时间生态位划分:通过优先效应共存或竞争排斥的机制?

IF 3.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Heng-Xing Zou
{"title":"时间生态位划分:通过优先效应共存或竞争排斥的机制?","authors":"Heng-Xing Zou","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Research Highlight:</b> Ekrem R., de Vries, C., Kaiser, T., &amp; Kokko, H. (2025). Temporal niche differentiation often leads to priority effects rather than coexistence: Lessons from a marine midge. <i>Journal of Animal Ecology</i>, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70094. Temporal niche partitioning has always been hypothesized as a key mechanism in maintaining species coexistence. By utilizing resources or habitats at different times, each species will occupy distinct ‘temporal niches’, thereby reducing overlap in resource use and the potential for competitive exclusion. However, to what extent temporal niche partitioning can explain coexistence remains contested, as increasing theoretical and experimental evidence finds weak contributions of such temporal mechanisms to community dynamics. In a recent study, Ekrem et al. (2025) shed new light on this debate by studying the complex life history of coexisting strains of the marine midge, <i>Clunio marinus</i>. Using mathematical models based on empirical processes, they found that the temporal differentiation of breeding phenology between strains does not always lead to coexistence. Instead, the first strain that emerges and breeds will benefit from a positive frequency dependence, leading to priority effects that promote the exclusion of other strains. These results highlight the nuanced role of temporal niche partitioning and related mechanisms in contributing to coexistence, emphasizing the importance of system-specific knowledge in considering the consequences of temporal differentiations in resource and habitat use.</p>","PeriodicalId":14934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Ecology","volume":"94 10","pages":"1896-1899"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal niche partitioning: Mechanism of coexistence or competitive exclusion via priority effects?\",\"authors\":\"Heng-Xing Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1365-2656.70115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Research Highlight:</b> Ekrem R., de Vries, C., Kaiser, T., &amp; Kokko, H. (2025). Temporal niche differentiation often leads to priority effects rather than coexistence: Lessons from a marine midge. <i>Journal of Animal Ecology</i>, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70094. Temporal niche partitioning has always been hypothesized as a key mechanism in maintaining species coexistence. By utilizing resources or habitats at different times, each species will occupy distinct ‘temporal niches’, thereby reducing overlap in resource use and the potential for competitive exclusion. However, to what extent temporal niche partitioning can explain coexistence remains contested, as increasing theoretical and experimental evidence finds weak contributions of such temporal mechanisms to community dynamics. In a recent study, Ekrem et al. (2025) shed new light on this debate by studying the complex life history of coexisting strains of the marine midge, <i>Clunio marinus</i>. Using mathematical models based on empirical processes, they found that the temporal differentiation of breeding phenology between strains does not always lead to coexistence. Instead, the first strain that emerges and breeds will benefit from a positive frequency dependence, leading to priority effects that promote the exclusion of other strains. These results highlight the nuanced role of temporal niche partitioning and related mechanisms in contributing to coexistence, emphasizing the importance of system-specific knowledge in considering the consequences of temporal differentiations in resource and habitat use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Animal Ecology\",\"volume\":\"94 10\",\"pages\":\"1896-1899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Animal Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.70115\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2656.70115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究重点:Ekrem R., de Vries, C., Kaiser, T., & Kokko, H.(2025)。时间生态位分化往往导致优先效应,而不是共存:来自海洋蠓的教训。动物生态学杂志,https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70094。时间生态位划分一直被认为是维持物种共存的关键机制。通过在不同时间利用资源或栖息地,每个物种将占据不同的“时间生态位”,从而减少资源利用的重叠和竞争排斥的可能性。然而,随着越来越多的理论和实验证据发现这种时间机制对群落动态的贡献微弱,时间生态位划分在多大程度上可以解释共存仍然存在争议。在最近的一项研究中,Ekrem等人(2025)通过研究海洋蠓(Clunio marinus)共存菌株的复杂生活史,为这一争论提供了新的视角。利用基于经验过程的数学模型,他们发现菌株之间繁殖物候的时间差异并不总是导致共存。相反,出现和繁殖的第一个菌株将受益于积极的频率依赖,导致优先效应,促进排斥其他菌株。这些结果强调了时间生态位划分和相关机制在促进共存中的微妙作用,强调了系统特定知识在考虑资源和栖息地利用时间差异的后果时的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Temporal niche partitioning: Mechanism of coexistence or competitive exclusion via priority effects?

Temporal niche partitioning: Mechanism of coexistence or competitive exclusion via priority effects?

Research Highlight: Ekrem R., de Vries, C., Kaiser, T., & Kokko, H. (2025). Temporal niche differentiation often leads to priority effects rather than coexistence: Lessons from a marine midge. Journal of Animal Ecology, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70094. Temporal niche partitioning has always been hypothesized as a key mechanism in maintaining species coexistence. By utilizing resources or habitats at different times, each species will occupy distinct ‘temporal niches’, thereby reducing overlap in resource use and the potential for competitive exclusion. However, to what extent temporal niche partitioning can explain coexistence remains contested, as increasing theoretical and experimental evidence finds weak contributions of such temporal mechanisms to community dynamics. In a recent study, Ekrem et al. (2025) shed new light on this debate by studying the complex life history of coexisting strains of the marine midge, Clunio marinus. Using mathematical models based on empirical processes, they found that the temporal differentiation of breeding phenology between strains does not always lead to coexistence. Instead, the first strain that emerges and breeds will benefit from a positive frequency dependence, leading to priority effects that promote the exclusion of other strains. These results highlight the nuanced role of temporal niche partitioning and related mechanisms in contributing to coexistence, emphasizing the importance of system-specific knowledge in considering the consequences of temporal differentiations in resource and habitat use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Ecology
Journal of Animal Ecology 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
188
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Ecology publishes the best original research on all aspects of animal ecology, ranging from the molecular to the ecosystem level. These may be field, laboratory and theoretical studies utilising terrestrial, freshwater or marine systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信