Vinod Dasa, Wilson Ngai, Kevin Steele, Ronald Preblick, Heather Watson, Kevin L Ong
{"title":"膝关节内关节炎治疗的经济价值:美国视角。","authors":"Vinod Dasa, Wilson Ngai, Kevin Steele, Ronald Preblick, Heather Watson, Kevin L Ong","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2025.2549629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study compared the six-month medical/pharmacy costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for knee OA patients undergoing intra-articular therapy with different classes of hyaluronic acid (HA) (by molecular weight) or corticosteroid (ICS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients across high molecular weight (HMW) HA, medium molecular weight (MMW) HA, low molecular weight (LMW) HA, and ICS therapy groups were matched from a U.S. claims database (Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database), with a final size of 6,234 patients per group. Adjusted six-month medical/prescription costs per patient per month (PPPM), and HCRU rates and costs, were determined. Secondary endpoints included complication rates and adjusted costs, new prescription analgesic use, and adjunctive/supplemental intra-articular treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean adjusted PPPM medical costs were highest for LMW HA ($527.14), followed by HMW HA ($469.35) and MMW HA ($441.97) (<i>p</i> < .001), and lowest for the ICS group ($240.26; <i>p</i> < .001). Office visit, arthrocentesis, and subsequent ICS/arthrocentesis rates and corresponding costs, as well as costs for any complications, decreased from LMW HA to MMW HA to HMW HA. The ICS group had greater arthrocentesis, subsequent ICS/arthrocentesis, and office visit costs versus MMW and HMW HA groups. The ICS group had higher rates of new prescription analgesic use (15.8% versus 11.7%-12.2%) and adjunctive ICS (21.8% vs. 9.4%-11.1%) and HA (14.1% versus 1.6%-5.3%) treatment than the HA groups. HMW HA had the lowest rates of adjunctive non-index HA treatment.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Claims data contains limited clinical data and relied on the accuracy of coding of diagnoses and procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among HA products, HMW HA may provide greater short-term clinical and economic benefits. Additionally, intra-articular HA therapy may provide improved short-term clinical and economic results over ICS, in terms of lower rates of adjunctive intra-articular treatments, HCRU, and new prescription analgesic use. Complication rates were low reflecting the safety profiles of HA and ICS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"1334-1347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic value of intra-articular knee OA therapies: a U.S. perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Vinod Dasa, Wilson Ngai, Kevin Steele, Ronald Preblick, Heather Watson, Kevin L Ong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2025.2549629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study compared the six-month medical/pharmacy costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for knee OA patients undergoing intra-articular therapy with different classes of hyaluronic acid (HA) (by molecular weight) or corticosteroid (ICS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients across high molecular weight (HMW) HA, medium molecular weight (MMW) HA, low molecular weight (LMW) HA, and ICS therapy groups were matched from a U.S. claims database (Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database), with a final size of 6,234 patients per group. Adjusted six-month medical/prescription costs per patient per month (PPPM), and HCRU rates and costs, were determined. Secondary endpoints included complication rates and adjusted costs, new prescription analgesic use, and adjunctive/supplemental intra-articular treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean adjusted PPPM medical costs were highest for LMW HA ($527.14), followed by HMW HA ($469.35) and MMW HA ($441.97) (<i>p</i> < .001), and lowest for the ICS group ($240.26; <i>p</i> < .001). Office visit, arthrocentesis, and subsequent ICS/arthrocentesis rates and corresponding costs, as well as costs for any complications, decreased from LMW HA to MMW HA to HMW HA. The ICS group had greater arthrocentesis, subsequent ICS/arthrocentesis, and office visit costs versus MMW and HMW HA groups. The ICS group had higher rates of new prescription analgesic use (15.8% versus 11.7%-12.2%) and adjunctive ICS (21.8% vs. 9.4%-11.1%) and HA (14.1% versus 1.6%-5.3%) treatment than the HA groups. HMW HA had the lowest rates of adjunctive non-index HA treatment.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Claims data contains limited clinical data and relied on the accuracy of coding of diagnoses and procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among HA products, HMW HA may provide greater short-term clinical and economic benefits. Additionally, intra-articular HA therapy may provide improved short-term clinical and economic results over ICS, in terms of lower rates of adjunctive intra-articular treatments, HCRU, and new prescription analgesic use. Complication rates were low reflecting the safety profiles of HA and ICS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1334-1347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2549629\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2025.2549629","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic value of intra-articular knee OA therapies: a U.S. perspective.
Aims: This study compared the six-month medical/pharmacy costs and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for knee OA patients undergoing intra-articular therapy with different classes of hyaluronic acid (HA) (by molecular weight) or corticosteroid (ICS).
Materials and methods: Patients across high molecular weight (HMW) HA, medium molecular weight (MMW) HA, low molecular weight (LMW) HA, and ICS therapy groups were matched from a U.S. claims database (Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart Database), with a final size of 6,234 patients per group. Adjusted six-month medical/prescription costs per patient per month (PPPM), and HCRU rates and costs, were determined. Secondary endpoints included complication rates and adjusted costs, new prescription analgesic use, and adjunctive/supplemental intra-articular treatment.
Results: Mean adjusted PPPM medical costs were highest for LMW HA ($527.14), followed by HMW HA ($469.35) and MMW HA ($441.97) (p < .001), and lowest for the ICS group ($240.26; p < .001). Office visit, arthrocentesis, and subsequent ICS/arthrocentesis rates and corresponding costs, as well as costs for any complications, decreased from LMW HA to MMW HA to HMW HA. The ICS group had greater arthrocentesis, subsequent ICS/arthrocentesis, and office visit costs versus MMW and HMW HA groups. The ICS group had higher rates of new prescription analgesic use (15.8% versus 11.7%-12.2%) and adjunctive ICS (21.8% vs. 9.4%-11.1%) and HA (14.1% versus 1.6%-5.3%) treatment than the HA groups. HMW HA had the lowest rates of adjunctive non-index HA treatment.
Limitations: Claims data contains limited clinical data and relied on the accuracy of coding of diagnoses and procedures.
Conclusions: Among HA products, HMW HA may provide greater short-term clinical and economic benefits. Additionally, intra-articular HA therapy may provide improved short-term clinical and economic results over ICS, in terms of lower rates of adjunctive intra-articular treatments, HCRU, and new prescription analgesic use. Complication rates were low reflecting the safety profiles of HA and ICS.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication.
Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience