Aman Goyal, Sonia Hurjkaliani, Kevin Michael Alexander, Jianfeng Xu, Manan Pareek, Arman Qamar
{"title":"多基因风险评分在静脉血栓栓塞中的作用:现状和未来方向。","authors":"Aman Goyal, Sonia Hurjkaliani, Kevin Michael Alexander, Jianfeng Xu, Manan Pareek, Arman Qamar","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant global health concern, with >1 million cases annually in the United States, making it a leading cause of preventable hospital-related deaths. Advances in genetic research, particularly genome-wide association studies, have demonstrated the polygenic nature of VTE by identifying numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with susceptibility. The polygenic risk score (PRS), which aggregates the effects of multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms, has emerged as a valuable tool for improving VTE risk assessment. Recent studies have demonstrated that PRS significantly improves VTE risk prediction beyond traditional clinical factors. Integrating genetic and clinical data enhances predictive accuracy, with individuals at high risk identified by PRS showing nearly 8 times the VTE risk of those at low risk. Additionally, PRS models have been developed to predict VTE risk in various predisposing conditions, including malignancies, cardiometabolic disorders, and pulmonary hypertension. These findings indicate that PRS could inform thromboprophylaxis decisions for high-risk patients. Further evidence indicates that PRS improves VTE risk prediction, even in individuals without conventional risk factors, such as family history or lifestyle contributors. The future of PRS in VTE risk stratification is promising, offering refined risk assessment, optimized anticoagulation management, and tailored thromboprophylaxis. However, challenges persist, including the development of multiancestry PRS models to enhance predictive accuracy across diverse populations. Continued research and validation will be essential to unlocking the full clinical potential of PRS in VTE management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 5","pages":"102973"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"R<b>ole of polygenic risk scores in venous thromboembolism: current state and future direc</b> <b>tions</b>.\",\"authors\":\"Aman Goyal, Sonia Hurjkaliani, Kevin Michael Alexander, Jianfeng Xu, Manan Pareek, Arman Qamar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant global health concern, with >1 million cases annually in the United States, making it a leading cause of preventable hospital-related deaths. Advances in genetic research, particularly genome-wide association studies, have demonstrated the polygenic nature of VTE by identifying numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with susceptibility. The polygenic risk score (PRS), which aggregates the effects of multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms, has emerged as a valuable tool for improving VTE risk assessment. Recent studies have demonstrated that PRS significantly improves VTE risk prediction beyond traditional clinical factors. Integrating genetic and clinical data enhances predictive accuracy, with individuals at high risk identified by PRS showing nearly 8 times the VTE risk of those at low risk. Additionally, PRS models have been developed to predict VTE risk in various predisposing conditions, including malignancies, cardiometabolic disorders, and pulmonary hypertension. These findings indicate that PRS could inform thromboprophylaxis decisions for high-risk patients. Further evidence indicates that PRS improves VTE risk prediction, even in individuals without conventional risk factors, such as family history or lifestyle contributors. The future of PRS in VTE risk stratification is promising, offering refined risk assessment, optimized anticoagulation management, and tailored thromboprophylaxis. However, challenges persist, including the development of multiancestry PRS models to enhance predictive accuracy across diverse populations. Continued research and validation will be essential to unlocking the full clinical potential of PRS in VTE management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"102973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102973\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102973","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role of polygenic risk scores in venous thromboembolism: current state and future directions.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant global health concern, with >1 million cases annually in the United States, making it a leading cause of preventable hospital-related deaths. Advances in genetic research, particularly genome-wide association studies, have demonstrated the polygenic nature of VTE by identifying numerous single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with susceptibility. The polygenic risk score (PRS), which aggregates the effects of multiple single-nucleotide polymorphisms, has emerged as a valuable tool for improving VTE risk assessment. Recent studies have demonstrated that PRS significantly improves VTE risk prediction beyond traditional clinical factors. Integrating genetic and clinical data enhances predictive accuracy, with individuals at high risk identified by PRS showing nearly 8 times the VTE risk of those at low risk. Additionally, PRS models have been developed to predict VTE risk in various predisposing conditions, including malignancies, cardiometabolic disorders, and pulmonary hypertension. These findings indicate that PRS could inform thromboprophylaxis decisions for high-risk patients. Further evidence indicates that PRS improves VTE risk prediction, even in individuals without conventional risk factors, such as family history or lifestyle contributors. The future of PRS in VTE risk stratification is promising, offering refined risk assessment, optimized anticoagulation management, and tailored thromboprophylaxis. However, challenges persist, including the development of multiancestry PRS models to enhance predictive accuracy across diverse populations. Continued research and validation will be essential to unlocking the full clinical potential of PRS in VTE management.