评估矢状旁椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射后双侧症状缓解。

IF 2.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.143088
Jamal Hasoon, Christopher L Robinson, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Alan D Kaye
{"title":"评估矢状旁椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射后双侧症状缓解。","authors":"Jamal Hasoon, Christopher L Robinson, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Alan D Kaye","doi":"10.52965/001c.143088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESIs) using a parasagittal approach are frequently employed to manage lumbar radicular pain. The degree of contralateral symptom relief achieved with parasagittal ILESIs remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of parasagittal ILESIs in providing ipsilateral and contralateral symptom relief in patients with bilateral lumbar radiculopathy and unilateral contrast spread.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 12 patients with bilateral lumbar radicular symptoms who underwent parasagittal ILESIs under fluoroscopic guidance. Patient-reported symptom relief was assessed for both ipsilateral and contralateral sides at a two-week follow-up visit or phone call. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patterns in symptom relief across the cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients experienced significant relief on the ipsilateral side, with reported improvement ranging from 60% to 100% (mean: 84.6%). Contralateral relief was more variable, ranging from 0% to 90% (mean: 37.5%). No complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parasagittal ILESIs provide more consistent and substantial relief of ipsilateral lumbar radicular symptoms. Contralateral relief is less predictable and may be limited by needle placement and the spread of medication. These findings support the use of parasagittal ILESIs in cases of unilateral or dominant-side radicular pain. For patients with significant bilateral symptoms, midline ILESIs or bilateral transforaminal injections may be more effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify predictors of bilateral relief and optimize procedural technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"17 ","pages":"143088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Bilateral Symptom Relief Following Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections.\",\"authors\":\"Jamal Hasoon, Christopher L Robinson, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Alan D Kaye\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.143088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESIs) using a parasagittal approach are frequently employed to manage lumbar radicular pain. The degree of contralateral symptom relief achieved with parasagittal ILESIs remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of parasagittal ILESIs in providing ipsilateral and contralateral symptom relief in patients with bilateral lumbar radiculopathy and unilateral contrast spread.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on 12 patients with bilateral lumbar radicular symptoms who underwent parasagittal ILESIs under fluoroscopic guidance. Patient-reported symptom relief was assessed for both ipsilateral and contralateral sides at a two-week follow-up visit or phone call. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patterns in symptom relief across the cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients experienced significant relief on the ipsilateral side, with reported improvement ranging from 60% to 100% (mean: 84.6%). Contralateral relief was more variable, ranging from 0% to 90% (mean: 37.5%). No complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Parasagittal ILESIs provide more consistent and substantial relief of ipsilateral lumbar radicular symptoms. Contralateral relief is less predictable and may be limited by needle placement and the spread of medication. These findings support the use of parasagittal ILESIs in cases of unilateral or dominant-side radicular pain. For patients with significant bilateral symptoms, midline ILESIs or bilateral transforaminal injections may be more effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify predictors of bilateral relief and optimize procedural technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"143088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.143088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.143088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:椎板间硬膜外类固醇注射(ILESIs)常用于治疗腰椎神经根性疼痛。对侧症状缓解的程度,实现与旁矢状动脉ilis仍未充分探讨。本研究旨在评估旁指状ILESIs在缓解双侧腰椎神经根病和单侧造影剂扩散患者的同侧和对侧症状方面的短期有效性。方法:回顾性分析12例有双侧腰椎神经根症状的患者在透视引导下行旁矢状动脉ilis。患者报告的症状缓解在两周的随访或电话中对同侧和对侧进行评估。描述性统计用于评估整个队列中症状缓解的模式。结果:所有患者的同侧疼痛都得到了显著缓解,报告的改善范围从60%到100%(平均:84.6%)。对侧缓解变化较大,范围从0%到90%(平均:37.5%)。无并发症报道。结论:矢状旁髂内固定术对同侧腰椎神经根症状提供更一致和实质性的缓解。对侧缓解难以预测,可能受到针头放置和药物传播的限制。这些发现支持在单侧或主侧神经根性疼痛的病例中使用旁矢状动脉ilis。对于双侧症状明显的患者,中线ilis或双侧经椎间孔注射可能更有效。进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的,以确定双侧缓解的预测因素和优化程序技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Bilateral Symptom Relief Following Parasagittal Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injections.

Introduction: Interlaminar epidural steroid injections (ILESIs) using a parasagittal approach are frequently employed to manage lumbar radicular pain. The degree of contralateral symptom relief achieved with parasagittal ILESIs remains underexplored. This study aims to evaluate the short-term effectiveness of parasagittal ILESIs in providing ipsilateral and contralateral symptom relief in patients with bilateral lumbar radiculopathy and unilateral contrast spread.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 12 patients with bilateral lumbar radicular symptoms who underwent parasagittal ILESIs under fluoroscopic guidance. Patient-reported symptom relief was assessed for both ipsilateral and contralateral sides at a two-week follow-up visit or phone call. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patterns in symptom relief across the cohort.

Results: All patients experienced significant relief on the ipsilateral side, with reported improvement ranging from 60% to 100% (mean: 84.6%). Contralateral relief was more variable, ranging from 0% to 90% (mean: 37.5%). No complications were reported.

Conclusion: Parasagittal ILESIs provide more consistent and substantial relief of ipsilateral lumbar radicular symptoms. Contralateral relief is less predictable and may be limited by needle placement and the spread of medication. These findings support the use of parasagittal ILESIs in cases of unilateral or dominant-side radicular pain. For patients with significant bilateral symptoms, midline ILESIs or bilateral transforaminal injections may be more effective. Further prospective studies are warranted to identify predictors of bilateral relief and optimize procedural technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信