假体周围关节感染的负担:患者报告的结果和假体周围关节感染的定性见解。

IF 2.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2025-08-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-10-277-2025
Franz-Joseph Dally, Frido Kixmöller, Frederic Bludau, Sascha Gravius, Ali Darwich, Marcel Betsch
{"title":"假体周围关节感染的负担:患者报告的结果和假体周围关节感染的定性见解。","authors":"Franz-Joseph Dally, Frido Kixmöller, Frederic Bludau, Sascha Gravius, Ali Darwich, Marcel Betsch","doi":"10.5194/jbji-10-277-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) have a severe physical impact and impose a significant psychological burden. This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and qualitative interview data within the same study cohort. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 28 PJI patients were identified after completing treatment for hip or knee PJIs. Qualitative interviews were conducted, and PROMs - such as the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), hospital anxiety and depression scale - total (HADS-T) score, and brief pain inventory (BPI) score - were assessed. The data were then evaluated for correlations between the PROMs and the qualitative interview findings. <b>Results</b>: A total of 20 out of 28 (71.4 %) patients scored above the accepted threshold of  <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo> <mn>10</mn></mrow> </math> on the HADS-T. A total of 8 out of 28 (28.6 %) patients scored low on the HADS-T. Through semi-structured interviews, we further evaluated the two groups: a high-HADS-T-scoring group and a low-HADS-T-scoring group. PJI patients scoring high on the HADS-T experienced a heavier psychological burden than those scoring low on the HADS-T. Our qualitative data show that the high-HADS-T-scoring group perceived their PJI experience as troubling and psychologically distressing; moreover patients in the high-HADS-T-scoring group did not deal with the PJI as well as those in the low-HADS-T-scoring group. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study provides valuable information regarding the screening of PJI patients who are at risk of psychological disorders using the HADS-T. Following screening, it also provides insight into which patients should be closely monitored and which patients should be offered professional psychological support, as the latter resource is limited and needs to be distributed sensibly. PJI patients scoring above  <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo> <mn>10</mn></mrow> </math> on the HADS-T are high-risk patients and should be offered professional psychological support.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"10 4","pages":"277-284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The burden of periprosthetic joint infections: patient-reported outcomes and qualitative insights into periprosthetic joint infections.\",\"authors\":\"Franz-Joseph Dally, Frido Kixmöller, Frederic Bludau, Sascha Gravius, Ali Darwich, Marcel Betsch\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/jbji-10-277-2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) have a severe physical impact and impose a significant psychological burden. This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and qualitative interview data within the same study cohort. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 28 PJI patients were identified after completing treatment for hip or knee PJIs. Qualitative interviews were conducted, and PROMs - such as the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), hospital anxiety and depression scale - total (HADS-T) score, and brief pain inventory (BPI) score - were assessed. The data were then evaluated for correlations between the PROMs and the qualitative interview findings. <b>Results</b>: A total of 20 out of 28 (71.4 %) patients scored above the accepted threshold of  <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo> <mn>10</mn></mrow> </math> on the HADS-T. A total of 8 out of 28 (28.6 %) patients scored low on the HADS-T. Through semi-structured interviews, we further evaluated the two groups: a high-HADS-T-scoring group and a low-HADS-T-scoring group. PJI patients scoring high on the HADS-T experienced a heavier psychological burden than those scoring low on the HADS-T. Our qualitative data show that the high-HADS-T-scoring group perceived their PJI experience as troubling and psychologically distressing; moreover patients in the high-HADS-T-scoring group did not deal with the PJI as well as those in the low-HADS-T-scoring group. <b>Conclusions</b>: This study provides valuable information regarding the screening of PJI patients who are at risk of psychological disorders using the HADS-T. Following screening, it also provides insight into which patients should be closely monitored and which patients should be offered professional psychological support, as the latter resource is limited and needs to be distributed sensibly. PJI patients scoring above  <math><mrow><mo>≥</mo> <mn>10</mn></mrow> </math> on the HADS-T are high-risk patients and should be offered professional psychological support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"277-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12356111/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-277-2025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-10-277-2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前言:假体周围关节感染(PJIs)具有严重的身体影响,并造成显著的心理负担。本研究旨在比较同一研究队列中患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和定性访谈数据。方法:共28例PJI患者在完成髋关节或膝关节PJI治疗后被确定。进行定性访谈,并评估PROMs -如髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(HOOS),膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(oos),医院焦虑和抑郁量表-总分(HADS-T)评分和短暂疼痛量表(BPI)评分。然后评估数据在prom和定性访谈结果之间的相关性。结果:28例患者中有20例(71.4%)的HADS-T评分高于≥10的可接受阈值。28例患者中有8例(28.6%)的HADS-T评分较低。通过半结构化访谈,我们进一步评估了两组:高hads - t评分组和低hads - t评分组。在HADS-T上得分高的PJI患者比在HADS-T上得分低的患者经历了更重的心理负担。我们的定性数据显示,高hads - t得分组认为他们的PJI经历令人不安和心理痛苦;此外,高hads - t评分组患者的PJI处理不如低hads - t评分组患者。结论:本研究为使用HADS-T筛查有心理障碍风险的PJI患者提供了有价值的信息。筛查后,还可以了解哪些患者应该密切监测,哪些患者应该提供专业的心理支持,因为后者的资源是有限的,需要合理分配。PJI患者HADS-T评分≥10分为高危患者,应给予专业心理支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The burden of periprosthetic joint infections: patient-reported outcomes and qualitative insights into periprosthetic joint infections.

The burden of periprosthetic joint infections: patient-reported outcomes and qualitative insights into periprosthetic joint infections.

The burden of periprosthetic joint infections: patient-reported outcomes and qualitative insights into periprosthetic joint infections.

The burden of periprosthetic joint infections: patient-reported outcomes and qualitative insights into periprosthetic joint infections.

Introduction: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) have a severe physical impact and impose a significant psychological burden. This study aimed to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and qualitative interview data within the same study cohort. Methods: A total of 28 PJI patients were identified after completing treatment for hip or knee PJIs. Qualitative interviews were conducted, and PROMs - such as the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), hospital anxiety and depression scale - total (HADS-T) score, and brief pain inventory (BPI) score - were assessed. The data were then evaluated for correlations between the PROMs and the qualitative interview findings. Results: A total of 20 out of 28 (71.4 %) patients scored above the accepted threshold of  10 on the HADS-T. A total of 8 out of 28 (28.6 %) patients scored low on the HADS-T. Through semi-structured interviews, we further evaluated the two groups: a high-HADS-T-scoring group and a low-HADS-T-scoring group. PJI patients scoring high on the HADS-T experienced a heavier psychological burden than those scoring low on the HADS-T. Our qualitative data show that the high-HADS-T-scoring group perceived their PJI experience as troubling and psychologically distressing; moreover patients in the high-HADS-T-scoring group did not deal with the PJI as well as those in the low-HADS-T-scoring group. Conclusions: This study provides valuable information regarding the screening of PJI patients who are at risk of psychological disorders using the HADS-T. Following screening, it also provides insight into which patients should be closely monitored and which patients should be offered professional psychological support, as the latter resource is limited and needs to be distributed sensibly. PJI patients scoring above  10 on the HADS-T are high-risk patients and should be offered professional psychological support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信