不同自粘修复系统在V类腔中的微渗漏评价及微形态分析:实验室研究。

Q2 Dentistry
Mohamed E Hamouda, Youniss S Harp, Abeer E Elembaby
{"title":"不同自粘修复系统在V类腔中的微渗漏评价及微形态分析:实验室研究。","authors":"Mohamed E Hamouda, Youniss S Harp, Abeer E Elembaby","doi":"10.4317/jced.62843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microleakage is a common problem that affects the longevity of restorative materials in Class V cavities. It is influenced by factors such as the type of restorative materials, composition of the cavity margins and aging. This study aimed to evaluate and compare microleakage and micromorphological analysis of restoration-dentin interface for Class V cavities restored with resin modified glass ionomer cement, self-adhesive flowable composite and self-adhesive composite hybrid before and after thermocycling for 10000 cycles.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>One hundred two sound premolars received standardized Class V cavities on their buccal surfaces with the gingival margin placed 1mm above the cementum-enamel junction. The prepared premolars were randomly divided into three groups according to the self-adhesive restorative systems used (n=34). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to aging (n=17); the first one was immediately evaluated after 24 hours of restoration placement, while the second was evaluated after thermocycling. Restored premolars were evaluated using dye penetration microleakage test under a stereomicroscope and micromorphological analysis of restorations/dentin interface. Microleakage scores were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference regarding microleakage between the used self-adhesive restorative systems (<i>p</i><0.05). Self-adhesive composite hybrid had the highest microleakage scores followed by self-adhesive flowable composite while resin modified glass ionomer cement had the lowest microleakage scores. Also, there was a significant increase in the microleakage scores for the used restorative systems after thermocycling (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resin modified glass ionomer cement remains the material of choice for Class V cavities in the term of microleakage compared to self-adhesive flowable composite and self-adhesive composite hybrid. The sealing stability of the used self-adhesive restorative systems still questionable over time. <b>Key words:</b>Class V cavities, microleakage, resin modified glass ionomer cement, self-adhesive composite, thermocycling.</p>","PeriodicalId":15376,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","volume":"17 7","pages":"e805-e815"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357500/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Microleakage and Micromorphological Analysis of Different Self-Adhesive Restorative Systems in Class V Cavities: Laboratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed E Hamouda, Youniss S Harp, Abeer E Elembaby\",\"doi\":\"10.4317/jced.62843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microleakage is a common problem that affects the longevity of restorative materials in Class V cavities. It is influenced by factors such as the type of restorative materials, composition of the cavity margins and aging. This study aimed to evaluate and compare microleakage and micromorphological analysis of restoration-dentin interface for Class V cavities restored with resin modified glass ionomer cement, self-adhesive flowable composite and self-adhesive composite hybrid before and after thermocycling for 10000 cycles.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>One hundred two sound premolars received standardized Class V cavities on their buccal surfaces with the gingival margin placed 1mm above the cementum-enamel junction. The prepared premolars were randomly divided into three groups according to the self-adhesive restorative systems used (n=34). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to aging (n=17); the first one was immediately evaluated after 24 hours of restoration placement, while the second was evaluated after thermocycling. Restored premolars were evaluated using dye penetration microleakage test under a stereomicroscope and micromorphological analysis of restorations/dentin interface. Microleakage scores were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference regarding microleakage between the used self-adhesive restorative systems (<i>p</i><0.05). Self-adhesive composite hybrid had the highest microleakage scores followed by self-adhesive flowable composite while resin modified glass ionomer cement had the lowest microleakage scores. Also, there was a significant increase in the microleakage scores for the used restorative systems after thermocycling (<i>p</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resin modified glass ionomer cement remains the material of choice for Class V cavities in the term of microleakage compared to self-adhesive flowable composite and self-adhesive composite hybrid. The sealing stability of the used self-adhesive restorative systems still questionable over time. <b>Key words:</b>Class V cavities, microleakage, resin modified glass ionomer cement, self-adhesive composite, thermocycling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"e805-e815\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357500/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.62843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:微渗漏是影响V类腔体修复材料寿命的常见问题。它受修复材料的类型、空腔边缘的组成和老化等因素的影响。本研究旨在评价和比较树脂改性玻璃离子水门合剂、自粘流动复合材料和自粘复合材料复合材料修复的V类牙本质腔在热循环10000次前后的微渗漏和微形态分析。材料和方法:在120颗健康的前磨牙的颊面放置标准化的V级蛀牙,龈缘放置在牙骨质-牙釉质交界处上方1mm处。根据所使用的自粘修复系统将制备好的前磨牙随机分为3组(n=34)。每组按年龄再细分为2个亚组(n=17);第一个在修复体放置24小时后立即评估,而第二个在热循环后评估。采用体视显微镜下染料渗透微渗漏试验和修复体/牙本质界面显微形态学分析对修复的前磨牙进行评价。微泄漏评分采用Kruskal-Wallis检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和Wilcoxon sign Rank检验进行统计分析。结果:使用的自粘修复体系在微渗漏方面存在统计学差异(ppp)。结论:与自粘流动复合材料和自粘复合复合材料相比,树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥在微渗漏方面仍然是V类腔的首选材料。随着时间的推移,使用的自粘修复系统的密封稳定性仍然值得怀疑。关键词:V类空腔,微漏,树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥,自粘复合材料,热循环
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Microleakage and Micromorphological Analysis of Different Self-Adhesive Restorative Systems in Class V Cavities: Laboratory Study.

Background: Microleakage is a common problem that affects the longevity of restorative materials in Class V cavities. It is influenced by factors such as the type of restorative materials, composition of the cavity margins and aging. This study aimed to evaluate and compare microleakage and micromorphological analysis of restoration-dentin interface for Class V cavities restored with resin modified glass ionomer cement, self-adhesive flowable composite and self-adhesive composite hybrid before and after thermocycling for 10000 cycles.

Material and methods: One hundred two sound premolars received standardized Class V cavities on their buccal surfaces with the gingival margin placed 1mm above the cementum-enamel junction. The prepared premolars were randomly divided into three groups according to the self-adhesive restorative systems used (n=34). Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to aging (n=17); the first one was immediately evaluated after 24 hours of restoration placement, while the second was evaluated after thermocycling. Restored premolars were evaluated using dye penetration microleakage test under a stereomicroscope and micromorphological analysis of restorations/dentin interface. Microleakage scores were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference regarding microleakage between the used self-adhesive restorative systems (p<0.05). Self-adhesive composite hybrid had the highest microleakage scores followed by self-adhesive flowable composite while resin modified glass ionomer cement had the lowest microleakage scores. Also, there was a significant increase in the microleakage scores for the used restorative systems after thermocycling (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Resin modified glass ionomer cement remains the material of choice for Class V cavities in the term of microleakage compared to self-adhesive flowable composite and self-adhesive composite hybrid. The sealing stability of the used self-adhesive restorative systems still questionable over time. Key words:Class V cavities, microleakage, resin modified glass ionomer cement, self-adhesive composite, thermocycling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Indexed in PUBMED, PubMed Central® (PMC) since 2012 and SCOPUSJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is an Open Access (free access on-line) - http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm. The aim of the Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry is: - Periodontology - Community and Preventive Dentistry - Esthetic Dentistry - Biomaterials and Bioengineering in Dentistry - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics - Prosthetic Dentistry - Orthodontics - Oral Medicine and Pathology - Odontostomatology for the disabled or special patients - Oral Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信