Hayley S Mountford, Else Eising, Pierre Fontanillas, Adam Auton, Evan K Irving-Pease, Catherine Doust, Timothy C Bates, Nicholas G Martin, Simon E Fisher, Michelle Luciano
{"title":"阅读障碍和定量阅读能力的多变量全基因组关联分析有助于基因发现。","authors":"Hayley S Mountford, Else Eising, Pierre Fontanillas, Adam Auton, Evan K Irving-Pease, Catherine Doust, Timothy C Bates, Nicholas G Martin, Simon E Fisher, Michelle Luciano","doi":"10.1038/s41398-025-03514-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to read is an important life skill and a major route to education. Dyslexia, characterized by difficulties with accurate/ fluent word reading, and poor spelling is influenced by genetic variation, with a twin study heritability estimate of 0.4-0.6. Until recently, genomic investigations were limited by modest sample size. We used a multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) method, MTAG, to leverage summary statistics from two independent GWAS efforts, boosting power for analyses of dyslexia; the GenLang meta-analysis of word reading (N = 27,180) and the 23andMe, Inc., study of dyslexia (N<sub>cases</sub> = 51,800, N<sub>controls</sub> = 1,087,070). We increased the effective sample size to 1,228,832 participants, representing the largest genetic study of reading-related phenotypes to date. Our analyses identified 80 independent genome-wide significant loci, including 36 regions which were not previously reported as significant. Of these 36 loci, 13 were novel regions with no prior association with dyslexia. We observed clear genetic correlations with cognitive and educational measures. Gene-set analyses revealed significant enrichment of dyslexia-associated genes in four neuronal biological process pathways, and findings were further supported by enrichment of neuronally expressed genes in the developing embryonic brain. Polygenic index analysis of our multivariate results predicted between 2.34-4.73% of variance in reading traits in an independent sample, the National Child Development Study cohort (N = 6410). Polygenic adaptation was examined using a large panel of ancient genomes spanning the last ~15 k years. We did not find evidence of selection, suggesting that dyslexia has not been subject to recent selection pressure in Europeans. By combining existing datasets to improve statistical power, these results provide novel insights into the biology of dyslexia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"15 1","pages":"289"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariate genome-wide association analysis of dyslexia and quantitative reading skill improves gene discovery.\",\"authors\":\"Hayley S Mountford, Else Eising, Pierre Fontanillas, Adam Auton, Evan K Irving-Pease, Catherine Doust, Timothy C Bates, Nicholas G Martin, Simon E Fisher, Michelle Luciano\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41398-025-03514-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability to read is an important life skill and a major route to education. Dyslexia, characterized by difficulties with accurate/ fluent word reading, and poor spelling is influenced by genetic variation, with a twin study heritability estimate of 0.4-0.6. Until recently, genomic investigations were limited by modest sample size. We used a multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) method, MTAG, to leverage summary statistics from two independent GWAS efforts, boosting power for analyses of dyslexia; the GenLang meta-analysis of word reading (N = 27,180) and the 23andMe, Inc., study of dyslexia (N<sub>cases</sub> = 51,800, N<sub>controls</sub> = 1,087,070). We increased the effective sample size to 1,228,832 participants, representing the largest genetic study of reading-related phenotypes to date. Our analyses identified 80 independent genome-wide significant loci, including 36 regions which were not previously reported as significant. Of these 36 loci, 13 were novel regions with no prior association with dyslexia. We observed clear genetic correlations with cognitive and educational measures. Gene-set analyses revealed significant enrichment of dyslexia-associated genes in four neuronal biological process pathways, and findings were further supported by enrichment of neuronally expressed genes in the developing embryonic brain. Polygenic index analysis of our multivariate results predicted between 2.34-4.73% of variance in reading traits in an independent sample, the National Child Development Study cohort (N = 6410). Polygenic adaptation was examined using a large panel of ancient genomes spanning the last ~15 k years. We did not find evidence of selection, suggesting that dyslexia has not been subject to recent selection pressure in Europeans. By combining existing datasets to improve statistical power, these results provide novel insights into the biology of dyslexia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"289\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03514-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-025-03514-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multivariate genome-wide association analysis of dyslexia and quantitative reading skill improves gene discovery.
The ability to read is an important life skill and a major route to education. Dyslexia, characterized by difficulties with accurate/ fluent word reading, and poor spelling is influenced by genetic variation, with a twin study heritability estimate of 0.4-0.6. Until recently, genomic investigations were limited by modest sample size. We used a multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) method, MTAG, to leverage summary statistics from two independent GWAS efforts, boosting power for analyses of dyslexia; the GenLang meta-analysis of word reading (N = 27,180) and the 23andMe, Inc., study of dyslexia (Ncases = 51,800, Ncontrols = 1,087,070). We increased the effective sample size to 1,228,832 participants, representing the largest genetic study of reading-related phenotypes to date. Our analyses identified 80 independent genome-wide significant loci, including 36 regions which were not previously reported as significant. Of these 36 loci, 13 were novel regions with no prior association with dyslexia. We observed clear genetic correlations with cognitive and educational measures. Gene-set analyses revealed significant enrichment of dyslexia-associated genes in four neuronal biological process pathways, and findings were further supported by enrichment of neuronally expressed genes in the developing embryonic brain. Polygenic index analysis of our multivariate results predicted between 2.34-4.73% of variance in reading traits in an independent sample, the National Child Development Study cohort (N = 6410). Polygenic adaptation was examined using a large panel of ancient genomes spanning the last ~15 k years. We did not find evidence of selection, suggesting that dyslexia has not been subject to recent selection pressure in Europeans. By combining existing datasets to improve statistical power, these results provide novel insights into the biology of dyslexia.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.