2025年国家创伤登记状况:我们取得进展了吗?

IF 2
Elizabeth C Lendrum, Haley Hayes, Meera Kotagal, Taunya Kessler, Brad Sobolewski, David Schnadower
{"title":"2025年国家创伤登记状况:我们取得进展了吗?","authors":"Elizabeth C Lendrum, Haley Hayes, Meera Kotagal, Taunya Kessler, Brad Sobolewski, David Schnadower","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality, granular, accessible, and timely data are essential for evaluating regional trauma ecosystems and implementing programs to improve trauma care. State trauma registries play a crucial role in collecting, disseminating, and sharing data for clinicians, researchers, implementation scientists, and policymakers. This study aimed to assess the status and progress of statewide trauma registries in the United States over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured electronic survey was administered to eligible and consenting state trauma registry managers or emergency medical services personnel between July 2024 and November 2024. The survey gathered information on registry infrastructure, data collection and reporting processes, and data quality assurance measures. Findings were compared with those from a similar survey conducted in 2004.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 50 states and the District of Columbia participated in the survey. Forty-seven states (92 %) reported an active trauma registry, an increase of 15 since 2004. Four states have never had a statewide registry, though two are planning to develop one. Among states with registries, only 18 (38 %) mandate data submission from all hospitals. While many registries have transitioned to web-based systems and updated software over the last two decades, 34 registries (72 %) still rely on manual data abstraction, and 28 (60 %) lack integration with electronic health records. Additionally, only 20 (43 %) state registries contribute data to national collection efforts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although progress has been made in establishing and modernizing state trauma registries since 2004, significant gaps remain, particularly in the absence of comprehensive mandatory reporting, the reliance on manual data entry, and the lack of integration with electronic health records and national databases. Addressing these challenges is essential for reducing the burden on registry teams and providing accurate, actionable, and timely data for improving trauma care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112678"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status of state trauma registries 2025: Have we made progress?\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth C Lendrum, Haley Hayes, Meera Kotagal, Taunya Kessler, Brad Sobolewski, David Schnadower\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-quality, granular, accessible, and timely data are essential for evaluating regional trauma ecosystems and implementing programs to improve trauma care. State trauma registries play a crucial role in collecting, disseminating, and sharing data for clinicians, researchers, implementation scientists, and policymakers. This study aimed to assess the status and progress of statewide trauma registries in the United States over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured electronic survey was administered to eligible and consenting state trauma registry managers or emergency medical services personnel between July 2024 and November 2024. The survey gathered information on registry infrastructure, data collection and reporting processes, and data quality assurance measures. Findings were compared with those from a similar survey conducted in 2004.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 50 states and the District of Columbia participated in the survey. Forty-seven states (92 %) reported an active trauma registry, an increase of 15 since 2004. Four states have never had a statewide registry, though two are planning to develop one. Among states with registries, only 18 (38 %) mandate data submission from all hospitals. While many registries have transitioned to web-based systems and updated software over the last two decades, 34 registries (72 %) still rely on manual data abstraction, and 28 (60 %) lack integration with electronic health records. Additionally, only 20 (43 %) state registries contribute data to national collection efforts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although progress has been made in establishing and modernizing state trauma registries since 2004, significant gaps remain, particularly in the absence of comprehensive mandatory reporting, the reliance on manual data entry, and the lack of integration with electronic health records and national databases. Addressing these challenges is essential for reducing the burden on registry teams and providing accurate, actionable, and timely data for improving trauma care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"112678\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高质量、细粒度、可获取和及时的数据对于评估区域创伤生态系统和实施改善创伤护理的计划至关重要。国家创伤登记处在为临床医生、研究人员、实施科学家和政策制定者收集、传播和共享数据方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究旨在评估过去20年来美国全州创伤登记的现状和进展。方法:在2024年7月至2024年11月期间,对符合条件并同意的州创伤登记管理人员或紧急医疗服务人员进行结构化电子调查。该调查收集了有关注册基础设施、数据收集和报告流程以及数据质量保证措施的信息。研究结果与2004年进行的一项类似调查的结果进行了比较。结果:所有50个州和哥伦比亚特区都参与了调查。47个州(92%)报告了积极的创伤登记,自2004年以来增加了15个。有四个州从未有过全州范围的登记制度,但有两个州正计划建立一个。在设有登记处的国家中,只有18个(38%)要求所有医院提交数据。虽然在过去二十年中,许多注册中心已经过渡到基于网络的系统和更新的软件,但34个注册中心(72%)仍然依赖于手动数据抽象,28个注册中心(60%)缺乏与电子健康记录的集成。此外,只有20个(43%)州登记处为国家收集工作提供数据。结论:尽管自2004年以来在建立国家创伤登记处和使其现代化方面取得了进展,但仍然存在重大差距,特别是在缺乏全面的强制性报告、依赖人工数据输入以及缺乏与电子健康记录和国家数据库的整合方面。解决这些挑战对于减轻登记团队的负担以及为改善创伤护理提供准确、可操作和及时的数据至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Status of state trauma registries 2025: Have we made progress?

Background: High-quality, granular, accessible, and timely data are essential for evaluating regional trauma ecosystems and implementing programs to improve trauma care. State trauma registries play a crucial role in collecting, disseminating, and sharing data for clinicians, researchers, implementation scientists, and policymakers. This study aimed to assess the status and progress of statewide trauma registries in the United States over the past 20 years.

Methods: A structured electronic survey was administered to eligible and consenting state trauma registry managers or emergency medical services personnel between July 2024 and November 2024. The survey gathered information on registry infrastructure, data collection and reporting processes, and data quality assurance measures. Findings were compared with those from a similar survey conducted in 2004.

Results: All 50 states and the District of Columbia participated in the survey. Forty-seven states (92 %) reported an active trauma registry, an increase of 15 since 2004. Four states have never had a statewide registry, though two are planning to develop one. Among states with registries, only 18 (38 %) mandate data submission from all hospitals. While many registries have transitioned to web-based systems and updated software over the last two decades, 34 registries (72 %) still rely on manual data abstraction, and 28 (60 %) lack integration with electronic health records. Additionally, only 20 (43 %) state registries contribute data to national collection efforts.

Conclusions: Although progress has been made in establishing and modernizing state trauma registries since 2004, significant gaps remain, particularly in the absence of comprehensive mandatory reporting, the reliance on manual data entry, and the lack of integration with electronic health records and national databases. Addressing these challenges is essential for reducing the burden on registry teams and providing accurate, actionable, and timely data for improving trauma care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信