环境能力的数字证书:气候教育开放识别系统的范围审查。

Open research Europe Pub Date : 2025-08-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/openreseurope.20048.3
Pablo Martín-Ramos, Dileyni Diaz-De-Oleo, Fatma Fourati-Jamoussi, Kimberley Couchy, Lucio Alessandro Lo Giudice, Barbara Tosi, Frederico Oliveira-Pinto, Luís Veiga-Martins, Luis Manuel Navas-Gracia
{"title":"环境能力的数字证书:气候教育开放识别系统的范围审查。","authors":"Pablo Martín-Ramos, Dileyni Diaz-De-Oleo, Fatma Fourati-Jamoussi, Kimberley Couchy, Lucio Alessandro Lo Giudice, Barbara Tosi, Frederico Oliveira-Pinto, Luís Veiga-Martins, Luis Manuel Navas-Gracia","doi":"10.12688/openreseurope.20048.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open education recognition systems are transforming how skills and competencies are validated across formal, informal, and non-formal learning environments. This scoping review examines current practices in open recognition systems-including micro-credentials, digital badges, and open educational resources (OER) completion certificates and participation badges-with particular emphasis on their application and potential in climate education. Following systematic search strategies across eight databases, we analyzed 70 publications (2010-2024) comprising journal articles, book chapters, institutional reports, and conference proceedings to map existing evidence, identify key concepts, and uncover gaps in applying these systems to climate education. The analysis reveals that while these systems have significant potential to bridge academic learning with professional demands and environmental action, their impact is limited by persistent challenges: lack of definitional consistency and quality-assurance standards across institutions; significant technological barriers to credential portability and verification; and lack of awareness and trust from employers, undermining these credentials' currency in the labor market. Despite these challenges, notable findings include the growing importance of micro-credentials for validating climate adaptation skills, the value of open badges in recognizing interdisciplinary competencies essential for environmental action, and the need for integrated qualification frameworks that can accommodate both formal and informal learning pathways in sustainability education. This integration is critical for validating the interdisciplinary and action-oriented skills demanded by the green economy, often acquired through the non-formal and informal learning pathways characteristic of environmental action and advocacy. Our review concludes that a significant implementation and research gap exists between open recognition's potential and its application in climate education. Most notably, we find a near-complete absence of recognition frameworks for eco-pedagogical activities, perpetuating focus on technical knowledge over transformative, action-oriented learning. We recommend that future work prioritize creating robust, co-designed assessment models for these critical competencies to bridge the gap between education and meaningful climate action.</p>","PeriodicalId":74359,"journal":{"name":"Open research Europe","volume":"5 ","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital credentials for environmental competencies: A scoping review of open recognition systems in climate education.\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Martín-Ramos, Dileyni Diaz-De-Oleo, Fatma Fourati-Jamoussi, Kimberley Couchy, Lucio Alessandro Lo Giudice, Barbara Tosi, Frederico Oliveira-Pinto, Luís Veiga-Martins, Luis Manuel Navas-Gracia\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/openreseurope.20048.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Open education recognition systems are transforming how skills and competencies are validated across formal, informal, and non-formal learning environments. This scoping review examines current practices in open recognition systems-including micro-credentials, digital badges, and open educational resources (OER) completion certificates and participation badges-with particular emphasis on their application and potential in climate education. Following systematic search strategies across eight databases, we analyzed 70 publications (2010-2024) comprising journal articles, book chapters, institutional reports, and conference proceedings to map existing evidence, identify key concepts, and uncover gaps in applying these systems to climate education. The analysis reveals that while these systems have significant potential to bridge academic learning with professional demands and environmental action, their impact is limited by persistent challenges: lack of definitional consistency and quality-assurance standards across institutions; significant technological barriers to credential portability and verification; and lack of awareness and trust from employers, undermining these credentials' currency