Nicolas Caram, Emanuel Duvalsaint, Diwakar Vyas, Marcelo Wallau
{"title":"评价橙油和胡枝子干草作为山羊替代驱虫剂的效果。","authors":"Nicolas Caram, Emanuel Duvalsaint, Diwakar Vyas, Marcelo Wallau","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identifying alternative practices to control gastrointestinal parasites and overcome resistance to chemical anthelmintics is critical to maintain the productive and economic viability of the small ruminant sector. Here, we evaluated in vivo potential effects of orange oil and sericea lespedeza (<i>Lespedeza cuneata</i> [Dumont] G. Don) supplementation on suppressing gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and improving performance of goats. Twenty-four bucks were used in a randomized complete block design and were assigned to12 pens after deworming. Experimental duration was 6 wk (1 wk adaptation and 5 wk of data collection) and treatments were arranged in a factorial combination of two levels of orange oil, at 0 or 600 mg/kg BW, and lespedeza hay, at 0% or 9% of the diet DM, in three replicates. Response variables included dry matter intake (DMI), growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal egg counts (FEC), and blood parameters. The inclusion of orange oil and/or lespedeza decreased DM (-12.6%) and neutral detergent fiber digestibility (-14.3%) but did not decrease DMI (1.06 kg DM/goat/day) or growth performance (78.3 g/animal/day). Orange oil administration decreased 46% of Trichostrongyle FEC, but no effects were observed on strongyloide and coccidia FECs. Orange oil also increased neutrophil concentration, potentially indicating an inflammatory response. Although orange oil showed promise as a natural alternative to synthetic dewormers for controlling GIN in goats, its efficacy is variable and may be influenced by dosage, formulation, and treatment duration. However, lespedeza hay, despite its known antiparasitic effects, was ineffective in reducing FEC when included at levels in this experiment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf083"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating orange oil and lespedeza hay as an alternative anthelmintic for goats.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Caram, Emanuel Duvalsaint, Diwakar Vyas, Marcelo Wallau\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tas/txaf083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Identifying alternative practices to control gastrointestinal parasites and overcome resistance to chemical anthelmintics is critical to maintain the productive and economic viability of the small ruminant sector. Here, we evaluated in vivo potential effects of orange oil and sericea lespedeza (<i>Lespedeza cuneata</i> [Dumont] G. Don) supplementation on suppressing gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and improving performance of goats. Twenty-four bucks were used in a randomized complete block design and were assigned to12 pens after deworming. Experimental duration was 6 wk (1 wk adaptation and 5 wk of data collection) and treatments were arranged in a factorial combination of two levels of orange oil, at 0 or 600 mg/kg BW, and lespedeza hay, at 0% or 9% of the diet DM, in three replicates. Response variables included dry matter intake (DMI), growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal egg counts (FEC), and blood parameters. The inclusion of orange oil and/or lespedeza decreased DM (-12.6%) and neutral detergent fiber digestibility (-14.3%) but did not decrease DMI (1.06 kg DM/goat/day) or growth performance (78.3 g/animal/day). Orange oil administration decreased 46% of Trichostrongyle FEC, but no effects were observed on strongyloide and coccidia FECs. Orange oil also increased neutrophil concentration, potentially indicating an inflammatory response. Although orange oil showed promise as a natural alternative to synthetic dewormers for controlling GIN in goats, its efficacy is variable and may be influenced by dosage, formulation, and treatment duration. However, lespedeza hay, despite its known antiparasitic effects, was ineffective in reducing FEC when included at levels in this experiment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"txaf083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357239/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
确定控制胃肠道寄生虫和克服对化学驱虫药耐药性的替代做法对于维持小反刍动物部门的生产和经济活力至关重要。在此,我们评估了添加橙油和胡枝子(lespedeza cuneata [Dumont] G. Don)对山羊体内抑制胃肠道线虫(GIN)和提高生产性能的潜在影响。24美元在一个随机的完全块设计中被使用,在驱虫后被分配到12个笔中。试验期为6周(1周适应期和5周数据收集期),处理按2个水平(0或600 mg/kg BW)和胡枝子干草(0%或9%日粮DM)的因子组合,分3个重复。响应变量包括干物质采食量(DMI)、生长性能、营养物质消化率、粪蛋数(FEC)和血液参数。添加橙油和/或胡枝子可降低DM(-12.6%)和中性洗涤纤维消化率(-14.3%),但未降低DMI (1.06 kg DM/羊/天)和生长性能(78.3 g/羊/天)。橙油降低了46%的圆线虫FEC,但对圆线虫和球虫FEC没有影响。橙油还会增加中性粒细胞浓度,这可能表明存在炎症反应。虽然橙油作为合成驱虫剂的天然替代品有望控制山羊的GIN,但其效果是可变的,可能受到剂量、配方和治疗时间的影响。然而,尽管胡枝子干草具有已知的抗寄生虫作用,但在本实验中加入一定水平时,其对降低FEC无效。
Evaluating orange oil and lespedeza hay as an alternative anthelmintic for goats.
Identifying alternative practices to control gastrointestinal parasites and overcome resistance to chemical anthelmintics is critical to maintain the productive and economic viability of the small ruminant sector. Here, we evaluated in vivo potential effects of orange oil and sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata [Dumont] G. Don) supplementation on suppressing gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) and improving performance of goats. Twenty-four bucks were used in a randomized complete block design and were assigned to12 pens after deworming. Experimental duration was 6 wk (1 wk adaptation and 5 wk of data collection) and treatments were arranged in a factorial combination of two levels of orange oil, at 0 or 600 mg/kg BW, and lespedeza hay, at 0% or 9% of the diet DM, in three replicates. Response variables included dry matter intake (DMI), growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal egg counts (FEC), and blood parameters. The inclusion of orange oil and/or lespedeza decreased DM (-12.6%) and neutral detergent fiber digestibility (-14.3%) but did not decrease DMI (1.06 kg DM/goat/day) or growth performance (78.3 g/animal/day). Orange oil administration decreased 46% of Trichostrongyle FEC, but no effects were observed on strongyloide and coccidia FECs. Orange oil also increased neutrophil concentration, potentially indicating an inflammatory response. Although orange oil showed promise as a natural alternative to synthetic dewormers for controlling GIN in goats, its efficacy is variable and may be influenced by dosage, formulation, and treatment duration. However, lespedeza hay, despite its known antiparasitic effects, was ineffective in reducing FEC when included at levels in this experiment.
期刊介绍:
Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.