{"title":"通过深度图学习改进AlphaFold模型质量自评估。","authors":"Jacob Verburgt, Zicong Zhang, Daisuke Kihara","doi":"10.1002/pro.70274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, significant advancements have been made in deep learning-based computational modeling of proteins, with DeepMind's AlphaFold2 standing out as a landmark achievement. These computationally modeled protein structures not only provide atomic coordinates but also include self-confidence metrics to assess the relative quality of the modeling, either for individual residues or the entire protein. However, these self-confidence scores are not always reliable; for instance, poorly modeled regions of a protein may sometimes be assigned high confidence. To address this limitation, we introduce Equivariant Quality Assessment Folding (EQAFold), an enhanced framework that refines the Local Distance Difference Test prediction head of AlphaFold to generate more accurate self-confidence scores. Our results demonstrate that EQAFold outperforms the standard AlphaFold architecture and recent model quality assessment protocols in providing more reliable confidence metrics. Source code for EQAFold is available at https://github.com/kiharalab/EQAFold_public.</p>","PeriodicalId":20761,"journal":{"name":"Protein Science","volume":"34 9","pages":"e70274"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AlphaFold model quality self-assessment improvement via deep graph learning.\",\"authors\":\"Jacob Verburgt, Zicong Zhang, Daisuke Kihara\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pro.70274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years, significant advancements have been made in deep learning-based computational modeling of proteins, with DeepMind's AlphaFold2 standing out as a landmark achievement. These computationally modeled protein structures not only provide atomic coordinates but also include self-confidence metrics to assess the relative quality of the modeling, either for individual residues or the entire protein. However, these self-confidence scores are not always reliable; for instance, poorly modeled regions of a protein may sometimes be assigned high confidence. To address this limitation, we introduce Equivariant Quality Assessment Folding (EQAFold), an enhanced framework that refines the Local Distance Difference Test prediction head of AlphaFold to generate more accurate self-confidence scores. Our results demonstrate that EQAFold outperforms the standard AlphaFold architecture and recent model quality assessment protocols in providing more reliable confidence metrics. Source code for EQAFold is available at https://github.com/kiharalab/EQAFold_public.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Protein Science\",\"volume\":\"34 9\",\"pages\":\"e70274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12359199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Protein Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70274\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protein Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.70274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
AlphaFold model quality self-assessment improvement via deep graph learning.
In recent years, significant advancements have been made in deep learning-based computational modeling of proteins, with DeepMind's AlphaFold2 standing out as a landmark achievement. These computationally modeled protein structures not only provide atomic coordinates but also include self-confidence metrics to assess the relative quality of the modeling, either for individual residues or the entire protein. However, these self-confidence scores are not always reliable; for instance, poorly modeled regions of a protein may sometimes be assigned high confidence. To address this limitation, we introduce Equivariant Quality Assessment Folding (EQAFold), an enhanced framework that refines the Local Distance Difference Test prediction head of AlphaFold to generate more accurate self-confidence scores. Our results demonstrate that EQAFold outperforms the standard AlphaFold architecture and recent model quality assessment protocols in providing more reliable confidence metrics. Source code for EQAFold is available at https://github.com/kiharalab/EQAFold_public.
期刊介绍:
Protein Science, the flagship journal of The Protein Society, is a publication that focuses on advancing fundamental knowledge in the field of protein molecules. The journal welcomes original reports and review articles that contribute to our understanding of protein function, structure, folding, design, and evolution.
Additionally, Protein Science encourages papers that explore the applications of protein science in various areas such as therapeutics, protein-based biomaterials, bionanotechnology, synthetic biology, and bioelectronics.
The journal accepts manuscript submissions in any suitable format for review, with the requirement of converting the manuscript to journal-style format only upon acceptance for publication.
Protein Science is indexed and abstracted in numerous databases, including the Agricultural & Environmental Science Database (ProQuest), Biological Science Database (ProQuest), CAS: Chemical Abstracts Service (ACS), Embase (Elsevier), Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest), Health Research Premium Collection (ProQuest), Materials Science & Engineering Database (ProQuest), MEDLINE/PubMed (NLM), Natural Science Collection (ProQuest), and SciTech Premium Collection (ProQuest).