患者和一级亲属对炎症性肠病的预测和预防的看法——一项跨国调查。

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
United European Gastroenterology Journal Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-19 DOI:10.1002/ueg2.70091
Ana Catarina Bravo, Sara Godt Christensen, Mette Julsgaard, Iago Rodriguez-Lago, Lucía Exposito, Daniel Ginard, Pascal Juillerat, Heidi Gram Sørensen, Gionata Fiorino, Anthony Buisson, Nickolas Stemmer, Natalia Queiroz, Adriana Ribas, Vivíana Parra Izquierdo, Corey A Siegel, Kenneth Croitoiru, Elizabeth A Spencer, Inga Peter, Alan Moss, Luisa Avedano, Salvo Leone, Jean-Frederic Colombel, Manasi Agrawal, Ryan Ungaro, Catarina Fidalgo, Bárbara Morão, Joana Torres
{"title":"患者和一级亲属对炎症性肠病的预测和预防的看法——一项跨国调查。","authors":"Ana Catarina Bravo, Sara Godt Christensen, Mette Julsgaard, Iago Rodriguez-Lago, Lucía Exposito, Daniel Ginard, Pascal Juillerat, Heidi Gram Sørensen, Gionata Fiorino, Anthony Buisson, Nickolas Stemmer, Natalia Queiroz, Adriana Ribas, Vivíana Parra Izquierdo, Corey A Siegel, Kenneth Croitoiru, Elizabeth A Spencer, Inga Peter, Alan Moss, Luisa Avedano, Salvo Leone, Jean-Frederic Colombel, Manasi Agrawal, Ryan Ungaro, Catarina Fidalgo, Bárbara Morão, Joana Torres","doi":"10.1002/ueg2.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>While significant advances have been made in identifying biomarkers for predicting inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) onset, little is known about the willingness of at-risk individuals to undergo predictive testing and preventive interventions. This study aimed to assess acceptance of predictive tests and preventive interventions among individuals at risk of inflammatory bowel disease and identify factors influencing their decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymized electronic survey was distributed to parents of children at risk of inflammatory bowel disease and first-degree relatives (FDRs) of IBD patients via clinicians and patient associations. The survey assessed acceptance of predictive tests, preventive interventions, and influencing variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1327 participants (74% women, mean age 42 ± 18 years) from 66 countries responded to the survey. Of these, 88% were parents of children at risk, and 12% were FDRs. Eighty-five percent were willing to embark in predictive testing, preferring blood analysis (91%), stool tests (89%), saliva tests (78%) or intestinal ultrasound (67%). Lower perceived IBD impact and higher disease knowledge reduced the odds of test acceptance. Preventive interventions were accepted by 98%, with dietary changes (85%), physical exercise (81%), and probiotics (71%) being the preferred. Acceptance of oral (38%) or intravenous/subcutaneous immunosuppressive treatments (32%) depended on their efficacy, difficulty, and risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most respondents preferred minimally invasive predictive tests and non-pharmacological preventive measures, although more than one-third would be willing to undergo immunosuppressive medications to prevent disease onset. Disease knowledge and quality-of-life perceptions influenced preferences. This data provides important information for the development of IBD prediction and prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23444,"journal":{"name":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1226-1238"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and First-Degree Relatives Perceptions About Prediction and Prevention of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Multinational Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Catarina Bravo, Sara Godt Christensen, Mette Julsgaard, Iago Rodriguez-Lago, Lucía Exposito, Daniel Ginard, Pascal Juillerat, Heidi Gram Sørensen, Gionata Fiorino, Anthony Buisson, Nickolas Stemmer, Natalia Queiroz, Adriana Ribas, Vivíana Parra Izquierdo, Corey A Siegel, Kenneth Croitoiru, Elizabeth A Spencer, Inga Peter, Alan Moss, Luisa Avedano, Salvo Leone, Jean-Frederic Colombel, Manasi Agrawal, Ryan Ungaro, Catarina Fidalgo, Bárbara Morão, Joana Torres\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ueg2.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>While significant advances have been made in identifying biomarkers for predicting inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) onset, little is known about the willingness of at-risk individuals to undergo predictive testing and preventive interventions. This study aimed to assess acceptance of predictive tests and preventive interventions among individuals at risk of inflammatory bowel disease and identify factors influencing their decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymized electronic survey was distributed to parents of children at risk of inflammatory bowel disease and first-degree relatives (FDRs) of IBD patients via clinicians and patient associations. The survey assessed acceptance of predictive tests, preventive interventions, and influencing variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1327 participants (74% women, mean age 42 ± 18 years) from 66 countries responded to the survey. Of these, 88% were parents of children at risk, and 12% were FDRs. Eighty-five percent were willing to embark in predictive testing, preferring blood analysis (91%), stool tests (89%), saliva tests (78%) or intestinal ultrasound (67%). Lower perceived IBD impact and higher disease knowledge reduced the odds of test acceptance. Preventive interventions were accepted by 98%, with dietary changes (85%), physical exercise (81%), and probiotics (71%) being the preferred. Acceptance of oral (38%) or intravenous/subcutaneous immunosuppressive treatments (32%) depended on their efficacy, difficulty, and risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most respondents preferred minimally invasive predictive tests and non-pharmacological preventive measures, although more than one-third would be willing to undergo immunosuppressive medications to prevent disease onset. Disease knowledge and quality-of-life perceptions influenced preferences. This data provides important information for the development of IBD prediction and prevention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1226-1238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12463702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"United European Gastroenterology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"United European Gastroenterology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.70091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:虽然在识别预测炎症性肠病(IBD)发病的生物标志物方面取得了重大进展,但人们对高危个体接受预测性检测和预防性干预的意愿知之甚少。本研究旨在评估具有炎症性肠病风险的个体对预测性检查和预防性干预的接受程度,并确定影响其决定的因素。方法:通过临床医生和患者协会向炎症性肠病危险儿童的父母和IBD患者的一级亲属(fdr)分发匿名电子调查。该调查评估了预测测试、预防性干预措施和影响变量的接受程度。结果:共有来自66个国家的1327名参与者(74%为女性,平均年龄42±18岁)参与了调查。在这些人中,88%是有风险孩子的父母,12%是fdr。85%的人愿意进行预测性测试,更喜欢血液分析(91%)、粪便测试(89%)、唾液测试(78%)或肠道超声(67%)。较低的认知IBD影响和较高的疾病知识降低了测试接受的几率。98%的人接受预防性干预措施,其中饮食改变(85%)、体育锻炼(81%)和益生菌(71%)是首选。接受口服(38%)或静脉/皮下免疫抑制治疗(32%)取决于其疗效、难度和风险。结论:尽管超过三分之一的受访者愿意接受免疫抑制药物来预防疾病发作,但大多数受访者更喜欢微创预测试验和非药物预防措施。疾病知识和对生活质量的认知影响了偏好。这些数据为IBD预测和预防策略的发展提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and First-Degree Relatives Perceptions About Prediction and Prevention of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Multinational Survey.

Background and objective: While significant advances have been made in identifying biomarkers for predicting inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) onset, little is known about the willingness of at-risk individuals to undergo predictive testing and preventive interventions. This study aimed to assess acceptance of predictive tests and preventive interventions among individuals at risk of inflammatory bowel disease and identify factors influencing their decisions.

Methods: An anonymized electronic survey was distributed to parents of children at risk of inflammatory bowel disease and first-degree relatives (FDRs) of IBD patients via clinicians and patient associations. The survey assessed acceptance of predictive tests, preventive interventions, and influencing variables.

Results: A total of 1327 participants (74% women, mean age 42 ± 18 years) from 66 countries responded to the survey. Of these, 88% were parents of children at risk, and 12% were FDRs. Eighty-five percent were willing to embark in predictive testing, preferring blood analysis (91%), stool tests (89%), saliva tests (78%) or intestinal ultrasound (67%). Lower perceived IBD impact and higher disease knowledge reduced the odds of test acceptance. Preventive interventions were accepted by 98%, with dietary changes (85%), physical exercise (81%), and probiotics (71%) being the preferred. Acceptance of oral (38%) or intravenous/subcutaneous immunosuppressive treatments (32%) depended on their efficacy, difficulty, and risks.

Conclusion: Most respondents preferred minimally invasive predictive tests and non-pharmacological preventive measures, although more than one-third would be willing to undergo immunosuppressive medications to prevent disease onset. Disease knowledge and quality-of-life perceptions influenced preferences. This data provides important information for the development of IBD prediction and prevention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
United European Gastroenterology Journal
United European Gastroenterology Journal GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
147
期刊介绍: United European Gastroenterology Journal (UEG Journal) is the official Journal of the United European Gastroenterology (UEG), a professional non-profit organisation combining all the leading European societies concerned with digestive disease. UEG’s member societies represent over 22,000 specialists working across medicine, surgery, paediatrics, GI oncology and endoscopy, which makes UEG a unique platform for collaboration and the exchange of knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信