禽蛋中真菌毒素(黄曲霉毒素、脱氧雪腐菌醇、玉米赤霉烯酮和赭曲霉毒素A)的流行率和浓度:一项全球系统综述、荟萃分析和概率风险评估。

IF 2.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Yadolah Fakhri , Fereshteh Mehri , Vahid Ranaei , Zahra Pilevar , Farshid Soleimani , Rasul Nasiri , Amin Mousavi Khaneghah
{"title":"禽蛋中真菌毒素(黄曲霉毒素、脱氧雪腐菌醇、玉米赤霉烯酮和赭曲霉毒素A)的流行率和浓度:一项全球系统综述、荟萃分析和概率风险评估。","authors":"Yadolah Fakhri ,&nbsp;Fereshteh Mehri ,&nbsp;Vahid Ranaei ,&nbsp;Zahra Pilevar ,&nbsp;Farshid Soleimani ,&nbsp;Rasul Nasiri ,&nbsp;Amin Mousavi Khaneghah","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mycotoxins, such as aflatoxins (AFs), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEN), and ochratoxin A (OTA), present significant health risks due to their carcinogenic and toxic properties. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the global prevalence, concentration, and associated health risks of mycotoxins in domestic bird eggs. Following the PRISMA guideline, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2005–2024). Thirteen studies, encompassing 8,410 egg samples, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence and concentration of mycotoxins were estimated using random-effects models, while probabilistic risk assessment was performed via Monte Carlo simulation, calculating the Margin of Exposure (MOEs) and Hazard Quotient (HQ). The prevalence ranking of aflatoxins (AFs) in eggs was as follows: AFB<sub>1</sub> (19%) &gt; AFB<sub>2</sub> (12%) &gt; AFG<sub>1</sub> (10%) ≈ AFG<sub>2</sub> (10%). In terms of mean pooled concentration, mycotoxins followed this order: DON (83.93 µg/kg) &gt; ZEN (6.00 µg/kg) &gt; AFs (5.604 µg/kg) &gt; OTA (2.52 µg/kg). Concentrations of DON and OTA were higher in egg white than in yolk, whereas ZEN levels were higher in yolk. From a public health perspective, risk assessment revealed alarming exposure levels, particularly in China, Egypt, and Jordan, where MOE values for AFB<sub>1</sub> were significantly below the safety threshold (MOEs &lt; 10,000). Children were found to be at heightened risk due to their lower body weight and developing physiological systems, with MOEs as low as 3 in China. Additionally, HQ analyses indicated nonnegligible risks from DON, OTA, and ZEN, particularly in China and Poland, where dietary exposure may contribute to chronic toxicity or endocrine disruption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 10","pages":"Article 100600"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence and Concentration of Mycotoxins (Aflatoxins, Deoxynivalenol, Zearalenone, and Ochratoxin A) in Domestic Bird Eggs: A Global Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Probabilistic Risk Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Yadolah Fakhri ,&nbsp;Fereshteh Mehri ,&nbsp;Vahid Ranaei ,&nbsp;Zahra Pilevar ,&nbsp;Farshid Soleimani ,&nbsp;Rasul Nasiri ,&nbsp;Amin Mousavi Khaneghah\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Mycotoxins, such as aflatoxins (AFs), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEN), and ochratoxin A (OTA), present significant health risks due to their carcinogenic and toxic properties. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the global prevalence, concentration, and associated health risks of mycotoxins in domestic bird eggs. Following the PRISMA guideline, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2005–2024). Thirteen studies, encompassing 8,410 egg samples, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence and concentration of mycotoxins were estimated using random-effects models, while probabilistic risk assessment was performed via Monte Carlo simulation, calculating the Margin of Exposure (MOEs) and Hazard Quotient (HQ). The prevalence ranking of aflatoxins (AFs) in eggs was as follows: AFB<sub>1</sub> (19%) &gt; AFB<sub>2</sub> (12%) &gt; AFG<sub>1</sub> (10%) ≈ AFG<sub>2</sub> (10%). In terms of mean pooled concentration, mycotoxins followed this order: DON (83.93 µg/kg) &gt; ZEN (6.00 µg/kg) &gt; AFs (5.604 µg/kg) &gt; OTA (2.52 µg/kg). Concentrations of DON and OTA were higher in egg white than in yolk, whereas ZEN levels were higher in yolk. From a public health perspective, risk assessment revealed alarming exposure levels, particularly in China, Egypt, and Jordan, where MOE values for AFB<sub>1</sub> were significantly below the safety threshold (MOEs &lt; 10,000). Children were found to be at heightened risk due to their lower body weight and developing physiological systems, with MOEs as low as 3 in China. Additionally, HQ analyses indicated nonnegligible risks from DON, OTA, and ZEN, particularly in China and Poland, where dietary exposure may contribute to chronic toxicity or endocrine disruption.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 100600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001528\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25001528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

霉菌毒素,如黄曲霉毒素(AFs)、脱氧雪腐镰刀菌醇(DON)、玉米赤霉烯酮(ZEN)和赭曲霉毒素A (OTA),由于其致癌和毒性,存在重大的健康风险。本研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估家禽蛋中真菌毒素的全球流行程度、浓度和相关健康风险。遵循PRISMA指南,在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science(2005-2024)中进行了全面的搜索。研究人员分析了13项研究,包括8410个鸡蛋样本。使用随机效应模型估计真菌毒素的总流行率和浓度,同时通过蒙特卡罗模拟进行概率风险评估,计算暴露边际(MOEs)和危害商数(HQ)。鸡蛋中黄曲霉毒素(AFs)的流行率排序为:AFB1 (19%) > AFB2 (12%) > AFG1(10%)≈AFG2(10%)。就平均混合浓度而言,真菌毒素遵循以下顺序:DON(83.93µg/kg) > ZEN(6.00µg/kg) > AFs(5.604µg/kg) > OTA(2.52µg/kg)。蛋清中DON和OTA的含量高于蛋黄,而蛋黄中ZEN的含量高于蛋黄。从公共卫生的角度来看,风险评估显示了惊人的暴露水平,特别是在中国、埃及和约旦,这些国家AFB1的moe值明显低于安全阈值(moe < 10,000)。研究发现,由于儿童体重较低和生理系统发育不全,他们的风险更高,中国的moe低至3。此外,HQ的分析表明,DON、OTA和ZEN的风险不可忽视,特别是在中国和波兰,饮食暴露可能导致慢性毒性或内分泌紊乱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Prevalence and Concentration of Mycotoxins (Aflatoxins, Deoxynivalenol, Zearalenone, and Ochratoxin A) in Domestic Bird Eggs: A Global Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Probabilistic Risk Assessment
Mycotoxins, such as aflatoxins (AFs), deoxynivalenol (DON), zearalenone (ZEN), and ochratoxin A (OTA), present significant health risks due to their carcinogenic and toxic properties. This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the global prevalence, concentration, and associated health risks of mycotoxins in domestic bird eggs. Following the PRISMA guideline, a comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2005–2024). Thirteen studies, encompassing 8,410 egg samples, were analyzed. The pooled prevalence and concentration of mycotoxins were estimated using random-effects models, while probabilistic risk assessment was performed via Monte Carlo simulation, calculating the Margin of Exposure (MOEs) and Hazard Quotient (HQ). The prevalence ranking of aflatoxins (AFs) in eggs was as follows: AFB1 (19%) > AFB2 (12%) > AFG1 (10%) ≈ AFG2 (10%). In terms of mean pooled concentration, mycotoxins followed this order: DON (83.93 µg/kg) > ZEN (6.00 µg/kg) > AFs (5.604 µg/kg) > OTA (2.52 µg/kg). Concentrations of DON and OTA were higher in egg white than in yolk, whereas ZEN levels were higher in yolk. From a public health perspective, risk assessment revealed alarming exposure levels, particularly in China, Egypt, and Jordan, where MOE values for AFB1 were significantly below the safety threshold (MOEs < 10,000). Children were found to be at heightened risk due to their lower body weight and developing physiological systems, with MOEs as low as 3 in China. Additionally, HQ analyses indicated nonnegligible risks from DON, OTA, and ZEN, particularly in China and Poland, where dietary exposure may contribute to chronic toxicity or endocrine disruption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信