp;Chybyung Park ,&nbsp;Byongug Jeong","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents a prospective life cycle assessment (pLCA) framework to evaluate the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential of hydrogen-based e-fuels in international shipping. Maritime transport currently contributes approximately 2.89 % of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, with projections indicating a possible increase to 130 % of 2008 levels by 2050. In response, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) aims for net-zero emissions around 2050, necessitating a shift from fossil-based fuels to renewable alternatives. However, concerns persist regarding the life-cycle GHG emissions of such fuels, especially during the well-to-tank stage.</div><div>This study develops a pLCA framework that goes beyond conventional attributional or consequential LCA approaches by incorporating future-oriented parameters such as projected transport demand, vessel scrapping rates, and the impact of evolving international regulations (e.g., CII and EEXI). Using a dynamic fleet modeling approach applied to 2062 bulk carriers over 50,000 GT, the study simulates multiple decarbonization pathways and fuel uptake scenarios through 2030, 2040, and 2050. It integrates upstream fuel production emissions—linked to electricity source carbon intensity and technology readiness—with downstream fleet emissions, reflecting regulatory and operational constraints.</div><div>The results reveal that while renewable e-fuels such as e-ammonia and e-hydrogen show promising GHG reductions, their effectiveness is highly dependent on the carbon intensity of electricity used in fuel synthesis and on policy-driven adoption rates. The proposed framework offers a reproducible tool for policymakers and shipowners to assess the effectiveness of decarbonization strategies in meeting IMO targets, particularly for import-reliant countries like South Korea.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"226 ","pages":"Article 116219"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective life cycle assessment framework for sustainable renewable fuels in international shipping: Hydrogen based e fuels\",\"authors\":\"Seungman Ha ,&nbsp;Hayoung Jang ,&nbsp;Chybyung Park ,&nbsp;Byongug Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2025.116219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents a prospective life cycle assessment (pLCA) framework to evaluate the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential of hydrogen-based e-fuels in international shipping. Maritime transport currently contributes approximately 2.89 % of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, with projections indicating a possible increase to 130 % of 2008 levels by 2050. In response, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) aims for net-zero emissions around 2050, necessitating a shift from fossil-based fuels to renewable alternatives. However, concerns persist regarding the life-cycle GHG emissions of such fuels, especially during the well-to-tank stage.</div><div>This study develops a pLCA framework that goes beyond conventional attributional or consequential LCA approaches by incorporating future-oriented parameters such as projected transport demand, vessel scrapping rates, and the impact of evolving international regulations (e.g., CII and EEXI). Using a dynamic fleet modeling approach applied to 2062 bulk carriers over 50,000 GT, the study simulates multiple decarbonization pathways and fuel uptake scenarios through 2030, 2040, and 2050. It integrates upstream fuel production emissions—linked to electricity source carbon intensity and technology readiness—with downstream fleet emissions, reflecting regulatory and operational constraints.</div><div>The results reveal that while renewable e-fuels such as e-ammonia and e-hydrogen show promising GHG reductions, their effectiveness is highly dependent on the carbon intensity of electricity used in fuel synthesis and on policy-driven adoption rates. The proposed framework offers a reproducible tool for policymakers and shipowners to assess the effectiveness of decarbonization strategies in meeting IMO targets, particularly for import-reliant countries like South Korea.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"226 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116219\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125008925\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125008925","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个前瞻性生命周期评估(pLCA)框架,以评估氢基电子燃料在国际航运中的温室气体(GHG)减排潜力。目前,海运对全球人为温室气体排放的贡献约为2.89%,预计到2050年可能会增加到2008年水平的130%。为此,国际海事组织(IMO)的目标是在2050年左右实现净零排放,这就需要从化石燃料转向可再生燃料。然而,人们仍然担心这种燃料的生命周期温室气体排放,特别是在从油井到储罐的阶段。本研究开发了一个pLCA框架,超越了传统的归因或间接LCA方法,结合了面向未来的参数,如预计运输需求、船舶拆解率和不断发展的国际法规(例如CII和EEXI)的影响。该研究采用了一种动态船队建模方法,应用于2062艘超过50,000 GT的散货船,模拟了2030年、2040年和2050年的多种脱碳途径和燃料吸收情景。它整合了上游燃料生产排放(与电力源碳强度和技术准备程度相关)与下游车队排放,反映了监管和运营限制。研究结果表明,虽然e-氨和e-氢等可再生电子燃料显示出减少温室气体排放的前景,但它们的有效性高度依赖于燃料合成中使用的电力的碳强度和政策驱动的采用率。拟议的框架为政策制定者和船东提供了一个可复制的工具,以评估脱碳战略在实现国际海事组织目标方面的有效性,特别是对于像韩国这样依赖进口的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective life cycle assessment framework for sustainable renewable fuels in international shipping: Hydrogen based e fuels
This paper presents a prospective life cycle assessment (pLCA) framework to evaluate the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction potential of hydrogen-based e-fuels in international shipping. Maritime transport currently contributes approximately 2.89 % of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, with projections indicating a possible increase to 130 % of 2008 levels by 2050. In response, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) aims for net-zero emissions around 2050, necessitating a shift from fossil-based fuels to renewable alternatives. However, concerns persist regarding the life-cycle GHG emissions of such fuels, especially during the well-to-tank stage.
This study develops a pLCA framework that goes beyond conventional attributional or consequential LCA approaches by incorporating future-oriented parameters such as projected transport demand, vessel scrapping rates, and the impact of evolving international regulations (e.g., CII and EEXI). Using a dynamic fleet modeling approach applied to 2062 bulk carriers over 50,000 GT, the study simulates multiple decarbonization pathways and fuel uptake scenarios through 2030, 2040, and 2050. It integrates upstream fuel production emissions—linked to electricity source carbon intensity and technology readiness—with downstream fleet emissions, reflecting regulatory and operational constraints.
The results reveal that while renewable e-fuels such as e-ammonia and e-hydrogen show promising GHG reductions, their effectiveness is highly dependent on the carbon intensity of electricity used in fuel synthesis and on policy-driven adoption rates. The proposed framework offers a reproducible tool for policymakers and shipowners to assess the effectiveness of decarbonization strategies in meeting IMO targets, particularly for import-reliant countries like South Korea.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信