棱镜镜对外科医生术中体力负荷及手术室肌肉骨骼不适的影响。

IF 2.4 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Liyun Yang, Xuelong Fan, Melanie Hensel, Mikael Forsman, Magnus Kjellman
{"title":"棱镜镜对外科医生术中体力负荷及手术室肌肉骨骼不适的影响。","authors":"Liyun Yang, Xuelong Fan, Melanie Hensel, Mikael Forsman, Magnus Kjellman","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2534589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous study showed that surgical prismatic loupes improved surgeon physical workload and neck discomfort in a lab setting. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of prismatic loupes in operating room. Fifteen surgeons performed two similar operations (median duration of 54 minutes) using prismatic and conventional loupes. The muscle activities and work postures were recorded. Questionnaires including body part discomfort and usability were completed. Compared to conventional loupes, prismatic loupes led to a significant decrease in muscle activity levels in the upper trapezius and neck extensors, head forward bending, and neck pain postoperatively (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Most surgeons reported high usability scores for the prismatic loupes. The study showed that surgical prismatic loupes can improve surgeons' intraoperative physical workload and musculoskeletal discomfort in real surgeries in short term. Future studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of using prismatic loupes on surgeon well-being and surgical performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of prismatic loupes on surgeons' intraoperative physical workload and musculoskeletal discomfort in operating room.\",\"authors\":\"Liyun Yang, Xuelong Fan, Melanie Hensel, Mikael Forsman, Magnus Kjellman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2534589\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous study showed that surgical prismatic loupes improved surgeon physical workload and neck discomfort in a lab setting. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of prismatic loupes in operating room. Fifteen surgeons performed two similar operations (median duration of 54 minutes) using prismatic and conventional loupes. The muscle activities and work postures were recorded. Questionnaires including body part discomfort and usability were completed. Compared to conventional loupes, prismatic loupes led to a significant decrease in muscle activity levels in the upper trapezius and neck extensors, head forward bending, and neck pain postoperatively (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Most surgeons reported high usability scores for the prismatic loupes. The study showed that surgical prismatic loupes can improve surgeons' intraoperative physical workload and musculoskeletal discomfort in real surgeries in short term. Future studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of using prismatic loupes on surgeon well-being and surgical performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2534589\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2534589","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,在实验室环境下,手术棱镜镜可以改善外科医生的体力负荷和颈部不适。然而,关于棱镜镜在手术室中的作用,目前的认识有限。15位外科医生使用棱镜镜和常规镜进行了两次类似的手术(平均持续时间54分钟)。记录肌肉活动和工作姿势。问卷包括身体部位不适和可用性。与常规镜检相比,棱镜镜检导致上斜方肌和颈部伸肌肌肉活动水平显著降低,头部前屈,术后颈部疼痛(均p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of prismatic loupes on surgeons' intraoperative physical workload and musculoskeletal discomfort in operating room.

Previous study showed that surgical prismatic loupes improved surgeon physical workload and neck discomfort in a lab setting. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the effects of prismatic loupes in operating room. Fifteen surgeons performed two similar operations (median duration of 54 minutes) using prismatic and conventional loupes. The muscle activities and work postures were recorded. Questionnaires including body part discomfort and usability were completed. Compared to conventional loupes, prismatic loupes led to a significant decrease in muscle activity levels in the upper trapezius and neck extensors, head forward bending, and neck pain postoperatively (all p < 0.05). Most surgeons reported high usability scores for the prismatic loupes. The study showed that surgical prismatic loupes can improve surgeons' intraoperative physical workload and musculoskeletal discomfort in real surgeries in short term. Future studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of using prismatic loupes on surgeon well-being and surgical performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信