Leah Talbert, Whitney Allen, Anna Wheeler, Bethany Hartwell, Tanner Jensen, Eliza Young, Thomas Baldwin, Kevin Olpin, Scott Baldwin, Ramona Hopkins, Patrick Steffen, Julian Thayer, Michael Larson
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后心率变异性生物反馈的随机假对照试验。","authors":"Leah Talbert, Whitney Allen, Anna Wheeler, Bethany Hartwell, Tanner Jensen, Eliza Young, Thomas Baldwin, Kevin Olpin, Scott Baldwin, Ramona Hopkins, Patrick Steffen, Julian Thayer, Michael Larson","doi":"10.1007/s10484-025-09734-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation and reduced heart rate variability (HRV), potentially affecting cognition. This study tested whether HRV biofeedback (HRV-B) improved resting HRV and stress recovery in individuals with TBI compared to sham control. We also examined whether HRV changes related to physical symptoms, emotional well-being, cognitive performance, and adherence. Fifty-eight participants with TBI enrolled; 49 completed the study (HRV-B: 25, mean age 27.1; sham: 24, mean age 26.6). Participants attended five weekly sessions. Assessments included cognitive, emotional, and physical outcomes. HRV metrics (HF, LF, LF/HF, SDNN, RMSSD) were collected via electrocardiogram. The HRV-B group showed a higher LF/HF ratio at rest (F(1, 43) = 9.38, p = 0.004) and during stress recovery (F(1, 172) = 4.27, p = 0.040) than sham. A group-by-session interaction (F(1, 172) = 4.18, p = 0.04) indicated an LF/HF increase over time for HRV-B. Condition effects for HF (log), RMSSD, and SDNN at rest favored sham but disappeared after adjusting for pre-assessment values. LF (log) showed no significant effects. Both groups improved in Fluid Cognition and Total Composite scores, with no between-group differences. Anxiety and depression decreased over sessions, with greater depression improvement in HRV-B. No group effects emerged for stress or life satisfaction. HRV-B increased LF/HF ratio at rest and during stressor recovery, possibly reflecting baroreflex engagement. However, other HRV condition effects attenuated after adjusting for baseline values. Cognitive and emotional gains were observed in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":47506,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Following Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).\",\"authors\":\"Leah Talbert, Whitney Allen, Anna Wheeler, Bethany Hartwell, Tanner Jensen, Eliza Young, Thomas Baldwin, Kevin Olpin, Scott Baldwin, Ramona Hopkins, Patrick Steffen, Julian Thayer, Michael Larson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10484-025-09734-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation and reduced heart rate variability (HRV), potentially affecting cognition. This study tested whether HRV biofeedback (HRV-B) improved resting HRV and stress recovery in individuals with TBI compared to sham control. We also examined whether HRV changes related to physical symptoms, emotional well-being, cognitive performance, and adherence. Fifty-eight participants with TBI enrolled; 49 completed the study (HRV-B: 25, mean age 27.1; sham: 24, mean age 26.6). Participants attended five weekly sessions. Assessments included cognitive, emotional, and physical outcomes. HRV metrics (HF, LF, LF/HF, SDNN, RMSSD) were collected via electrocardiogram. The HRV-B group showed a higher LF/HF ratio at rest (F(1, 43) = 9.38, p = 0.004) and during stress recovery (F(1, 172) = 4.27, p = 0.040) than sham. A group-by-session interaction (F(1, 172) = 4.18, p = 0.04) indicated an LF/HF increase over time for HRV-B. Condition effects for HF (log), RMSSD, and SDNN at rest favored sham but disappeared after adjusting for pre-assessment values. LF (log) showed no significant effects. Both groups improved in Fluid Cognition and Total Composite scores, with no between-group differences. Anxiety and depression decreased over sessions, with greater depression improvement in HRV-B. No group effects emerged for stress or life satisfaction. HRV-B increased LF/HF ratio at rest and during stressor recovery, possibly reflecting baroreflex engagement. However, other HRV condition effects attenuated after adjusting for baseline values. Cognitive and emotional gains were observed in both groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09734-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-025-09734-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
