Halil Onder, Nidanur Kocabacak, Numan Bulut, Selcuk Comoglu
{"title":"帕金森病患者左旋多巴选择反应时间变化的研究。","authors":"Halil Onder, Nidanur Kocabacak, Numan Bulut, Selcuk Comoglu","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2025.2549042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the alterations in the choice reaction time (RT) with levodopa in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Via concurrent clinical assessments, we aimed to provide perspectives regarding the clinical significance of these alterations and responsible pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from consecutive PD patients who applied to our Movement Disorders Polyclinics between September/2024 October/2024. Demographic, clinical features, and the MDS-UPDRS-3 scale (-on and -off) were evaluated. The Blazepod technology was used to measure choice RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 25 PD patients with a mean age of 65.7 ± 9.0 y (F/M = 9/16). The comparative analyses between medication-off and -on states revealed that the MDS-UPDRS-3 scores decreased significantly during the medication-on states (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.09). Besides, all the parameters related to reaction time including RT, number of hits, and errors improved during medication-on state (d = 0.71, d = 0.88, d = 0.72, respectively). The RT-off showed moderate positive correlations with the UPDRS-3 scores (CC:0.416, <i>p</i> = 0.039). The left side RT-off and also the right-side RT-off showed moderate positive correlations with the left-side UPDRS-3-'off' scores (CC:0.499, <i>p</i> = 0.011, CC:0.440, <i>p</i> = 0.028, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, we found significant improvements in all the measures of choice RT after levodopa intake which reached moderate-large effects sizes. Our findings suggest that RT impairment in PD may involve shared neural mechanisms, with possible lateralized contributions that require further investigation. The RT measures may also constitute an alternative method for measuring LR and needs to be tested in the distinct clinical scenarios in future-related studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of changes in the choice reaction time with levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Halil Onder, Nidanur Kocabacak, Numan Bulut, Selcuk Comoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01616412.2025.2549042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the alterations in the choice reaction time (RT) with levodopa in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Via concurrent clinical assessments, we aimed to provide perspectives regarding the clinical significance of these alterations and responsible pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited from consecutive PD patients who applied to our Movement Disorders Polyclinics between September/2024 October/2024. Demographic, clinical features, and the MDS-UPDRS-3 scale (-on and -off) were evaluated. The Blazepod technology was used to measure choice RT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 25 PD patients with a mean age of 65.7 ± 9.0 y (F/M = 9/16). The comparative analyses between medication-off and -on states revealed that the MDS-UPDRS-3 scores decreased significantly during the medication-on states (<i>p</i> < 0.001, d = 1.09). Besides, all the parameters related to reaction time including RT, number of hits, and errors improved during medication-on state (d = 0.71, d = 0.88, d = 0.72, respectively). The RT-off showed moderate positive correlations with the UPDRS-3 scores (CC:0.416, <i>p</i> = 0.039). The left side RT-off and also the right-side RT-off showed moderate positive correlations with the left-side UPDRS-3-'off' scores (CC:0.499, <i>p</i> = 0.011, CC:0.440, <i>p</i> = 0.028, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, we found significant improvements in all the measures of choice RT after levodopa intake which reached moderate-large effects sizes. Our findings suggest that RT impairment in PD may involve shared neural mechanisms, with possible lateralized contributions that require further investigation. The RT measures may also constitute an alternative method for measuring LR and needs to be tested in the distinct clinical scenarios in future-related studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2549042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2025.2549042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨左旋多巴对帕金森病患者选择反应时间(RT)的影响。通过同步临床评估,我们旨在提供有关这些改变的临床意义和相关病理生理学的观点。方法:参与者从9月/2024年10月/2024年10月/2024年期间申请我们的运动障碍综合诊所的连续PD患者中招募。对人口统计学、临床特征和MDS-UPDRS-3量表(开和关)进行评估。结果:我们纳入25例PD患者,平均年龄为65.7±9.0岁(F/M = 9/16)。停药状态与开药状态的比较分析显示,在停药状态下,MDS-UPDRS-3评分显著下降(p p = 0.039)。左侧RT-off和右侧RT-off与左侧UPDRS-3“off”得分呈中度正相关(CC:0.499, p = 0.011, CC:0.440, p = 0.028)。结论:综上所述,我们发现左旋多巴摄入后,选择RT的所有测量都有显著改善,达到中大型效应。我们的研究结果表明PD的RT损伤可能涉及共享的神经机制,可能的侧向贡献需要进一步研究。RT测量也可能是测量LR的另一种方法,需要在未来的相关研究中在不同的临床情况下进行测试。
Investigation of changes in the choice reaction time with levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Objective: To investigate the alterations in the choice reaction time (RT) with levodopa in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Via concurrent clinical assessments, we aimed to provide perspectives regarding the clinical significance of these alterations and responsible pathophysiology.
Methods: Participants were recruited from consecutive PD patients who applied to our Movement Disorders Polyclinics between September/2024 October/2024. Demographic, clinical features, and the MDS-UPDRS-3 scale (-on and -off) were evaluated. The Blazepod technology was used to measure choice RT.
Results: We included 25 PD patients with a mean age of 65.7 ± 9.0 y (F/M = 9/16). The comparative analyses between medication-off and -on states revealed that the MDS-UPDRS-3 scores decreased significantly during the medication-on states (p < 0.001, d = 1.09). Besides, all the parameters related to reaction time including RT, number of hits, and errors improved during medication-on state (d = 0.71, d = 0.88, d = 0.72, respectively). The RT-off showed moderate positive correlations with the UPDRS-3 scores (CC:0.416, p = 0.039). The left side RT-off and also the right-side RT-off showed moderate positive correlations with the left-side UPDRS-3-'off' scores (CC:0.499, p = 0.011, CC:0.440, p = 0.028, respectively).
Conclusion: In conclusion, we found significant improvements in all the measures of choice RT after levodopa intake which reached moderate-large effects sizes. Our findings suggest that RT impairment in PD may involve shared neural mechanisms, with possible lateralized contributions that require further investigation. The RT measures may also constitute an alternative method for measuring LR and needs to be tested in the distinct clinical scenarios in future-related studies.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields.
The scope of the journal includes:
•Stem cell applications
•Molecular neuroscience
•Neuropharmacology
•Neuroradiology
•Neurochemistry
•Biomathematical models
•Endovascular neurosurgery
•Innovation in neurosurgery.