全国成人职业治疗从业人员认知评价调查。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Anna E Boone, Timothy S Marks, Timothy J Wolf, Gordon M Giles, Dorothy Farrar-Edwards
{"title":"全国成人职业治疗从业人员认知评价调查。","authors":"Anna E Boone, Timothy S Marks, Timothy J Wolf, Gordon M Giles, Dorothy Farrar-Edwards","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2025.051113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cognitive skills play a central role in a person's independent community functioning. As a profession, occupational therapy practitioners need to understand how cognitive evaluation is incorporated into the overall provision of occupational therapy services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe occupational therapy practitioners' current practice for evaluating cognitive function in adults across treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey conducted from September 2022 to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Web-based survey distributed through online platforms, direct e-mail invitations, and in person through flyer distribution.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Four hundred forty-six licensed occupational therapy practitioners with at least 6 mo of experience in adult treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most occupational therapy practitioners evaluate cognition using clinical judgment rather than neurocognitive screening measures, χ2(9) = 52.39, p < .001; or functional cognitive measures, χ2(9) = 77.49, p < .001. More occupational therapy practitioners evaluate cognition using neurocognitive screening measures rather than functional cognitive measures, χ2(9) = 68.63, p < .001. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (25.6%) was the most used standardized neurocognitive measure, and the Allen Cognitive Level Screen (15.2%) was the most widely used standardized functional cognitive measure. Various factors (e.g., time required for use, cost, ongoing peer or administrative support) were perceived to affect the selection and use of measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Occupational therapy practitioners primarily use unstandardized methods to evaluate cognition. When standardized measures are used, neurocognitive measures were used more frequently than functional cognitive measures. Occupational therapy practitioners report that comprehensive evaluation of cognition includes information derived from a variety of sources. Plain-Language Summary: In this study, we describe the current practices of occupational therapy practitioners for evaluating cognitive function in adults. We found that occupational therapy practitioners most often evaluate cognition using unstandardized methods. Standardized paper-and-pencil neurocognitive measures are used more often than functional cognitive measures that observe a person's ability to perform practical real-world tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"79 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A National Survey of Occupational Therapy Practitioners' Evaluation of Cognition in Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Anna E Boone, Timothy S Marks, Timothy J Wolf, Gordon M Giles, Dorothy Farrar-Edwards\",\"doi\":\"10.5014/ajot.2025.051113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cognitive skills play a central role in a person's independent community functioning. As a profession, occupational therapy practitioners need to understand how cognitive evaluation is incorporated into the overall provision of occupational therapy services.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe occupational therapy practitioners' current practice for evaluating cognitive function in adults across treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional survey conducted from September 2022 to September 2023.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Web-based survey distributed through online platforms, direct e-mail invitations, and in person through flyer distribution.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Four hundred forty-six licensed occupational therapy practitioners with at least 6 mo of experience in adult treatment settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most occupational therapy practitioners evaluate cognition using clinical judgment rather than neurocognitive screening measures, χ2(9) = 52.39, p < .001; or functional cognitive measures, χ2(9) = 77.49, p < .001. More occupational therapy practitioners evaluate cognition using neurocognitive screening measures rather than functional cognitive measures, χ2(9) = 68.63, p < .001. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (25.6%) was the most used standardized neurocognitive measure, and the Allen Cognitive Level Screen (15.2%) was the most widely used standardized functional cognitive measure. Various factors (e.g., time required for use, cost, ongoing peer or administrative support) were perceived to affect the selection and use of measures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Occupational therapy practitioners primarily use unstandardized methods to evaluate cognition. When standardized measures are used, neurocognitive measures were used more frequently than functional cognitive measures. Occupational therapy practitioners report that comprehensive evaluation of cognition includes information derived from a variety of sources. Plain-Language Summary: In this study, we describe the current practices of occupational therapy practitioners for evaluating cognitive function in adults. We found that occupational therapy practitioners most often evaluate cognition using unstandardized methods. Standardized paper-and-pencil neurocognitive measures are used more often than functional cognitive measures that observe a person's ability to perform practical real-world tasks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"79 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.051113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2025.051113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:认知技能在一个人独立的社区功能中起着核心作用。作为一种职业,职业治疗从业者需要了解如何将认知评估纳入职业治疗服务的整体提供。目的:描述职业治疗从业者目前评估成人认知功能的做法。设计:横断面调查,时间为2022年9月至2023年9月。设置:基于网络的调查,通过在线平台分发,直接电子邮件邀请,以及通过传单分发。参与者:446名持证职业治疗从业人员,在成人治疗环境中至少有6个月的经验。结果:大多数职业治疗从业人员使用临床判断评估认知,而非神经认知筛查措施,χ2(9) = 52.39, p结论及相关性:职业治疗从业人员主要使用非标准化的认知评估方法。当使用标准化测量时,神经认知测量比功能认知测量更频繁地使用。职业治疗从业者报告,认知的综合评估包括来自各种来源的信息。摘要:在这项研究中,我们描述了目前职业治疗从业者评估成人认知功能的做法。我们发现,职业治疗从业者通常使用非标准化的方法来评估认知。标准化的纸笔神经认知测量比功能性认知测量更常用,后者观察一个人执行实际任务的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A National Survey of Occupational Therapy Practitioners' Evaluation of Cognition in Adults.

Importance: Cognitive skills play a central role in a person's independent community functioning. As a profession, occupational therapy practitioners need to understand how cognitive evaluation is incorporated into the overall provision of occupational therapy services.

Objective: To describe occupational therapy practitioners' current practice for evaluating cognitive function in adults across treatment settings.

Design: A cross-sectional survey conducted from September 2022 to September 2023.

Setting: Web-based survey distributed through online platforms, direct e-mail invitations, and in person through flyer distribution.

Participants: Four hundred forty-six licensed occupational therapy practitioners with at least 6 mo of experience in adult treatment settings.

Results: Most occupational therapy practitioners evaluate cognition using clinical judgment rather than neurocognitive screening measures, χ2(9) = 52.39, p < .001; or functional cognitive measures, χ2(9) = 77.49, p < .001. More occupational therapy practitioners evaluate cognition using neurocognitive screening measures rather than functional cognitive measures, χ2(9) = 68.63, p < .001. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (25.6%) was the most used standardized neurocognitive measure, and the Allen Cognitive Level Screen (15.2%) was the most widely used standardized functional cognitive measure. Various factors (e.g., time required for use, cost, ongoing peer or administrative support) were perceived to affect the selection and use of measures.

Conclusions and relevance: Occupational therapy practitioners primarily use unstandardized methods to evaluate cognition. When standardized measures are used, neurocognitive measures were used more frequently than functional cognitive measures. Occupational therapy practitioners report that comprehensive evaluation of cognition includes information derived from a variety of sources. Plain-Language Summary: In this study, we describe the current practices of occupational therapy practitioners for evaluating cognitive function in adults. We found that occupational therapy practitioners most often evaluate cognition using unstandardized methods. Standardized paper-and-pencil neurocognitive measures are used more often than functional cognitive measures that observe a person's ability to perform practical real-world tasks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
406
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信