外伤性脑损伤(TBI)通常与自主神经系统(ANS)失调和心率变异性(HRV)降低有关,可能影响认知。这项研究测试了HRV生物反馈(HRV- b)是否能改善TBI患者的静息HRV和应激恢复。我们还研究了HRV的变化是否与身体症状、情绪健康、认知表现和依从性有关。58名TBI患者入组;49人完成了研究(HRV-B: 25人,平均年龄27.1岁;假手术:24人,平均年龄26.6岁)。参与者每周参加五次会议。评估包括认知、情感和身体结果。通过心电图收集HRV指标(HF、LF、LF/HF、SDNN、RMSSD)。HRV-B组静息时(F(1,43) = 9.38, p = 0.004)和应激恢复时(F(1,172) = 4.27, p = 0.040)的LF/HF比值高于假手术组。分组间的相互作用(F(1,172) = 4.18, p = 0.04)表明,随着时间的推移,HRV-B的LF/HF升高。静息状态下HF (log)、RMSSD和SDNN的条件效应有利于假手术,但在调整预评估值后消失。LF (log)无显著影响。两组在流体认知和总综合评分方面均有改善,组间无差异。焦虑和抑郁在治疗过程中减少,HRV-B的抑郁改善更大。在压力或生活满意度方面没有出现群体效应。HRV-B在休息和应激恢复期间增加了LF/HF比率,可能反映了气压反射作用。然而,其他HRV条件的影响在调整基线值后减弱。两组患者的认知和情绪都有所改善。
A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Following Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI).
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often associated with autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation and reduced heart rate variability (HRV), potentially affecting cognition. This study tested whether HRV biofeedback (HRV-B) improved resting HRV and stress recovery in individuals with TBI compared to sham control. We also examined whether HRV changes related to physical symptoms, emotional well-being, cognitive performance, and adherence. Fifty-eight participants with TBI enrolled; 49 completed the study (HRV-B: 25, mean age 27.1; sham: 24, mean age 26.6). Participants attended five weekly sessions. Assessments included cognitive, emotional, and physical outcomes. HRV metrics (HF, LF, LF/HF, SDNN, RMSSD) were collected via electrocardiogram. The HRV-B group showed a higher LF/HF ratio at rest (F(1, 43) = 9.38, p = 0.004) and during stress recovery (F(1, 172) = 4.27, p = 0.040) than sham. A group-by-session interaction (F(1, 172) = 4.18, p = 0.04) indicated an LF/HF increase over time for HRV-B. Condition effects for HF (log), RMSSD, and SDNN at rest favored sham but disappeared after adjusting for pre-assessment values. LF (log) showed no significant effects. Both groups improved in Fluid Cognition and Total Composite scores, with no between-group differences. Anxiety and depression decreased over sessions, with greater depression improvement in HRV-B. No group effects emerged for stress or life satisfaction. HRV-B increased LF/HF ratio at rest and during stressor recovery, possibly reflecting baroreflex engagement. However, other HRV condition effects attenuated after adjusting for baseline values. Cognitive and emotional gains were observed in both groups.
期刊介绍:
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is an international, interdisciplinary journal devoted to study of the interrelationship of physiological systems, cognition, social and environmental parameters, and health. Priority is given to original research, basic and applied, which contributes to the theory, practice, and evaluation of applied psychophysiology and biofeedback. Submissions are also welcomed for consideration in several additional sections that appear in the journal. They consist of conceptual and theoretical articles; evaluative reviews; the Clinical Forum, which includes separate categories for innovative case studies, clinical replication series, extended treatment protocols, and clinical notes and observations; the Discussion Forum, which includes a series of papers centered around a topic of importance to the field; Innovations in Instrumentation; Letters to the Editor, commenting on issues raised in articles previously published in the journal; and select book reviews. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback is the official publication of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.