超声引导直立者脊柱平面阻滞在无器械脊柱手术术后镇痛中的无效:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。

IF 2.5 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain & spine Pub Date : 2025-08-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2025.104379
Guillaume Lonjon, Nicolas Ross, Alexandre Dhenin, Matthieu Vassal, Anne Gourari, Nicolas Bouic, Aurélien Bonnal
{"title":"超声引导直立者脊柱平面阻滞在无器械脊柱手术术后镇痛中的无效:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。","authors":"Guillaume Lonjon, Nicolas Ross, Alexandre Dhenin, Matthieu Vassal, Anne Gourari, Nicolas Bouic, Aurélien Bonnal","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative pain management is a challenge after lumbar spine surgery. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is one solution and seems to limit opioid consumption after lumbar fusion. This RCT explored the effectiveness of ESP block versus placebo in non-instrumented spine surgery within an ERAS program.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>The hypothesis suggested the superiority of ESP block across all endpoints, emphasizing its potential as a safe and effective element.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial using a 1:1 allocation with an intent-to-treat, patients undergoing non-fusion lumbar surgery for one or two levels were included from January to November 2022. Ultrasound-guided ESP block was performed by an anesthesiologist injecting levobupivacaine or saline solution (placebo). The primary outcome was total morphine consumption at 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 100 individuals (50 in each arm). Total morphine consumption at 72 h did not differ between the ESP block and placebo groups, nor did cumulative pain score, intraoperative sufentanil administration, 1-month ODI and pain scores. In the daily analysis, morphine consumption was greater in the placebo group at day 0, and in the ESP block group from day 1 to day 3, without significance. The pain scores throughout the first 72 postoperative hours were <3/10 in both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The groups did not differ in morphine consumption at 72 h postoperatively. Increased morphine dose after the first 24 h in the ESP block group could suggest a rebound effect. In patients undergoing non-instrumented spine surgery, the ESP block does not confer additional analgesic benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"5 ","pages":"104379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355981/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in postoperative analgesia of non-instrumented spine surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Guillaume Lonjon, Nicolas Ross, Alexandre Dhenin, Matthieu Vassal, Anne Gourari, Nicolas Bouic, Aurélien Bonnal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2025.104379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative pain management is a challenge after lumbar spine surgery. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is one solution and seems to limit opioid consumption after lumbar fusion. This RCT explored the effectiveness of ESP block versus placebo in non-instrumented spine surgery within an ERAS program.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>The hypothesis suggested the superiority of ESP block across all endpoints, emphasizing its potential as a safe and effective element.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial using a 1:1 allocation with an intent-to-treat, patients undergoing non-fusion lumbar surgery for one or two levels were included from January to November 2022. Ultrasound-guided ESP block was performed by an anesthesiologist injecting levobupivacaine or saline solution (placebo). The primary outcome was total morphine consumption at 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 100 individuals (50 in each arm). Total morphine consumption at 72 h did not differ between the ESP block and placebo groups, nor did cumulative pain score, intraoperative sufentanil administration, 1-month ODI and pain scores. In the daily analysis, morphine consumption was greater in the placebo group at day 0, and in the ESP block group from day 1 to day 3, without significance. The pain scores throughout the first 72 postoperative hours were <3/10 in both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The groups did not differ in morphine consumption at 72 h postoperatively. Increased morphine dose after the first 24 h in the ESP block group could suggest a rebound effect. In patients undergoing non-instrumented spine surgery, the ESP block does not confer additional analgesic benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"104379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355981/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104379\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2025.104379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腰椎手术后疼痛管理是一个挑战。竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞是一种解决方案,似乎可以限制腰椎融合术后阿片类药物的消耗。本随机对照试验探讨了在ERAS项目中,ESP阻滞与安慰剂在非器械脊柱手术中的有效性。研究问题:该假设表明ESP阻滞在所有端点上都具有优势,强调其作为一种安全有效的因素的潜力。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性、单中心、随机、双盲对照试验中,采用1:1分配,目的是治疗,在2022年1月至11月期间纳入了一或两个水平的非融合腰椎手术患者。超声引导下的ESP阻滞由麻醉师注射左布比卡因或生理盐水溶液(安慰剂)进行。主要结局是72h时吗啡总消耗量。结果:我们纳入了100例个体(每组50例)。在ESP阻断组和安慰剂组之间,72小时吗啡总用量没有差异,累积疼痛评分、术中舒芬太尼给药、1个月ODI和疼痛评分也没有差异。在日常分析中,安慰剂组在第0天的吗啡用量更大,而ESP阻断组在第1天至第3天的吗啡用量更大,但无统计学意义。讨论和结论:两组术后72小时吗啡用量无差异。ESP阻断组在24 h后增加吗啡剂量可能出现反弹效应。在接受非器械脊柱手术的患者中,ESP阻滞不能带来额外的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in postoperative analgesia of non-instrumented spine surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Introduction: Postoperative pain management is a challenge after lumbar spine surgery. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is one solution and seems to limit opioid consumption after lumbar fusion. This RCT explored the effectiveness of ESP block versus placebo in non-instrumented spine surgery within an ERAS program.

Research question: The hypothesis suggested the superiority of ESP block across all endpoints, emphasizing its potential as a safe and effective element.

Material and methods: In this prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial using a 1:1 allocation with an intent-to-treat, patients undergoing non-fusion lumbar surgery for one or two levels were included from January to November 2022. Ultrasound-guided ESP block was performed by an anesthesiologist injecting levobupivacaine or saline solution (placebo). The primary outcome was total morphine consumption at 72 h.

Results: We included 100 individuals (50 in each arm). Total morphine consumption at 72 h did not differ between the ESP block and placebo groups, nor did cumulative pain score, intraoperative sufentanil administration, 1-month ODI and pain scores. In the daily analysis, morphine consumption was greater in the placebo group at day 0, and in the ESP block group from day 1 to day 3, without significance. The pain scores throughout the first 72 postoperative hours were <3/10 in both groups.

Discussion and conclusion: The groups did not differ in morphine consumption at 72 h postoperatively. Increased morphine dose after the first 24 h in the ESP block group could suggest a rebound effect. In patients undergoing non-instrumented spine surgery, the ESP block does not confer additional analgesic benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信