Xingpeng Yang, Yuhui Pan, Pengyue Zhao, Ning Chen, Yizhao Ma, Yichen Bao, Lin Qi, Xiaohui Du
{"title":"红细胞分布宽度与白蛋白比在脓毒性恶性肿瘤患者中的预后价值:基于MIMIC-IV数据库的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Xingpeng Yang, Yuhui Pan, Pengyue Zhao, Ning Chen, Yizhao Ma, Yichen Bao, Lin Qi, Xiaohui Du","doi":"10.1177/00368504251370990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic value of red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR) in sepsis patients with malignancies and evaluate its association with in-hospital mortality.MethodsThe retrospective cohort study was conducted using data extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Participants were stratified into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on RAR levels measured within 24 hours of intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital all-cause mortality. Associations between RAR and clinical outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling. Predictive performance was further evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsA total of 1686 eligible patients were included. Multivariate Cox regression revealed a significant positive association between RAR and 28-day in-hospital mortality (adjusted model 3 HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.16, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a stepwise decline in survival with increasing RAR levels (28-day survival rate of 75.26% in Q1 vs. 49.88% in Q4, <i>P</i> < 0.001). RCS analysis identified a linear relationship between RAR and the hazard ratios for 28-day in-hospital mortality (<i>P</i> for nonlinearity > 0.05). ROC analysis showed that RAR (area under the curve = 0.624) yielded better prognostic utility than red blood cell distribution width and sequential organ failure assessment, with significant differences confirmed by DeLong's test. RAR also exhibited the best calibration (slope = 1.0109; Brier score = 0.2166) and the highest net clinical benefit in DCA (22%-95%; maximum = 0.162). Subgroup analysis showed consistent results across all groups (<i>P</i> for interaction > 0.05).ConclusionsRAR may serve as an independent prognostic indicator in septic patients with malignancies. Its elevation is significantly associated with increased mortality risk and may aid in the early identification of high-risk individuals and the implementation of targeted interventions. Further prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to validate its clinical applicability and dynamic monitoring potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":56061,"journal":{"name":"Science Progress","volume":"108 3","pages":"368504251370990"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio in septic patients with malignancies: A retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV database.\",\"authors\":\"Xingpeng Yang, Yuhui Pan, Pengyue Zhao, Ning Chen, Yizhao Ma, Yichen Bao, Lin Qi, Xiaohui Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00368504251370990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic value of red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR) in sepsis patients with malignancies and evaluate its association with in-hospital mortality.MethodsThe retrospective cohort study was conducted using data extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Participants were stratified into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on RAR levels measured within 24 hours of intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital all-cause mortality. Associations between RAR and clinical outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling. Predictive performance was further evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsA total of 1686 eligible patients were included. Multivariate Cox regression revealed a significant positive association between RAR and 28-day in-hospital mortality (adjusted model 3 HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.16, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a stepwise decline in survival with increasing RAR levels (28-day survival rate of 75.26% in Q1 vs. 49.88% in Q4, <i>P</i> < 0.001). RCS analysis identified a linear relationship between RAR and the hazard ratios for 28-day in-hospital mortality (<i>P</i> for nonlinearity > 0.05). ROC analysis showed that RAR (area under the curve = 0.624) yielded better prognostic utility than red blood cell distribution width and sequential organ failure assessment, with significant differences confirmed by DeLong's test. RAR also exhibited the best calibration (slope = 1.0109; Brier score = 0.2166) and the highest net clinical benefit in DCA (22%-95%; maximum = 0.162). Subgroup analysis showed consistent results across all groups (<i>P</i> for interaction > 0.05).ConclusionsRAR may serve as an independent prognostic indicator in septic patients with malignancies. Its elevation is significantly associated with increased mortality risk and may aid in the early identification of high-risk individuals and the implementation of targeted interventions. Further prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to validate its clinical applicability and dynamic monitoring potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science Progress\",\"volume\":\"108 3\",\"pages\":\"368504251370990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12365464/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251370990\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Progress","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504251370990","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨红细胞分布宽度与白蛋白比(RAR)在脓毒症合并恶性肿瘤患者中的预后价值,并评价其与住院死亡率的关系。方法采用重症监护医学信息市场(MIMIC-IV)数据库中的数据进行回顾性队列研究。根据重症监护室入院24小时内测量的RAR水平,将参与者分为四分位数(Q1-Q4)。主要终点是28天住院全因死亡率。使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析、多变量Cox比例风险回归和限制性三次样条(RCS)模型评估RAR与临床结果之间的关系。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)进一步评价预测效果。结果共纳入1686例符合条件的患者。多因素Cox回归显示RAR与住院28天死亡率显著正相关(调整后的模型3 HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.16, P P P为非线性bb0 0.05)。ROC分析显示,RAR(曲线下面积= 0.624)比红细胞分布宽度和序贯器官衰竭评估具有更好的预后效用,DeLong检验证实了差异的显著性。RAR还表现出最佳的校准(斜率= 1.0109;Brier评分= 0.2166)和最高的净临床效益(22%-95%;最大值= 0.162)。亚组分析显示各组结果一致(P < 0.05)。结论srar可作为脓毒症合并恶性肿瘤患者的独立预后指标。它的升高与死亡风险增加显著相关,可能有助于早期识别高风险个体和实施有针对性的干预措施。需要进一步的前瞻性多中心研究来验证其临床适用性和动态监测潜力。
Prognostic value of red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio in septic patients with malignancies: A retrospective cohort study based on the MIMIC-IV database.
ObjectiveTo investigate the prognostic value of red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR) in sepsis patients with malignancies and evaluate its association with in-hospital mortality.MethodsThe retrospective cohort study was conducted using data extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Participants were stratified into quartiles (Q1-Q4) based on RAR levels measured within 24 hours of intensive care unit admission. The primary outcome was 28-day in-hospital all-cause mortality. Associations between RAR and clinical outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling. Predictive performance was further evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsA total of 1686 eligible patients were included. Multivariate Cox regression revealed a significant positive association between RAR and 28-day in-hospital mortality (adjusted model 3 HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.16, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated a stepwise decline in survival with increasing RAR levels (28-day survival rate of 75.26% in Q1 vs. 49.88% in Q4, P < 0.001). RCS analysis identified a linear relationship between RAR and the hazard ratios for 28-day in-hospital mortality (P for nonlinearity > 0.05). ROC analysis showed that RAR (area under the curve = 0.624) yielded better prognostic utility than red blood cell distribution width and sequential organ failure assessment, with significant differences confirmed by DeLong's test. RAR also exhibited the best calibration (slope = 1.0109; Brier score = 0.2166) and the highest net clinical benefit in DCA (22%-95%; maximum = 0.162). Subgroup analysis showed consistent results across all groups (P for interaction > 0.05).ConclusionsRAR may serve as an independent prognostic indicator in septic patients with malignancies. Its elevation is significantly associated with increased mortality risk and may aid in the early identification of high-risk individuals and the implementation of targeted interventions. Further prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to validate its clinical applicability and dynamic monitoring potential.
期刊介绍:
Science Progress has for over 100 years been a highly regarded review publication in science, technology and medicine. Its objective is to excite the readers'' interest in areas with which they may not be fully familiar but which could facilitate their interest, or even activity, in a cognate field.