{"title":"实习环境和工作特征对长期护理机构护士及护工无力感的影响。","authors":"Rong-Fang Shih, Hsiang-Chu Pai","doi":"10.1111/nhs.70210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to compare the differences in professional environment, job characteristics, and feelings of powerlessness between nurses and nurse aides (NAs) in residential long-term care institutions, and to analyze the predictors of powerlessness. This study employed a comparative and correlational design, utilizing convenience sampling. Participants were recruited from 24 residential long-term care institutions in central Taiwan between April 2023 and March 2024. The research tools included a Practice Environment Survey Scale, a Work Design Questionnaire, and a Powerlessness Scale. A total of 338 participants (156 nurses and 182 NAs) took part in this study. Both nurses and NAs reported moderate to low levels of powerlessness, with average scores of 42.18 and 37.07, respectively. However, nurses experienced more powerlessness than NAs (t = 3.046, p = 0.003). Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that professional environment (β = -0.381, p < 0.01) and job characteristics (β = -0.285, p = 0.005) were significant predictors of powerlessness among nurses, explaining 41.7% of the variance. In contrast, the only predictor of powerlessness for NAs was the professional environment (β = -0.695, p < 0.001), which explained 42.4% of the variance.</p>","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"27 3","pages":"e70210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359288/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Practice Environment and Job Characteristics on Nurses and Nurse Aides' Feelings of Powerlessness in Residential Long-Term Care Institutions.\",\"authors\":\"Rong-Fang Shih, Hsiang-Chu Pai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nhs.70210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to compare the differences in professional environment, job characteristics, and feelings of powerlessness between nurses and nurse aides (NAs) in residential long-term care institutions, and to analyze the predictors of powerlessness. This study employed a comparative and correlational design, utilizing convenience sampling. Participants were recruited from 24 residential long-term care institutions in central Taiwan between April 2023 and March 2024. The research tools included a Practice Environment Survey Scale, a Work Design Questionnaire, and a Powerlessness Scale. A total of 338 participants (156 nurses and 182 NAs) took part in this study. Both nurses and NAs reported moderate to low levels of powerlessness, with average scores of 42.18 and 37.07, respectively. However, nurses experienced more powerlessness than NAs (t = 3.046, p = 0.003). Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that professional environment (β = -0.381, p < 0.01) and job characteristics (β = -0.285, p = 0.005) were significant predictors of powerlessness among nurses, explaining 41.7% of the variance. In contrast, the only predictor of powerlessness for NAs was the professional environment (β = -0.695, p < 0.001), which explained 42.4% of the variance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing & Health Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"e70210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359288/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing & Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70210\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70210","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在比较住院长期照护机构护理人员与护理员在专业环境、工作特征、无助感等方面的差异,并分析其无助感的预测因素。本研究采用比较和相关设计,利用方便抽样。参与者于2023年4月至2024年3月期间从台湾中部的24家住宿长期护理机构招募。研究工具包括实践环境调查量表、工作设计问卷和无力感量表。共有338名参与者(156名护士和182名护士)参加了本研究。护士和NAs都报告了中低程度的无力感,平均得分分别为42.18分和37.07分。然而,护士比NAs有更多的无力感(t = 3.046, p = 0.003)。层次回归分析显示,职业环境(β = -0.381, p
The Effects of Practice Environment and Job Characteristics on Nurses and Nurse Aides' Feelings of Powerlessness in Residential Long-Term Care Institutions.
This study aims to compare the differences in professional environment, job characteristics, and feelings of powerlessness between nurses and nurse aides (NAs) in residential long-term care institutions, and to analyze the predictors of powerlessness. This study employed a comparative and correlational design, utilizing convenience sampling. Participants were recruited from 24 residential long-term care institutions in central Taiwan between April 2023 and March 2024. The research tools included a Practice Environment Survey Scale, a Work Design Questionnaire, and a Powerlessness Scale. A total of 338 participants (156 nurses and 182 NAs) took part in this study. Both nurses and NAs reported moderate to low levels of powerlessness, with average scores of 42.18 and 37.07, respectively. However, nurses experienced more powerlessness than NAs (t = 3.046, p = 0.003). Hierarchical regression analysis indicated that professional environment (β = -0.381, p < 0.01) and job characteristics (β = -0.285, p = 0.005) were significant predictors of powerlessness among nurses, explaining 41.7% of the variance. In contrast, the only predictor of powerlessness for NAs was the professional environment (β = -0.695, p < 0.001), which explained 42.4% of the variance.
期刊介绍:
NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.