无人机自动体外除颤器在院外心脏骤停应急响应中的应用模拟研究。

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Resuscitation plus Pub Date : 2025-07-25 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101045
Christopher M Smith, Carl Powell, Celia J Bernstein, Harry Howe, Mark Holt, Mary O'Sullivan, Keith Couper, Nigel Rees
{"title":"无人机自动体外除颤器在院外心脏骤停应急响应中的应用模拟研究。","authors":"Christopher M Smith, Carl Powell, Celia J Bernstein, Harry Howe, Mark Holt, Mary O'Sullivan, Keith Couper, Nigel Rees","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drones are now being used to deliver Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Delays occur before (between emergency call and drone take-off) and after drone flight itself (related to bystander interaction with drone/AED). The emergency call-handler may have an important role in helping bystanders retrieve and use an AED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following an emergency (999) call for simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, a remote drone was activated and made autonomous Beyond Visual Line of Sight flights to the scene. Real-time communications between drone operator and call-handler allowed participants to receive updates about drone progress. Outcomes included hands-off CPR time, time away from patient's side retrieving the AED, time from emergency call to start of drone flight, and time from drone arrival to AED shock. We used video-recording, emergency-call audio and post-simulation interviews to gather additional information about participants' experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 11 single bystander simulations and successfully delivered an AED on 9 occasions. It took (median) 2:18 min (interquartile range, IQR 2:13-2:38 min) from emergency call to drone take-off, and a further 4:35 min (3:39-4:46 min) once the drone had arrived on scene until first shock. Hands-off CPR time was 2:32 min (2:01-2:46 min); 0:16 min (0:13-0:21 min) of this was spent retrieving the AED. Bystanders retrieved the AED safely and interacted well with the drone, but often struggled with AED use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated effective real-time communication during simulations. Drone start-up procedures were quick but there were delays once the drone arrived on scene. Bystanders and call-handlers need more support to effectively use drone-delivered AEDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"25 ","pages":"101045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of drone-delivered Automated External Defibrillators in the emergency response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A simulation study.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher M Smith, Carl Powell, Celia J Bernstein, Harry Howe, Mark Holt, Mary O'Sullivan, Keith Couper, Nigel Rees\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drones are now being used to deliver Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Delays occur before (between emergency call and drone take-off) and after drone flight itself (related to bystander interaction with drone/AED). The emergency call-handler may have an important role in helping bystanders retrieve and use an AED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following an emergency (999) call for simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, a remote drone was activated and made autonomous Beyond Visual Line of Sight flights to the scene. Real-time communications between drone operator and call-handler allowed participants to receive updates about drone progress. Outcomes included hands-off CPR time, time away from patient's side retrieving the AED, time from emergency call to start of drone flight, and time from drone arrival to AED shock. We used video-recording, emergency-call audio and post-simulation interviews to gather additional information about participants' experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We conducted 11 single bystander simulations and successfully delivered an AED on 9 occasions. It took (median) 2:18 min (interquartile range, IQR 2:13-2:38 min) from emergency call to drone take-off, and a further 4:35 min (3:39-4:46 min) once the drone had arrived on scene until first shock. Hands-off CPR time was 2:32 min (2:01-2:46 min); 0:16 min (0:13-0:21 min) of this was spent retrieving the AED. Bystanders retrieved the AED safely and interacted well with the drone, but often struggled with AED use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated effective real-time communication during simulations. Drone start-up procedures were quick but there were delays once the drone arrived on scene. Bystanders and call-handlers need more support to effectively use drone-delivered AEDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"101045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355114/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation plus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无人机现在被用来运送自动体外除颤器(aed)用于院外心脏骤停。延迟发生在(紧急呼叫和无人机起飞之间)和无人机飞行之后(与旁观者与无人机/AED的互动有关)。紧急呼叫处理人员可能在帮助旁观者找回和使用AED方面发挥重要作用。方法:在模拟院外心脏骤停的紧急(999)呼叫后,一架远程无人机被激活,并进行自主超视距飞行到现场。无人机操作员和呼叫处理人员之间的实时通信允许参与者接收有关无人机进度的最新信息。结果包括不干预CPR的时间、远离患者侧取AED的时间、从紧急呼叫到无人机开始飞行的时间、以及从无人机到达到AED休克的时间。我们使用视频记录、紧急呼叫音频和模拟后访谈来收集有关参与者经历的额外信息。结果:我们进行了11次单人旁观者模拟,并成功实施了9次AED。从紧急呼叫到无人机起飞(中位数)花了2:18分钟(四分位数区间,IQR 2:13-2:38分钟),一旦无人机到达现场,再花4:35分钟(3:39-4:46分钟),直到第一次休克。不提心肺复苏时间为2:32 min (2:01-2:46 min);其中0:16分钟(0:13-0:21分钟)用于取出AED。旁观者安全地取回了AED,并与无人机进行了良好的互动,但经常难以使用AED。结论:我们在模拟中展示了有效的实时通信。无人机启动程序很快,但一旦无人机到达现场,就会出现延误。旁观者和呼叫处理人员需要更多的支持才能有效地使用无人机运送的aed。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of drone-delivered Automated External Defibrillators in the emergency response for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A simulation study.

Background: Drones are now being used to deliver Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Delays occur before (between emergency call and drone take-off) and after drone flight itself (related to bystander interaction with drone/AED). The emergency call-handler may have an important role in helping bystanders retrieve and use an AED.

Methods: Following an emergency (999) call for simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, a remote drone was activated and made autonomous Beyond Visual Line of Sight flights to the scene. Real-time communications between drone operator and call-handler allowed participants to receive updates about drone progress. Outcomes included hands-off CPR time, time away from patient's side retrieving the AED, time from emergency call to start of drone flight, and time from drone arrival to AED shock. We used video-recording, emergency-call audio and post-simulation interviews to gather additional information about participants' experiences.

Results: We conducted 11 single bystander simulations and successfully delivered an AED on 9 occasions. It took (median) 2:18 min (interquartile range, IQR 2:13-2:38 min) from emergency call to drone take-off, and a further 4:35 min (3:39-4:46 min) once the drone had arrived on scene until first shock. Hands-off CPR time was 2:32 min (2:01-2:46 min); 0:16 min (0:13-0:21 min) of this was spent retrieving the AED. Bystanders retrieved the AED safely and interacted well with the drone, but often struggled with AED use.

Conclusion: We demonstrated effective real-time communication during simulations. Drone start-up procedures were quick but there were delays once the drone arrived on scene. Bystanders and call-handlers need more support to effectively use drone-delivered AEDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信