比较同性女性伴侣使用伴侣的卵子与自己的卵子进行体外受精的结果:一项系统综述。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elizabeth Choong, Phoebe Barry, Susan Bewley, Catherine Meads
{"title":"比较同性女性伴侣使用伴侣的卵子与自己的卵子进行体外受精的结果:一项系统综述。","authors":"Elizabeth Choong, Phoebe Barry, Susan Bewley, Catherine Meads","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2537837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reciprocal IVF (or co-IVF) is increasingly a reproductive option for same-sex female couples. No systematic reviews have compared outcomes of co-IVF using a partner's egg to IVF with own egg. This systematic review determined outcomes of mother and child comparing co-IVF, and IVF with own egg (single, heterosexual, lesbian, trans men), reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases including Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane were searched to November 2024. Inclusion, extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used Revman 5.4 software. Five retrospective cohort studies (3 USA, 2 Spain, 2021-2023) were included (from 625 papers identified, 30 full-text articles examined). Meta-analysis showed higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates for co-IVF compared to IUI, heterosexual IVF, single women, or own-egg lesbian IVF, but lower birthweights. One study reported higher rates of hypertensive disorders (23.8% vs. 12.9%) and gestational diabetes (9.5% vs. 1.6%) in co-IVF. None reported on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, child development and other mother and child outcomes. Larger scale and more diverse studies are needed urgently to assess safety, establish guidelines, and inform couples considering co-IVF.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Outcomes of In-Vitro Fertilization in Same-Sex Female Couples Using Their Partner's Egg Versus Their Own Egg: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Choong, Phoebe Barry, Susan Bewley, Catherine Meads\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2537837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Reciprocal IVF (or co-IVF) is increasingly a reproductive option for same-sex female couples. No systematic reviews have compared outcomes of co-IVF using a partner's egg to IVF with own egg. This systematic review determined outcomes of mother and child comparing co-IVF, and IVF with own egg (single, heterosexual, lesbian, trans men), reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases including Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane were searched to November 2024. Inclusion, extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used Revman 5.4 software. Five retrospective cohort studies (3 USA, 2 Spain, 2021-2023) were included (from 625 papers identified, 30 full-text articles examined). Meta-analysis showed higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates for co-IVF compared to IUI, heterosexual IVF, single women, or own-egg lesbian IVF, but lower birthweights. One study reported higher rates of hypertensive disorders (23.8% vs. 12.9%) and gestational diabetes (9.5% vs. 1.6%) in co-IVF. None reported on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, child development and other mother and child outcomes. Larger scale and more diverse studies are needed urgently to assess safety, establish guidelines, and inform couples considering co-IVF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2537837\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2537837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

互惠体外受精(或共同体外受精)越来越多地成为同性女性伴侣的生育选择。没有系统的评价比较使用伴侣的卵子和使用自己的卵子进行体外受精的结果。本系统评价采用系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,确定了比较联合体外受精和单独卵子体外受精(单身、异性恋、女同性恋、跨性别男性)的母婴结果。检索Embase、Medline、PsycInfo、Scopus、Cochrane等数据库至2024年11月。纳入、提取和质量评估由两名审稿人进行。meta分析采用Revman 5.4软件。纳入了5项回顾性队列研究(3项美国研究,2项西班牙研究,2021-2023年)(从625篇论文中确定,30篇全文文章被检查)。荟萃分析显示,与IUI、异性体外受精、单身女性或同卵女同性恋体外受精相比,联合体外受精的临床妊娠率和活产率更高,但出生体重更低。一项研究报告了联合体外受精中高血压疾病(23.8%对12.9%)和妊娠糖尿病(9.5%对1.6%)的发生率更高。没有关于卵巢过度刺激综合征、儿童发育和其他母婴结局的报道。迫切需要更大规模和更多样化的研究来评估安全性,建立指南,并告知考虑联合体外受精的夫妇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Outcomes of In-Vitro Fertilization in Same-Sex Female Couples Using Their Partner's Egg Versus Their Own Egg: A Systematic Review.

Reciprocal IVF (or co-IVF) is increasingly a reproductive option for same-sex female couples. No systematic reviews have compared outcomes of co-IVF using a partner's egg to IVF with own egg. This systematic review determined outcomes of mother and child comparing co-IVF, and IVF with own egg (single, heterosexual, lesbian, trans men), reported using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases including Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus, Cochrane were searched to November 2024. Inclusion, extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two reviewers. Meta-analyses used Revman 5.4 software. Five retrospective cohort studies (3 USA, 2 Spain, 2021-2023) were included (from 625 papers identified, 30 full-text articles examined). Meta-analysis showed higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates for co-IVF compared to IUI, heterosexual IVF, single women, or own-egg lesbian IVF, but lower birthweights. One study reported higher rates of hypertensive disorders (23.8% vs. 12.9%) and gestational diabetes (9.5% vs. 1.6%) in co-IVF. None reported on ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, child development and other mother and child outcomes. Larger scale and more diverse studies are needed urgently to assess safety, establish guidelines, and inform couples considering co-IVF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信