胸腔镜手术后局部镇痛的程序性间歇输注与持续输注:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-08-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S530018
Dongqing Ren, Zhilong Liu, Yanjun Gao, Na Xie, Yu Lu, Li Ge
{"title":"胸腔镜手术后局部镇痛的程序性间歇输注与持续输注:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Dongqing Ren, Zhilong Liu, Yanjun Gao, Na Xie, Yu Lu, Li Ge","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S530018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous regional analgesia techniques have emerged as a more effective alternative for postoperative analgesia, but the clinical efficacy of infusion modes in thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of programmed intermittent bolus infusion (PIBI) with continuous infusion (CI) for regional analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant research from inception to March 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PIBI with CI for regional analgesia following thoracoscopic surgery were included. The meta-analysis was made by using ReMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 7 RCTs with 394 patients. For resting VAS at 6 h, there was no significant difference between PIBI and CI (MD = -0.52, 95% CI: -1.23 to 0.20). PIBI was more likely to reduce the resting VAS at 12 h, movement VAS at 12 h, and morphine consumption in first 24 h. PIBI had lower local anesthetic consumption and wider range of sensory blockade than CI. However, there were no significant difference between PIBI and CI in terms of the resting VAS at 24 h, resting VAS at 48 h, movement VAS at 6 h, movement VAS at 24 h, movement VAS at 48 h, morphine consumption in second 24 h, and number of people using additional analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIBI provided a lower local anesthetic consumption and a wider sensory blockade compared to CI for regional analgesia following thoracoscopic surgery, although no significant clinical differences were observed in postoperative pain scores, opioid consumptions, and number of people using additional analgesics.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>The heterogeneity may influence the pooled estimates, the conclusion was only suitable for pulmonary surgery, the lack of long-term follow-up data on chronic pain outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"4073-4083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358133/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Programmed Intermittent Bolus versus Continuous Infusion for Regional Analgesia Following Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dongqing Ren, Zhilong Liu, Yanjun Gao, Na Xie, Yu Lu, Li Ge\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S530018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous regional analgesia techniques have emerged as a more effective alternative for postoperative analgesia, but the clinical efficacy of infusion modes in thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of programmed intermittent bolus infusion (PIBI) with continuous infusion (CI) for regional analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant research from inception to March 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PIBI with CI for regional analgesia following thoracoscopic surgery were included. The meta-analysis was made by using ReMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 7 RCTs with 394 patients. For resting VAS at 6 h, there was no significant difference between PIBI and CI (MD = -0.52, 95% CI: -1.23 to 0.20). PIBI was more likely to reduce the resting VAS at 12 h, movement VAS at 12 h, and morphine consumption in first 24 h. PIBI had lower local anesthetic consumption and wider range of sensory blockade than CI. However, there were no significant difference between PIBI and CI in terms of the resting VAS at 24 h, resting VAS at 48 h, movement VAS at 6 h, movement VAS at 24 h, movement VAS at 48 h, morphine consumption in second 24 h, and number of people using additional analgesics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIBI provided a lower local anesthetic consumption and a wider sensory blockade compared to CI for regional analgesia following thoracoscopic surgery, although no significant clinical differences were observed in postoperative pain scores, opioid consumptions, and number of people using additional analgesics.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>The heterogeneity may influence the pooled estimates, the conclusion was only suitable for pulmonary surgery, the lack of long-term follow-up data on chronic pain outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"4073-4083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358133/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S530018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S530018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:连续局部镇痛技术已成为一种更有效的术后镇痛替代方法,但在胸腔镜手术中输液方式的临床疗效仍存在争议。本系统综述和荟萃分析比较了程序间歇输注(PIBI)和连续输注(CI)对胸腔镜手术患者局部镇痛的疗效。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索自成立至2025年3月的相关研究。纳入比较PIBI与CI用于胸腔镜手术后局部镇痛的随机对照试验(RCTs)。采用ReMan 5.4软件进行meta分析。结果:我们纳入7项随机对照试验,共394例患者。对于6 h的静息VAS, PIBI和CI之间无显著差异(MD = -0.52, 95% CI: -1.23 ~ 0.20)。PIBI更有可能降低12 h静息VAS、12 h运动VAS和前24 h吗啡消耗。PIBI比CI具有更低的局麻消耗和更大的感觉阻断范围。然而,PIBI和CI在24 h静息VAS、48 h静息VAS、6 h运动VAS、24 h运动VAS、48 h运动VAS、第二个24 h吗啡用量、使用额外镇痛药的人数等方面无显著差异。结论:与CI相比,PIBI提供了更低的局部麻醉消耗和更广泛的感觉封锁,用于胸腔镜手术后的局部镇痛,尽管在术后疼痛评分、阿片类药物消耗和使用额外镇痛药的人数方面没有观察到显著的临床差异。局限性:异质性可能影响汇总估计,结论仅适用于肺部手术,缺乏慢性疼痛结局的长期随访数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Programmed Intermittent Bolus versus Continuous Infusion for Regional Analgesia Following Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Continuous regional analgesia techniques have emerged as a more effective alternative for postoperative analgesia, but the clinical efficacy of infusion modes in thoracoscopic surgery remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of programmed intermittent bolus infusion (PIBI) with continuous infusion (CI) for regional analgesia in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant research from inception to March 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PIBI with CI for regional analgesia following thoracoscopic surgery were included. The meta-analysis was made by using ReMan 5.4 software.

Results: We included 7 RCTs with 394 patients. For resting VAS at 6 h, there was no significant difference between PIBI and CI (MD = -0.52, 95% CI: -1.23 to 0.20). PIBI was more likely to reduce the resting VAS at 12 h, movement VAS at 12 h, and morphine consumption in first 24 h. PIBI had lower local anesthetic consumption and wider range of sensory blockade than CI. However, there were no significant difference between PIBI and CI in terms of the resting VAS at 24 h, resting VAS at 48 h, movement VAS at 6 h, movement VAS at 24 h, movement VAS at 48 h, morphine consumption in second 24 h, and number of people using additional analgesics.

Conclusion: PIBI provided a lower local anesthetic consumption and a wider sensory blockade compared to CI for regional analgesia following thoracoscopic surgery, although no significant clinical differences were observed in postoperative pain scores, opioid consumptions, and number of people using additional analgesics.

Limitation: The heterogeneity may influence the pooled estimates, the conclusion was only suitable for pulmonary surgery, the lack of long-term follow-up data on chronic pain outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信