Joachim Baech, Lærke Andersen, Stine Linding Andersen
{"title":"常规医院化验室的极端生化病人结果。","authors":"Joachim Baech, Lærke Andersen, Stine Linding Andersen","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2546326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biochemical tests are crucial in acute patient care, and the validity of the results is important. We aimed to evaluate extreme results reported in a routine hospital laboratory and to review patient characteristics. This is a retrospective cohort study of extreme laboratory results reported at the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (2022-2024). For six common analytes (sodium, potassium, creatinine, calcium, phosphate, and magnesium), the most extreme low (<i>n</i> = 25) and high (<i>n</i> = 25) results were identified. Electronic health records of 284 unique patients were reviewed to determine pathophysiological causes, pre-analytical errors, clinical course, and 7-day survival. Among 5,794,014 biochemical test results, 300 extreme results (0.005%) were identified, with 261 (87.0%) being compatible with a pathophysiological cause, and 39 (13.0%) being caused by a pre-analytical error. For high results, renal failure was the predominant cause (54.1%), particularly affecting creatinine, phosphate, and potassium. For low results, low creatinine was caused by muscle atrophy, while for other analytes, the most common causes were malnutrition, alcoholism, sepsis, diarrhea/emesis, and diuretics. The 7-day survival was lower for patients with extremely high results (77.4%) compared to low (94.5%). In conclusion, in a routine hospital laboratory, extreme biochemical test results were often pathophysiological, with pre-analytical errors accounting for around 10% of the reported results. Survival was generally high and patients with extremely low results had higher survival compared to those with extremely high results. Results inform the laboratory's decision-making on the handling and release of extreme biochemical results.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"395-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extreme biochemical patient results in a routine hospital laboratory.\",\"authors\":\"Joachim Baech, Lærke Andersen, Stine Linding Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2025.2546326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biochemical tests are crucial in acute patient care, and the validity of the results is important. We aimed to evaluate extreme results reported in a routine hospital laboratory and to review patient characteristics. This is a retrospective cohort study of extreme laboratory results reported at the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (2022-2024). For six common analytes (sodium, potassium, creatinine, calcium, phosphate, and magnesium), the most extreme low (<i>n</i> = 25) and high (<i>n</i> = 25) results were identified. Electronic health records of 284 unique patients were reviewed to determine pathophysiological causes, pre-analytical errors, clinical course, and 7-day survival. Among 5,794,014 biochemical test results, 300 extreme results (0.005%) were identified, with 261 (87.0%) being compatible with a pathophysiological cause, and 39 (13.0%) being caused by a pre-analytical error. For high results, renal failure was the predominant cause (54.1%), particularly affecting creatinine, phosphate, and potassium. For low results, low creatinine was caused by muscle atrophy, while for other analytes, the most common causes were malnutrition, alcoholism, sepsis, diarrhea/emesis, and diuretics. The 7-day survival was lower for patients with extremely high results (77.4%) compared to low (94.5%). In conclusion, in a routine hospital laboratory, extreme biochemical test results were often pathophysiological, with pre-analytical errors accounting for around 10% of the reported results. Survival was generally high and patients with extremely low results had higher survival compared to those with extremely high results. Results inform the laboratory's decision-making on the handling and release of extreme biochemical results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"395-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2546326\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2546326","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Extreme biochemical patient results in a routine hospital laboratory.
Biochemical tests are crucial in acute patient care, and the validity of the results is important. We aimed to evaluate extreme results reported in a routine hospital laboratory and to review patient characteristics. This is a retrospective cohort study of extreme laboratory results reported at the Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark (2022-2024). For six common analytes (sodium, potassium, creatinine, calcium, phosphate, and magnesium), the most extreme low (n = 25) and high (n = 25) results were identified. Electronic health records of 284 unique patients were reviewed to determine pathophysiological causes, pre-analytical errors, clinical course, and 7-day survival. Among 5,794,014 biochemical test results, 300 extreme results (0.005%) were identified, with 261 (87.0%) being compatible with a pathophysiological cause, and 39 (13.0%) being caused by a pre-analytical error. For high results, renal failure was the predominant cause (54.1%), particularly affecting creatinine, phosphate, and potassium. For low results, low creatinine was caused by muscle atrophy, while for other analytes, the most common causes were malnutrition, alcoholism, sepsis, diarrhea/emesis, and diuretics. The 7-day survival was lower for patients with extremely high results (77.4%) compared to low (94.5%). In conclusion, in a routine hospital laboratory, extreme biochemical test results were often pathophysiological, with pre-analytical errors accounting for around 10% of the reported results. Survival was generally high and patients with extremely low results had higher survival compared to those with extremely high results. Results inform the laboratory's decision-making on the handling and release of extreme biochemical results.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry.
The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.