社会资本理论与计量的定量方法:灾害文献焦点。

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Natural Hazards Review Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2009
Seonju Jang, Galen Newman, Michelle Meyer, Shannon Van Zandt
{"title":"社会资本理论与计量的定量方法:灾害文献焦点。","authors":"Seonju Jang, Galen Newman, Michelle Meyer, Shannon Van Zandt","doi":"10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disaster recovery depends heavily on the support of social networks and the resources they can generate. Yet such support is difficult to measure and assess. This paper reviews existing quantitative approaches to measure social capital within a disaster context. The article addresses (1) how is social capital conceptualized in the disaster literature? and (2) what social capital measures have been used based on existing conceptual frameworks (e.g., bonding, bridging, and linking)? We review how social capital has been defined and what properties of social capital make it important in the disaster planning contexts. Then we explore and assess existing approaches used to measure social capital while offering suggestions for potential improvements. These potential improvements to social capital indices will capture and measure social capital in a more comprehensive way and have a more solid theoretical basis based on the social capital and disaster resilience literature. Each type of social capital is expected to have different consequences and effects on disaster planning processes and phases; therefore, it is important to distinguish and measure social capital variables in a holistic way for policymakers and practitioners to make use of social capital information in preparing for disasters.</p>","PeriodicalId":51262,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards Review","volume":"25 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Capital Theory and Quantitative Approaches in Measurements: Disaster Literature Focus.\",\"authors\":\"Seonju Jang, Galen Newman, Michelle Meyer, Shannon Van Zandt\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Disaster recovery depends heavily on the support of social networks and the resources they can generate. Yet such support is difficult to measure and assess. This paper reviews existing quantitative approaches to measure social capital within a disaster context. The article addresses (1) how is social capital conceptualized in the disaster literature? and (2) what social capital measures have been used based on existing conceptual frameworks (e.g., bonding, bridging, and linking)? We review how social capital has been defined and what properties of social capital make it important in the disaster planning contexts. Then we explore and assess existing approaches used to measure social capital while offering suggestions for potential improvements. These potential improvements to social capital indices will capture and measure social capital in a more comprehensive way and have a more solid theoretical basis based on the social capital and disaster resilience literature. Each type of social capital is expected to have different consequences and effects on disaster planning processes and phases; therefore, it is important to distinguish and measure social capital variables in a holistic way for policymakers and practitioners to make use of social capital information in preparing for disasters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Hazards Review\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356100/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Hazards Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/nhrefo.nheng-2009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灾难恢复在很大程度上取决于社会网络的支持及其所能产生的资源。然而,这种支持是难以衡量和评估的。本文回顾了现有的定量方法来衡量灾害背景下的社会资本。这篇文章讨论了(1)社会资本在灾难文献中是如何概念化的?(2)基于现有的概念框架(例如,结合、桥接和连接),使用了哪些社会资本措施?我们回顾了社会资本是如何定义的,以及社会资本的哪些属性使得它在灾难规划环境中很重要。然后,我们探索和评估用于衡量社会资本的现有方法,同时为潜在的改进提供建议。这些社会资本指数的潜在改进将更全面地捕捉和衡量社会资本,并在社会资本和灾害恢复力文献的基础上具有更坚实的理论基础。预计每种社会资本对灾害规划过程和阶段会产生不同的后果和影响;因此,对社会资本变量进行整体区分和衡量,对于政策制定者和实践者在防灾准备中利用社会资本信息具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Capital Theory and Quantitative Approaches in Measurements: Disaster Literature Focus.

Disaster recovery depends heavily on the support of social networks and the resources they can generate. Yet such support is difficult to measure and assess. This paper reviews existing quantitative approaches to measure social capital within a disaster context. The article addresses (1) how is social capital conceptualized in the disaster literature? and (2) what social capital measures have been used based on existing conceptual frameworks (e.g., bonding, bridging, and linking)? We review how social capital has been defined and what properties of social capital make it important in the disaster planning contexts. Then we explore and assess existing approaches used to measure social capital while offering suggestions for potential improvements. These potential improvements to social capital indices will capture and measure social capital in a more comprehensive way and have a more solid theoretical basis based on the social capital and disaster resilience literature. Each type of social capital is expected to have different consequences and effects on disaster planning processes and phases; therefore, it is important to distinguish and measure social capital variables in a holistic way for policymakers and practitioners to make use of social capital information in preparing for disasters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Hazards Review
Natural Hazards Review ENGINEERING, CIVIL-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.40%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Natural Hazards Review addresses the range of events, processes, and consequences that occur when natural hazards interact with the physical, social, economic, and engineered dimensions of communities and the people who live, work, and play in them. As these conditions interact and change, the impact on human communities increases in size, scale, and scope. Such interactions necessarily need to be analyzed from an interdisciplinary perspective that includes both social and technical measures. For decision makers, the risk presents the challenge of managing known hazards, but unknown consequences in time of occurrence, scale of impact, and level of disruption in actual communities with limited resources. The journal is dedicated to bringing together the physical, social, and behavioral sciences; engineering; and the regulatory and policy environments to provide a forum for cutting edge, holistic, and cross-disciplinary approaches to anticipating risk, loss, and cost reduction from natural hazards. The journal welcomes rigorous research on the intersection between social and technical systems that advances concepts of resilience within lifeline and infrastructure systems and the organizations that manage them for all hazards. It offers a professional forum for researchers and practitioners working together to publish the results of truly interdisciplinary and partnered approaches to the anticipation of risk, loss reduction, and community resilience. Engineering topics covered include the characterization of hazard forces and the planning, design, construction, maintenance, performance, and use of structures in the physical environment. Social and behavioral sciences topics include analysis of the impact of hazards on communities and the organizations that seek to mitigate and manage response to hazards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信