探索疼痛临床专家对阿片类药物优化治疗英国慢性非恶性疼痛的看法。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-08-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S512418
Aziza Alenezi, Vibhu Paudyal, Asma Yahyouche
{"title":"探索疼痛临床专家对阿片类药物优化治疗英国慢性非恶性疼痛的看法。","authors":"Aziza Alenezi, Vibhu Paudyal, Asma Yahyouche","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S512418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of opioids for chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) offers limited efficacy and carries the potential for addiction. Healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care settings face challenges when attempting to optimise opioid medications. There are limited studies that investigated the barriers and enablers to opioid reduction, cessation, and optimisation, specifically from a pain clinical specialist perspective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores pain clinical specialists' views on challenges in opioid prescription management-including optimization and tapering-and their interactions with patients and prescribers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited through pain clinic, webinars Email outreach, and professional networks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) with 11 pain clinical specialists (8 consultants and 3 pharmacists) from NHS England, out of 15 participants who initially expressed interest, recruited via professional networks. Thematic analysis employed Framework Approach with dual coding.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Eleven participants, comprising eight pain doctors and three clinical pharmacists, provided insights. Analysis revealed four key findings: (1) A paradigm shift away from long-term opioid therapy due to concerns about dependency and inadequate pain relief; (2) Strong preference for multidisciplinary, personalized treatment approaches; (3) Significant system-level barriers including care fragmentation and inadequate consultation time; (4) Critical need for enhanced clinician training and patient education programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimizing opioid use for CNMP requires fundamental changes to current practice, including implementation of integrated care pathways, extended consultation times, and comprehensive education initiatives. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for improving pain management while reducing inappropriate opioid prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"4037-4051"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Pain Clinical Specialists' Perspectives on Opioid Optimization for Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in England.\",\"authors\":\"Aziza Alenezi, Vibhu Paudyal, Asma Yahyouche\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S512418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of opioids for chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) offers limited efficacy and carries the potential for addiction. Healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care settings face challenges when attempting to optimise opioid medications. There are limited studies that investigated the barriers and enablers to opioid reduction, cessation, and optimisation, specifically from a pain clinical specialist perspective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explores pain clinical specialists' views on challenges in opioid prescription management-including optimization and tapering-and their interactions with patients and prescribers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were recruited through pain clinic, webinars Email outreach, and professional networks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) with 11 pain clinical specialists (8 consultants and 3 pharmacists) from NHS England, out of 15 participants who initially expressed interest, recruited via professional networks. Thematic analysis employed Framework Approach with dual coding.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Eleven participants, comprising eight pain doctors and three clinical pharmacists, provided insights. Analysis revealed four key findings: (1) A paradigm shift away from long-term opioid therapy due to concerns about dependency and inadequate pain relief; (2) Strong preference for multidisciplinary, personalized treatment approaches; (3) Significant system-level barriers including care fragmentation and inadequate consultation time; (4) Critical need for enhanced clinician training and patient education programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Optimizing opioid use for CNMP requires fundamental changes to current practice, including implementation of integrated care pathways, extended consultation times, and comprehensive education initiatives. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for improving pain management while reducing inappropriate opioid prescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"4037-4051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12358125/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S512418\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S512418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用阿片类药物治疗慢性非恶性疼痛(CNMP)的疗效有限,并有成瘾的可能。初级和二级保健机构的卫生保健专业人员在试图优化阿片类药物时面临挑战。有有限的研究调查了阿片类药物减少、停止和优化的障碍和促进因素,特别是从疼痛临床专家的角度。目的:本研究探讨疼痛临床专家对阿片类药物处方管理挑战的看法,包括优化和减量,以及他们与患者和处方者的相互作用。方法:通过疼痛门诊、网络研讨会、电子邮件外展和专业网络招募参与者。采用基于理论领域框架(TDF)的指南进行了半结构化访谈,访谈对象是来自英国国家医疗服务体系的11名疼痛临床专家(8名咨询师和3名药剂师),15名参与者最初表示有兴趣,通过专业网络招募。主题分析采用框架法和双重编码。主要发现:包括8名疼痛医生和3名临床药剂师在内的11名参与者提供了见解。分析揭示了四个主要发现:(1)由于对依赖性和疼痛缓解不足的担忧,长期阿片类药物治疗的范式转变;(2)强烈偏好多学科、个性化的治疗方法;(3)严重的系统层面障碍,包括护理碎片化和咨询时间不足;(4)迫切需要加强临床医生培训和患者教育计划。结论:优化CNMP的阿片类药物使用需要从根本上改变当前的做法,包括实施综合护理途径,延长咨询时间和全面的教育举措。这些发现为改善疼痛管理提供了循证建议,同时减少不适当的阿片类药物处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Pain Clinical Specialists' Perspectives on Opioid Optimization for Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in England.

Exploring Pain Clinical Specialists' Perspectives on Opioid Optimization for Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in England.

Background: The use of opioids for chronic non-malignant pain (CNMP) offers limited efficacy and carries the potential for addiction. Healthcare professionals in both primary and secondary care settings face challenges when attempting to optimise opioid medications. There are limited studies that investigated the barriers and enablers to opioid reduction, cessation, and optimisation, specifically from a pain clinical specialist perspective.

Objective: This study explores pain clinical specialists' views on challenges in opioid prescription management-including optimization and tapering-and their interactions with patients and prescribers.

Methods: Participants were recruited through pain clinic, webinars Email outreach, and professional networks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) with 11 pain clinical specialists (8 consultants and 3 pharmacists) from NHS England, out of 15 participants who initially expressed interest, recruited via professional networks. Thematic analysis employed Framework Approach with dual coding.

Key findings: Eleven participants, comprising eight pain doctors and three clinical pharmacists, provided insights. Analysis revealed four key findings: (1) A paradigm shift away from long-term opioid therapy due to concerns about dependency and inadequate pain relief; (2) Strong preference for multidisciplinary, personalized treatment approaches; (3) Significant system-level barriers including care fragmentation and inadequate consultation time; (4) Critical need for enhanced clinician training and patient education programs.

Conclusion: Optimizing opioid use for CNMP requires fundamental changes to current practice, including implementation of integrated care pathways, extended consultation times, and comprehensive education initiatives. These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for improving pain management while reducing inappropriate opioid prescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信