枯草芽孢杆菌防治油桃花枯病。

IF 4.4 2区 农林科学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Johanna Wesche, Guido Schnabel
{"title":"枯草芽孢杆菌防治油桃花枯病。","authors":"Johanna Wesche, Guido Schnabel","doi":"10.1094/PDIS-06-25-1318-SC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monilinia fructicola, the causal agent of blossom blight and brown rot in peaches and nectarines, is currently managed with chemical fungicide programs in the Southeastern United States. However, increasing fungicide resistance and regulatory pressure to reduce synthetic fungicide use highlight the need for alternative strategies. This two-year field study evaluated the efficacy of the biologicals Bacillus subtilis AFS032321 formulated as Theia and Pseudomonas chlororaphis AFS009 formulated as Howler EVO alone and in combination, for blossom blight control in nectarines at the Musser Fruit Research Center in Seneca, SC. In addition, Theia was compared to the commercial standards at three different farms in five cultivars. Theia significantly reduced blossom blight in both years with an observed control efficacy of 79.2% in 2025 and 57.3% in 2024 and was statistically equivalent to the control efficacy of 64.9% for synthetic fungicide propiconazole (Propi-Star EC) in 2025. In contrast, Howler EVO had no significant effect on disease reduction. Notably, the combination of the two biologicals in field trials at the experiment station resulted in antagonistic interactions. On nutrient agar, B. subtilis AFS032321 colony formation was inhibited by Howler EVO even at 1/10 of the label rate, supporting the field observation of antagonism between the two biologicals. No significant differences were found between Theia and the commercial standard programs for blossom blight control in commercial farm field trials. These findings demonstrate the potential but also highlight the vulnerability of biological use for blossom blight management in nectarines and peaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":20063,"journal":{"name":"Plant disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of blossom blight in nectarine and peach with <i>Bacillus subtilis</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Wesche, Guido Schnabel\",\"doi\":\"10.1094/PDIS-06-25-1318-SC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monilinia fructicola, the causal agent of blossom blight and brown rot in peaches and nectarines, is currently managed with chemical fungicide programs in the Southeastern United States. However, increasing fungicide resistance and regulatory pressure to reduce synthetic fungicide use highlight the need for alternative strategies. This two-year field study evaluated the efficacy of the biologicals Bacillus subtilis AFS032321 formulated as Theia and Pseudomonas chlororaphis AFS009 formulated as Howler EVO alone and in combination, for blossom blight control in nectarines at the Musser Fruit Research Center in Seneca, SC. In addition, Theia was compared to the commercial standards at three different farms in five cultivars. Theia significantly reduced blossom blight in both years with an observed control efficacy of 79.2% in 2025 and 57.3% in 2024 and was statistically equivalent to the control efficacy of 64.9% for synthetic fungicide propiconazole (Propi-Star EC) in 2025. In contrast, Howler EVO had no significant effect on disease reduction. Notably, the combination of the two biologicals in field trials at the experiment station resulted in antagonistic interactions. On nutrient agar, B. subtilis AFS032321 colony formation was inhibited by Howler EVO even at 1/10 of the label rate, supporting the field observation of antagonism between the two biologicals. No significant differences were found between Theia and the commercial standard programs for blossom blight control in commercial farm field trials. These findings demonstrate the potential but also highlight the vulnerability of biological use for blossom blight management in nectarines and peaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-25-1318-SC\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant disease","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-25-1318-SC","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

桃和油桃的花枯萎病和褐腐病的致病因子——果霉菌,目前在美国东南部用化学杀菌剂进行管理。然而,杀菌剂耐药性的增加和减少合成杀菌剂使用的监管压力突出了替代策略的必要性。在美国南卡州塞内卡的Musser水果研究中心进行了为期两年的实地研究,评估了枯草芽孢杆菌AFS032321和绿假单胞菌AFS009分别作为Theia制剂和Howler EVO制剂单独和联合防治油桃花枯病的效果。此外,还将5个品种的3个不同农场的Theia与商业标准进行了比较。两年对花枯病的防治效果分别为79.2%和57.3%,与合成杀菌剂丙环唑(propiconazole, proc - star EC)的防治效果64.9%相当。相比之下,Howler EVO对疾病的减少没有显著作用。值得注意的是,在实验站的田间试验中,两种生物制剂的组合产生了拮抗相互作用。在营养琼脂上,Howler EVO对枯草芽孢杆菌AFS032321菌落形成的抑制率为标记率的1/10,支持了两种生物制剂的拮抗作用。在商业农场田间试验中,Theia与商业标准方案之间无显著差异。这些发现显示了在油桃和桃子的花疫病管理中生物利用的潜力,但也突出了其脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of blossom blight in nectarine and peach with Bacillus subtilis.

Monilinia fructicola, the causal agent of blossom blight and brown rot in peaches and nectarines, is currently managed with chemical fungicide programs in the Southeastern United States. However, increasing fungicide resistance and regulatory pressure to reduce synthetic fungicide use highlight the need for alternative strategies. This two-year field study evaluated the efficacy of the biologicals Bacillus subtilis AFS032321 formulated as Theia and Pseudomonas chlororaphis AFS009 formulated as Howler EVO alone and in combination, for blossom blight control in nectarines at the Musser Fruit Research Center in Seneca, SC. In addition, Theia was compared to the commercial standards at three different farms in five cultivars. Theia significantly reduced blossom blight in both years with an observed control efficacy of 79.2% in 2025 and 57.3% in 2024 and was statistically equivalent to the control efficacy of 64.9% for synthetic fungicide propiconazole (Propi-Star EC) in 2025. In contrast, Howler EVO had no significant effect on disease reduction. Notably, the combination of the two biologicals in field trials at the experiment station resulted in antagonistic interactions. On nutrient agar, B. subtilis AFS032321 colony formation was inhibited by Howler EVO even at 1/10 of the label rate, supporting the field observation of antagonism between the two biologicals. No significant differences were found between Theia and the commercial standard programs for blossom blight control in commercial farm field trials. These findings demonstrate the potential but also highlight the vulnerability of biological use for blossom blight management in nectarines and peaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plant disease
Plant disease 农林科学-植物科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1993
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Plant Disease is the leading international journal for rapid reporting of research on new, emerging, and established plant diseases. The journal publishes papers that describe basic and applied research focusing on practical aspects of disease diagnosis, development, and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信