精神药物的抗胆碱能等效性:精神科医生指南。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Nicolas Badre, Eric Geier
{"title":"精神药物的抗胆碱能等效性:精神科医生指南。","authors":"Nicolas Badre, Eric Geier","doi":"10.1097/JCP.0000000000002073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anticholinergic side effects from psychotropic medications are common and can lead to significant adverse events, including cognitive impairment and falls, particularly in vulnerable populations like the elderly. The cumulative anticholinergic burden from multiple medications is a critical concern associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Quantifying this burden is essential for safer prescribing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article developed an anticholinergic equivalence (AE) table for various psychotropic medications. Diphenhydramine (AE=1) was used as the reference standard. AE values for other drugs were derived from their M1 muscarinic receptor binding affinities (Ki) relative to diphenhydramine. This allows estimation of the diphenhydramine equivalent burden per milligram of a given medication. Antihistaminic properties were also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An AE table was generated, detailing the anticholinergic potency of numerous psychotropic agents. Values varied significantly, with older tricyclic antidepressants (eg, amitriptyline AE: 8.99) and some antipsychotics (eg, clozapine AE: 6.67, olanzapine AE: 3.08) showing high anticholinergic equivalence. Many sedating medications (eg, quetiapine, mirtazapine) are noted to have potent antihistaminic but low anticholinergic properties, clarifying that sedation is not always due to anticholinergic effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The anticholinergic equivalence table provides a practical, pharmacologically based tool for psychiatrists to quantify and compare the anticholinergic potential of psychotropic medications. This can aid in minimizing cumulative anticholinergic burden, making more informed prescribing decisions, and ultimately enhancing patient safety and therapeutic outcomes, especially in high-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":15455,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anticholinergic Equivalence in Psychotropic Medications: A Guide for Psychiatrists.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Badre, Eric Geier\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JCP.0000000000002073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anticholinergic side effects from psychotropic medications are common and can lead to significant adverse events, including cognitive impairment and falls, particularly in vulnerable populations like the elderly. The cumulative anticholinergic burden from multiple medications is a critical concern associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Quantifying this burden is essential for safer prescribing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This article developed an anticholinergic equivalence (AE) table for various psychotropic medications. Diphenhydramine (AE=1) was used as the reference standard. AE values for other drugs were derived from their M1 muscarinic receptor binding affinities (Ki) relative to diphenhydramine. This allows estimation of the diphenhydramine equivalent burden per milligram of a given medication. Antihistaminic properties were also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An AE table was generated, detailing the anticholinergic potency of numerous psychotropic agents. Values varied significantly, with older tricyclic antidepressants (eg, amitriptyline AE: 8.99) and some antipsychotics (eg, clozapine AE: 6.67, olanzapine AE: 3.08) showing high anticholinergic equivalence. Many sedating medications (eg, quetiapine, mirtazapine) are noted to have potent antihistaminic but low anticholinergic properties, clarifying that sedation is not always due to anticholinergic effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The anticholinergic equivalence table provides a practical, pharmacologically based tool for psychiatrists to quantify and compare the anticholinergic potential of psychotropic medications. This can aid in minimizing cumulative anticholinergic burden, making more informed prescribing decisions, and ultimately enhancing patient safety and therapeutic outcomes, especially in high-risk groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000002073\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCP.0000000000002073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:精神药物的抗胆碱能副作用很常见,可导致严重的不良事件,包括认知障碍和跌倒,特别是在老年人等弱势人群中。多种药物累积的抗胆碱能负担是一个与较差临床结果相关的关键问题。量化这一负担对于更安全的处方至关重要。方法:建立各种精神药物的抗胆碱能等效量(AE)表。以苯海拉明(AE=1)为标准品。其他药物的AE值来源于它们与苯海拉明的M1毒蕈碱受体结合亲和力(Ki)。这样就可以估计出每毫克给定药物的苯海拉明当量负担。抗组胺药的性能也进行了综述。结果:生成了AE表,详细描述了多种精神药物的抗胆碱能效力。数值差异显著,较老的三环类抗抑郁药(如阿米替林AE: 8.99)和一些抗精神病药(如氯氮平AE: 6.67,奥氮平AE: 3.08)显示出较高的抗胆碱能等效性。许多镇静药物(如喹硫平、米氮平)被认为具有有效的抗组胺作用,但抗胆碱能作用较低,这说明镇静并不总是由于抗胆碱能作用。结论:抗胆碱能等效表为精神科医生量化和比较精神药物的抗胆碱能潜能提供了一个实用的、基于药理学的工具。这有助于减少累积抗胆碱能负担,做出更明智的处方决定,并最终提高患者安全性和治疗效果,特别是在高危人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anticholinergic Equivalence in Psychotropic Medications: A Guide for Psychiatrists.

Background: Anticholinergic side effects from psychotropic medications are common and can lead to significant adverse events, including cognitive impairment and falls, particularly in vulnerable populations like the elderly. The cumulative anticholinergic burden from multiple medications is a critical concern associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Quantifying this burden is essential for safer prescribing.

Methods: This article developed an anticholinergic equivalence (AE) table for various psychotropic medications. Diphenhydramine (AE=1) was used as the reference standard. AE values for other drugs were derived from their M1 muscarinic receptor binding affinities (Ki) relative to diphenhydramine. This allows estimation of the diphenhydramine equivalent burden per milligram of a given medication. Antihistaminic properties were also reviewed.

Results: An AE table was generated, detailing the anticholinergic potency of numerous psychotropic agents. Values varied significantly, with older tricyclic antidepressants (eg, amitriptyline AE: 8.99) and some antipsychotics (eg, clozapine AE: 6.67, olanzapine AE: 3.08) showing high anticholinergic equivalence. Many sedating medications (eg, quetiapine, mirtazapine) are noted to have potent antihistaminic but low anticholinergic properties, clarifying that sedation is not always due to anticholinergic effects.

Conclusions: The anticholinergic equivalence table provides a practical, pharmacologically based tool for psychiatrists to quantify and compare the anticholinergic potential of psychotropic medications. This can aid in minimizing cumulative anticholinergic burden, making more informed prescribing decisions, and ultimately enhancing patient safety and therapeutic outcomes, especially in high-risk groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, a leading publication in psychopharmacology, offers a wide range of articles reporting on clinical trials and studies, side effects, drug interactions, overdose management, pharmacogenetics, pharmacokinetics, and psychiatric effects of non-psychiatric drugs. The journal keeps clinician-scientists and trainees up-to-date on the latest clinical developments in psychopharmacologic agents, presenting the extensive coverage needed to keep up with every development in this fast-growing field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信