【对针刺方向选择与报告现状的反思与建议】。

中国针灸 Pub Date : 2025-08-12 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240626-k0001
Hongbo Jia, Yibing Li, Kangchen Lei, Wenyi Ge, Wei Liu, Songjiao Li, Shuwen Shi, Yutong Dong, Congcong Ma, Li Li, Jian Liu, Xiaonong Fan
{"title":"【对针刺方向选择与报告现状的反思与建议】。","authors":"Hongbo Jia, Yibing Li, Kangchen Lei, Wenyi Ge, Wei Liu, Songjiao Li, Shuwen Shi, Yutong Dong, Congcong Ma, Li Li, Jian Liu, Xiaonong Fan","doi":"10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240626-k0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding acupuncture direction published from January 1st, 2013, to November 7th, 2023 were searched in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and VIP Chinese Journal Database. As a result, 21 RCTs were included. The problems identified included conceptual misunderstandings regarding acupuncture direction, incomplete selection strategies, confounding research factors, and inaccuracies in reporting. Based on the findings, four strategic approaches for enhancing therapeutic efficacy through acupuncture direction were summarized: aligning needle direction with the meridian pathway, directing the needle toward the lesion site, orienting the needle toward adjacent acupoints, and targeting special anatomical structures. Two additional strategies were proposed for optimizing the procedure: simplifying acupuncture operations and directing the needle toward safe anatomical sites. Recommendations were made to improve the rationality of research factor settings and the completeness of acupuncture operation reporting. Furthermore, three methods for reporting acupuncture direction were discussed: reporting the tip-pointed position, reporting the insertion angle and orientation, and reporting azimuth and polar angles, aiming to promote greater standardization and completeness in acupuncture practice and reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":69903,"journal":{"name":"中国针灸","volume":"45 8","pages":"1187-1194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reflection and recommendation on the current status of acupuncture direction selection and reporting].\",\"authors\":\"Hongbo Jia, Yibing Li, Kangchen Lei, Wenyi Ge, Wei Liu, Songjiao Li, Shuwen Shi, Yutong Dong, Congcong Ma, Li Li, Jian Liu, Xiaonong Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240626-k0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding acupuncture direction published from January 1st, 2013, to November 7th, 2023 were searched in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and VIP Chinese Journal Database. As a result, 21 RCTs were included. The problems identified included conceptual misunderstandings regarding acupuncture direction, incomplete selection strategies, confounding research factors, and inaccuracies in reporting. Based on the findings, four strategic approaches for enhancing therapeutic efficacy through acupuncture direction were summarized: aligning needle direction with the meridian pathway, directing the needle toward the lesion site, orienting the needle toward adjacent acupoints, and targeting special anatomical structures. Two additional strategies were proposed for optimizing the procedure: simplifying acupuncture operations and directing the needle toward safe anatomical sites. Recommendations were made to improve the rationality of research factor settings and the completeness of acupuncture operation reporting. Furthermore, three methods for reporting acupuncture direction were discussed: reporting the tip-pointed position, reporting the insertion angle and orientation, and reporting azimuth and polar angles, aiming to promote greater standardization and completeness in acupuncture practice and reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国针灸\",\"volume\":\"45 8\",\"pages\":\"1187-1194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国针灸\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240626-k0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国针灸","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13703/j.0255-2930.20240626-k0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据知识服务平台和VIP中文期刊数据库,检索2013年1月1日至2023年11月7日发表的有关针灸方向的随机对照试验(RCTs)。结果纳入21项随机对照试验。确定的问题包括对针灸方向的概念误解、不完整的选择策略、混淆研究因素和报告不准确。在此基础上,总结了针刺方向提高治疗效果的四种策略:使针刺方向与经络路径一致、针刺指向病变部位、针刺指向邻近穴位、针刺针对特殊解剖结构。另外提出了两种策略来优化程序:简化针灸操作和将针指向安全的解剖部位。并就如何提高研究因素设置的合理性和针灸手术报告的完整性提出建议。进一步探讨了针刺方向报告的三种方法:针尖位置报告、插入角度和方位报告、方位角和极角报告,旨在促进针刺实践和报告的规范化和完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Reflection and recommendation on the current status of acupuncture direction selection and reporting].

The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding acupuncture direction published from January 1st, 2013, to November 7th, 2023 were searched in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform, and VIP Chinese Journal Database. As a result, 21 RCTs were included. The problems identified included conceptual misunderstandings regarding acupuncture direction, incomplete selection strategies, confounding research factors, and inaccuracies in reporting. Based on the findings, four strategic approaches for enhancing therapeutic efficacy through acupuncture direction were summarized: aligning needle direction with the meridian pathway, directing the needle toward the lesion site, orienting the needle toward adjacent acupoints, and targeting special anatomical structures. Two additional strategies were proposed for optimizing the procedure: simplifying acupuncture operations and directing the needle toward safe anatomical sites. Recommendations were made to improve the rationality of research factor settings and the completeness of acupuncture operation reporting. Furthermore, three methods for reporting acupuncture direction were discussed: reporting the tip-pointed position, reporting the insertion angle and orientation, and reporting azimuth and polar angles, aiming to promote greater standardization and completeness in acupuncture practice and reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18644
期刊介绍: Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion (founded in 1981, monthly) is an authoritative academic journal of acupuncture and moxibustion under the supervision of China Association for Science and Technology and co-sponsored by Chinese Acupuncture and Moxibustion Society and Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion of China Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine. It is recognised as a core journal of Chinese science and technology, a core journal of Chinese language, and is included in the core journals of China Science Citation Database, as well as being included in MEDLINE and other international well-known medical index databases. The journal adheres to the tenet of ‘improving, taking into account the popularity, colourful and realistic’, and provides valuable learning and communication opportunities for the majority of acupuncture and moxibustion clinical and scientific research workers, and plays an important role in the domestic and international publicity and promotion of acupuncture and moxibustion disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信