科罗拉多州牛肉生产商对牛肉质量保证计划的看法的调查。

IF 1.8 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Translational Animal Science Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/tas/txaf057
Malei Tipton, Colton Smith, Paxton Sullivan, Tyler Thomas, Libby Bigler, Kayleigh Keller, Jason Ahola, Lily Edwards-Callaway
{"title":"科罗拉多州牛肉生产商对牛肉质量保证计划的看法的调查。","authors":"Malei Tipton, Colton Smith, Paxton Sullivan, Tyler Thomas, Libby Bigler, Kayleigh Keller, Jason Ahola, Lily Edwards-Callaway","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program was first established as a voluntary beef producer initiative to address food safety and quality challenges. A statewide survey of beef producers was conducted to determine: (1) prevalence of BQA certification status, (2) the relationship between BQA certification and adherence to best management practices, and (3) perceptions about the value of BQA certification. The survey was mailed to beef producers in Colorado and included questions about demographics, BQA knowledge and participation, perspectives on the BQA program, and value derived from BQA. A total of 466 producers were included in the analysis; nearly 95% (n = 439) had heard of the BQA program, and 72.0% (n = 313) had participated in BQA training. There was a significant relationship between BQA certification status and: perceived knowledge about and adherence to BQA guidelines (χ<sup>2</sup> = 171.82, P < 0.0001), indication of having written documentation of a valid working relationship with a veterinarian (χ<sup>2</sup> = 20.246, P < 0.0001), and following of animal handling and well-being practices (χ<sup>2</sup> = 68.558, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). There was a relationship between being BQA-certification and using BQA certification as a marketing strategy (χ<sup>2</sup> = 93.001, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Results showed a relationship between BQA certification status and the belief that BQA certification increases consumer confidence in beef production (χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.886, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Results from this study indicate that producers identify many values associated with the BQA program related to cattle well-being, profitability, and consumer confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf057"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of Colorado beef producers' perceptions of the Beef Quality Assurance program.\",\"authors\":\"Malei Tipton, Colton Smith, Paxton Sullivan, Tyler Thomas, Libby Bigler, Kayleigh Keller, Jason Ahola, Lily Edwards-Callaway\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txaf057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program was first established as a voluntary beef producer initiative to address food safety and quality challenges. A statewide survey of beef producers was conducted to determine: (1) prevalence of BQA certification status, (2) the relationship between BQA certification and adherence to best management practices, and (3) perceptions about the value of BQA certification. The survey was mailed to beef producers in Colorado and included questions about demographics, BQA knowledge and participation, perspectives on the BQA program, and value derived from BQA. A total of 466 producers were included in the analysis; nearly 95% (n = 439) had heard of the BQA program, and 72.0% (n = 313) had participated in BQA training. There was a significant relationship between BQA certification status and: perceived knowledge about and adherence to BQA guidelines (χ<sup>2</sup> = 171.82, P < 0.0001), indication of having written documentation of a valid working relationship with a veterinarian (χ<sup>2</sup> = 20.246, P < 0.0001), and following of animal handling and well-being practices (χ<sup>2</sup> = 68.558, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). There was a relationship between being BQA-certification and using BQA certification as a marketing strategy (χ<sup>2</sup> = 93.001, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Results showed a relationship between BQA certification status and the belief that BQA certification increases consumer confidence in beef production (χ<sup>2</sup> = 18.886, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Results from this study indicate that producers identify many values associated with the BQA program related to cattle well-being, profitability, and consumer confidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"txaf057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

牛肉质量保证(BQA)计划最初是作为牛肉生产商自愿倡议建立的,旨在应对食品安全和质量挑战。在全州范围内对牛肉生产商进行了调查,以确定:(1)BQA认证状态的流行程度,(2)BQA认证与遵守最佳管理规范之间的关系,以及(3)对BQA认证价值的看法。该调查邮寄给科罗拉多州的牛肉生产商,问题包括人口统计、BQA知识和参与情况、对BQA项目的看法以及从BQA获得的价值。共有466家生产商被纳入分析;近95% (n = 439)的人听说过BQA项目,72.0% (n = 313)的人参加过BQA培训。BQA认证状态与BQA指南认知知识和遵守程度有显著相关(χ2 = 171.82, P 2 = 20.246, P 2 = 68.558, P 2 = 93.001, P 2 = 18.886, P 2 = 18.886)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey of Colorado beef producers' perceptions of the Beef Quality Assurance program.

The Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) program was first established as a voluntary beef producer initiative to address food safety and quality challenges. A statewide survey of beef producers was conducted to determine: (1) prevalence of BQA certification status, (2) the relationship between BQA certification and adherence to best management practices, and (3) perceptions about the value of BQA certification. The survey was mailed to beef producers in Colorado and included questions about demographics, BQA knowledge and participation, perspectives on the BQA program, and value derived from BQA. A total of 466 producers were included in the analysis; nearly 95% (n = 439) had heard of the BQA program, and 72.0% (n = 313) had participated in BQA training. There was a significant relationship between BQA certification status and: perceived knowledge about and adherence to BQA guidelines (χ2 = 171.82, P < 0.0001), indication of having written documentation of a valid working relationship with a veterinarian (χ2 = 20.246, P < 0.0001), and following of animal handling and well-being practices (χ2 = 68.558, P < 0.0001). There was a relationship between being BQA-certification and using BQA certification as a marketing strategy (χ2 = 93.001, P < 0.0001). Results showed a relationship between BQA certification status and the belief that BQA certification increases consumer confidence in beef production (χ2 = 18.886, P < 0.0001). Results from this study indicate that producers identify many values associated with the BQA program related to cattle well-being, profitability, and consumer confidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Animal Science
Translational Animal Science Veterinary-Veterinary (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
149
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信