痴呆的跨文化功能评估:综述。

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clara Calia, Freddie O'Donald, Sanne Franzen, Alfonso Delgado Alvarez, Anna Jane Dreyer, Inmaculada Ibanez-Casas, Jessica Jiang, Julia C Daugherty, Magda Jordao, Marco Canevelli, Naaheed Mukadam, Pauline Narme, T Rune Nielsen, Simone Pomati, Tamlyn Watermeyer, Vaitsa Giannouli
{"title":"痴呆的跨文化功能评估:综述。","authors":"Clara Calia, Freddie O'Donald, Sanne Franzen, Alfonso Delgado Alvarez, Anna Jane Dreyer, Inmaculada Ibanez-Casas, Jessica Jiang, Julia C Daugherty, Magda Jordao, Marco Canevelli, Naaheed Mukadam, Pauline Narme, T Rune Nielsen, Simone Pomati, Tamlyn Watermeyer, Vaitsa Giannouli","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2543913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Dementia diagnosis relies on assessing functional decline, yet widely used assessment tools are often developed in Euro-American contexts, limiting their cross-cultural validity. This commentary highlights key challenges in functional assessment across cultures and proposes a framework for enhancing their applicability and equity.</p><p><p><b>Method:</b> We critically examine methodological limitations in current functional assessment tools, including poor cultural adaptability, inadequate validation processes, and limited stakeholder engagement. Drawing on existing literature, we propose a multidimensional framework integrating cultural perceptions, robust adaptation strategies, and participatory approaches to improve assessment relevance.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Functional assessments must balance cultural specificity with broad applicability to ensure accurate dementia detection across diverse populations. Identifying transcultural markers of functional decline, engaging local communities, and systematically adapting tools through rigorous validation will enhance their diagnostic utility. A culturally inclusive approach to functional assessment can reduce disparities in dementia diagnosis and care worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-cultural functional assessment for dementia: A commentary.\",\"authors\":\"Clara Calia, Freddie O'Donald, Sanne Franzen, Alfonso Delgado Alvarez, Anna Jane Dreyer, Inmaculada Ibanez-Casas, Jessica Jiang, Julia C Daugherty, Magda Jordao, Marco Canevelli, Naaheed Mukadam, Pauline Narme, T Rune Nielsen, Simone Pomati, Tamlyn Watermeyer, Vaitsa Giannouli\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2025.2543913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Dementia diagnosis relies on assessing functional decline, yet widely used assessment tools are often developed in Euro-American contexts, limiting their cross-cultural validity. This commentary highlights key challenges in functional assessment across cultures and proposes a framework for enhancing their applicability and equity.</p><p><p><b>Method:</b> We critically examine methodological limitations in current functional assessment tools, including poor cultural adaptability, inadequate validation processes, and limited stakeholder engagement. Drawing on existing literature, we propose a multidimensional framework integrating cultural perceptions, robust adaptation strategies, and participatory approaches to improve assessment relevance.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Functional assessments must balance cultural specificity with broad applicability to ensure accurate dementia detection across diverse populations. Identifying transcultural markers of functional decline, engaging local communities, and systematically adapting tools through rigorous validation will enhance their diagnostic utility. A culturally inclusive approach to functional assessment can reduce disparities in dementia diagnosis and care worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2543913\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2543913","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:痴呆症的诊断依赖于评估功能衰退,然而广泛使用的评估工具往往是在欧美背景下开发的,限制了它们的跨文化有效性。这篇评论强调了跨文化功能评估的主要挑战,并提出了一个框架,以提高其适用性和公平性。方法:我们批判性地考察了当前功能评估工具的方法局限性,包括文化适应性差、验证过程不足和利益相关者参与有限。在现有文献的基础上,我们提出了一个多维框架,将文化观念、稳健的适应策略和参与性方法整合在一起,以提高评估的相关性。结论:功能评估必须平衡文化特异性和广泛适用性,以确保在不同人群中准确检测痴呆症。识别功能衰退的跨文化标志,参与当地社区,并通过严格的验证系统地调整工具,将增强其诊断效用。一种文化包容性的功能评估方法可以减少世界范围内痴呆诊断和护理的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-cultural functional assessment for dementia: A commentary.

Objective: Dementia diagnosis relies on assessing functional decline, yet widely used assessment tools are often developed in Euro-American contexts, limiting their cross-cultural validity. This commentary highlights key challenges in functional assessment across cultures and proposes a framework for enhancing their applicability and equity.

Method: We critically examine methodological limitations in current functional assessment tools, including poor cultural adaptability, inadequate validation processes, and limited stakeholder engagement. Drawing on existing literature, we propose a multidimensional framework integrating cultural perceptions, robust adaptation strategies, and participatory approaches to improve assessment relevance.

Conclusions: Functional assessments must balance cultural specificity with broad applicability to ensure accurate dementia detection across diverse populations. Identifying transcultural markers of functional decline, engaging local communities, and systematically adapting tools through rigorous validation will enhance their diagnostic utility. A culturally inclusive approach to functional assessment can reduce disparities in dementia diagnosis and care worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信