in the labor market. Despite these challenges, notable findings include the growing importance of micro-credentials for validating climate adaptation skills, the value of open badges in recognizing interdisciplinary competencies essential for environmental action, and the need for integrated qualification frameworks that can accommodate both formal and informal learning pathways in sustainability education. This integration is critical for validating the interdisciplinary and action-oriented skills demanded by the green economy, often acquired through the non-formal and informal learning pathways characteristic of environmental action and advocacy. Our review concludes that a significant implementation and research gap exists between open recognition's potential and its application in climate education. Most notably, we find a near-complete absence of recognition frameworks for eco-pedagogical activities, perpetuating focus on technical knowledge over transformative, action-oriented learning. We recommend that future work prioritize creating robust, co-designed assessment models for these critical competencies to bridge the gap between education and meaningful climate action.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open research Europe\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355165/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open research Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.20048.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open research Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.20048.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放教育识别系统正在改变在正式、非正式和非正式学习环境中验证技能和能力的方式。本范围审查审查了开放认证系统的现行做法,包括微证书、数字徽章、开放教育资源(OER)完成证书和参与徽章,特别强调了它们在气候教育中的应用和潜力。通过对8个数据库的系统搜索策略,我们分析了70份出版物(2010-2024年),包括期刊文章、书籍章节、机构报告和会议记录,以绘制现有证据,确定关键概念,并发现将这些系统应用于气候教育方面的差距。分析表明,虽然这些系统具有巨大的潜力,可以将学术学习与专业需求和环境行动联系起来,但它们的影响受到持续挑战的限制:缺乏跨机构的定义一致性和质量保证标准;凭证可移植性和验证方面的重大技术障碍;雇主缺乏意识和信任,削弱了这些证书在劳动力市场上的影响力。尽管存在这些挑战,但值得注意的发现包括:微型证书对验证气候适应技能的重要性日益增加;开放式徽章在识别环境行动所必需的跨学科能力方面的价值;以及在可持续发展教育中需要能够适应正式和非正式学习途径的综合资格框架。这种整合对于确认绿色经济所需要的跨学科和面向行动的技能至关重要,这些技能往往是通过环境行动和宣传的非正规和非正式学习途径获得的。我们的综述认为,开放认知的潜力与其在气候教育中的应用之间存在显著的实施和研究差距。最值得注意的是,我们发现几乎完全缺乏对生态教学活动的认可框架,长期关注技术知识而不是变革的、以行动为导向的学习。我们建议未来的工作优先考虑为这些关键能力创建强大的、共同设计的评估模型,以弥合教育与有意义的气候行动之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital credentials for environmental competencies: A scoping review of open recognition systems in climate education.

Open education recognition systems are transforming how skills and competencies are validated across formal, informal, and non-formal learning environments. This scoping review examines current practices in open recognition systems-including micro-credentials, digital badges, and open educational resources (OER) completion certificates and participation badges-with particular emphasis on their application and potential in climate education. Following systematic search strategies across eight databases, we analyzed 70 publications (2010-2024) comprising journal articles, book chapters, institutional reports, and conference proceedings to map existing evidence, identify key concepts, and uncover gaps in applying these systems to climate education. The analysis reveals that while these systems have significant potential to bridge academic learning with professional demands and environmental action, their impact is limited by persistent challenges: lack of definitional consistency and quality-assurance standards across institutions; significant technological barriers to credential portability and verification; and lack of awareness and trust from employers, undermining these credentials' currency in the labor market. Despite these challenges, notable findings include the growing importance of micro-credentials for validating climate adaptation skills, the value of open badges in recognizing interdisciplinary competencies essential for environmental action, and the need for integrated qualification frameworks that can accommodate both formal and informal learning pathways in sustainability education. This integration is critical for validating the interdisciplinary and action-oriented skills demanded by the green economy, often acquired through the non-formal and informal learning pathways characteristic of environmental action and advocacy. Our review concludes that a significant implementation and research gap exists between open recognition's potential and its application in climate education. Most notably, we find a near-complete absence of recognition frameworks for eco-pedagogical activities, perpetuating focus on technical knowledge over transformative, action-oriented learning. We recommend that future work prioritize creating robust, co-designed assessment models for these critical competencies to bridge the gap between education and meaningful climate action.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信