认知扭曲背景下青少年焦虑障碍的评价。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ezgi Karagöz Tanıgör, Gonca Özyurt, Yusuf Öztürk, Ali Evren Tufan, Aynur Akay
{"title":"认知扭曲背景下青少年焦虑障碍的评价。","authors":"Ezgi Karagöz Tanıgör, Gonca Özyurt, Yusuf Öztürk, Ali Evren Tufan, Aynur Akay","doi":"10.5152/pcp.2025.241047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background: This study aimed to investigate the differences in cognitive distortions between patients with anxiety disorder (AD) and healthy controls, investigate the relationship between anxiety levels and cognitive distortions in AD, and investigate whether accompanying symptoms in AD had an impact on cognitive distortions Methods: Eighty-nine adolescents diagnosed with AD and 94 healthy adolescents were assessed using The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Cognitive Distortions Scale (CDS), and the effects of major depressive disorder (MDD) were evaluated. Results: All cognitive distortions except catastrophizing were more problematic in AD. It also assessed the effects of comorbid MDD with AD on cognitive distortions. Another finding that was obtained in this study was that thought characteristics such as mindreading, catastrophizing, all-or-nothing thinking, emotional reasoning, personalization, minimizing the positive, and overgeneralization, CDS total scores were statistically significantly higher in the AD group with comorbid MDD. Conclusion: The study indicates that some cognitive distortions may be prevalent in AD or AD with comorbid depression. The importance of this study is the probability of laying the groundwork for future research in adolescents, the development of cognitive anxiety models, and guiding treatment practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":20847,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":"35 3","pages":"226-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders in the Context of Cognitive Distortion.\",\"authors\":\"Ezgi Karagöz Tanıgör, Gonca Özyurt, Yusuf Öztürk, Ali Evren Tufan, Aynur Akay\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/pcp.2025.241047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background: This study aimed to investigate the differences in cognitive distortions between patients with anxiety disorder (AD) and healthy controls, investigate the relationship between anxiety levels and cognitive distortions in AD, and investigate whether accompanying symptoms in AD had an impact on cognitive distortions Methods: Eighty-nine adolescents diagnosed with AD and 94 healthy adolescents were assessed using The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Cognitive Distortions Scale (CDS), and the effects of major depressive disorder (MDD) were evaluated. Results: All cognitive distortions except catastrophizing were more problematic in AD. It also assessed the effects of comorbid MDD with AD on cognitive distortions. Another finding that was obtained in this study was that thought characteristics such as mindreading, catastrophizing, all-or-nothing thinking, emotional reasoning, personalization, minimizing the positive, and overgeneralization, CDS total scores were statistically significantly higher in the AD group with comorbid MDD. Conclusion: The study indicates that some cognitive distortions may be prevalent in AD or AD with comorbid depression. The importance of this study is the probability of laying the groundwork for future research in adolescents, the development of cognitive anxiety models, and guiding treatment practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"35 3\",\"pages\":\"226-233\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12371742/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2025.241047\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/pcp.2025.241047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在探讨焦虑障碍(AD)患者与健康对照组认知扭曲的差异,探讨AD患者焦虑水平与认知扭曲的关系,以及AD伴发症状是否对认知扭曲有影响。采用儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表、儿童焦虑相关情绪障碍筛查(SCARED)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、认知扭曲量表(CDS)对89名被诊断为AD的青少年和94名健康青少年进行评估,并评估重度抑郁症(MDD)的影响。结果:除灾难化外,所有认知扭曲在AD中都更成问题。该研究还评估了重度抑郁症合并阿尔茨海默病对认知扭曲的影响。本研究的另一个发现是,AD合并MDD组的读心、灾难化、全有或全无思维、情绪推理、个性化、最小化积极、过度概括等思维特征的CDS总分在统计学上显著更高。结论:本研究提示阿尔茨海默病或阿尔茨海默病合并抑郁可能普遍存在一些认知扭曲。本研究的重要性在于为未来的青少年研究奠定基础,发展认知焦虑模型,指导治疗实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders in the Context of Cognitive Distortion.

Evaluation of Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders in the Context of Cognitive Distortion.

Evaluation of Adolescents with Anxiety Disorders in the Context of Cognitive Distortion.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the differences in cognitive distortions between patients with anxiety disorder (AD) and healthy controls, investigate the relationship between anxiety levels and cognitive distortions in AD, and investigate whether accompanying symptoms in AD had an impact on cognitive distortions Methods: Eighty-nine adolescents diagnosed with AD and 94 healthy adolescents were assessed using The Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Cognitive Distortions Scale (CDS), and the effects of major depressive disorder (MDD) were evaluated. Results: All cognitive distortions except catastrophizing were more problematic in AD. It also assessed the effects of comorbid MDD with AD on cognitive distortions. Another finding that was obtained in this study was that thought characteristics such as mindreading, catastrophizing, all-or-nothing thinking, emotional reasoning, personalization, minimizing the positive, and overgeneralization, CDS total scores were statistically significantly higher in the AD group with comorbid MDD. Conclusion: The study indicates that some cognitive distortions may be prevalent in AD or AD with comorbid depression. The importance of this study is the probability of laying the groundwork for future research in adolescents, the development of cognitive anxiety models, and guiding treatment practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology
Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology aims to reach a national and international audience and will accept submissions from authors worldwide. It gives high priority to original studies of interest to clinicians and scientists in applied and basic neurosciences and related disciplines. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes high quality research targeted to specialists, residents and scientists in psychiatry, psychology, neurology, pharmacology, molecular biology, genetics, physiology, neurochemistry, and related sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信