巴西肾脏学会关于拒绝和停止透析的立场声明。

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Dirceu Reis da Silva, Fernanda Salomão Gorayeb-Polacchini, Ana Flávia Moura, Cibele Isaac Saad Rodrigues, Maurício Younes-Ibrahim, Eduardo Rocha, Marina Aline Occhiena de Oliveira Neiva, Pedro Túlio Rocha, Patrícia Ferreira Abreu, José A Moura-Neto
{"title":"巴西肾脏学会关于拒绝和停止透析的立场声明。","authors":"Dirceu Reis da Silva, Fernanda Salomão Gorayeb-Polacchini, Ana Flávia Moura, Cibele Isaac Saad Rodrigues, Maurício Younes-Ibrahim, Eduardo Rocha, Marina Aline Occhiena de Oliveira Neiva, Pedro Túlio Rocha, Patrícia Ferreira Abreu, José A Moura-Neto","doi":"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2025-0057en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Renal failure is considered a life-limiting CONDITION that often requires Renal Replacement Therapy, such as dialysis or kidney transplantation. Dialysis can effectively relieve symptoms and prolong life, but its withdrawal results in severe complications and death. The decision to discontinue or refuse to dialysis must be made collaboratively by the patient, family, and healthcare team, considering the clinical condition, life expectancy, symptom burden, and individual preferences. This decision, involving clinical, bioethical, and legal aspects, is complex and requires a collective understanding of the process. Withdrawal to dialysis presents a challenge for nephrologists and the healthcare team due to the lack of clear guidelines, which can compromis the safety of the process and the patient's dignity. In this position statement, the Brazilian Society of Nephrology recommends a process for dialysis withdrawal or refusal, including identifying eligible patients, applying prognostic assessment tools, shared decision-making, advance care planning, and offering dialysis alternatives. The decision must be consensual, allowing adequate time for reflection, and healthcare services must provide comprehensive management of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual symptoms, as well as end-of-life care. Proper documentation in medical records is essential to ensure process transparency. Therefore, refusal or withdrawal to dialysis should be an informed decision that respects individual autonomy and balances clinical, bioethical, spiritual, and legal considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":14724,"journal":{"name":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","volume":"47 3","pages":"e20250057"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dirceu Reis da Silva, Fernanda Salomão Gorayeb-Polacchini, Ana Flávia Moura, Cibele Isaac Saad Rodrigues, Maurício Younes-Ibrahim, Eduardo Rocha, Marina Aline Occhiena de Oliveira Neiva, Pedro Túlio Rocha, Patrícia Ferreira Abreu, José A Moura-Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2025-0057en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Renal failure is considered a life-limiting CONDITION that often requires Renal Replacement Therapy, such as dialysis or kidney transplantation. Dialysis can effectively relieve symptoms and prolong life, but its withdrawal results in severe complications and death. The decision to discontinue or refuse to dialysis must be made collaboratively by the patient, family, and healthcare team, considering the clinical condition, life expectancy, symptom burden, and individual preferences. This decision, involving clinical, bioethical, and legal aspects, is complex and requires a collective understanding of the process. Withdrawal to dialysis presents a challenge for nephrologists and the healthcare team due to the lack of clear guidelines, which can compromis the safety of the process and the patient's dignity. In this position statement, the Brazilian Society of Nephrology recommends a process for dialysis withdrawal or refusal, including identifying eligible patients, applying prognostic assessment tools, shared decision-making, advance care planning, and offering dialysis alternatives. The decision must be consensual, allowing adequate time for reflection, and healthcare services must provide comprehensive management of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual symptoms, as well as end-of-life care. Proper documentation in medical records is essential to ensure process transparency. Therefore, refusal or withdrawal to dialysis should be an informed decision that respects individual autonomy and balances clinical, bioethical, spiritual, and legal considerations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia\",\"volume\":\"47 3\",\"pages\":\"e20250057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12360398/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2025-0057en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia : 'orgao oficial de Sociedades Brasileira e Latino-Americana de Nefrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2025-0057en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肾功能衰竭被认为是一种限制生命的疾病,通常需要肾脏替代疗法,如透析或肾移植。透析可以有效缓解症状,延长生命,但停止透析会导致严重的并发症和死亡。停止或拒绝透析的决定必须由患者、家庭和医疗团队共同做出,考虑到临床状况、预期寿命、症状负担和个人偏好。这一决定涉及临床、生物伦理和法律方面,是复杂的,需要集体理解这一过程。由于缺乏明确的指导方针,退出透析对肾病学家和医疗团队来说是一个挑战,这可能会损害透析过程的安全性和患者的尊严。在这一立场声明中,巴西肾脏学会推荐透析退出或拒绝的流程,包括确定符合条件的患者,应用预后评估工具,共同决策,提前护理计划,并提供透析替代方案。决定必须是双方同意的,允许有充分的时间进行反思,医疗保健服务必须提供对身体、心理、社会和精神症状的全面管理,以及临终关怀。医疗记录中适当的文件对于确保流程透明度至关重要。因此,拒绝或退出透析应该是一个明智的决定,尊重个人的自主权和平衡临床,生物伦理,精神和法律方面的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis.

Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis.

Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis.

Position statement of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology on the refusal and discontinuation of dialysis.

Renal failure is considered a life-limiting CONDITION that often requires Renal Replacement Therapy, such as dialysis or kidney transplantation. Dialysis can effectively relieve symptoms and prolong life, but its withdrawal results in severe complications and death. The decision to discontinue or refuse to dialysis must be made collaboratively by the patient, family, and healthcare team, considering the clinical condition, life expectancy, symptom burden, and individual preferences. This decision, involving clinical, bioethical, and legal aspects, is complex and requires a collective understanding of the process. Withdrawal to dialysis presents a challenge for nephrologists and the healthcare team due to the lack of clear guidelines, which can compromis the safety of the process and the patient's dignity. In this position statement, the Brazilian Society of Nephrology recommends a process for dialysis withdrawal or refusal, including identifying eligible patients, applying prognostic assessment tools, shared decision-making, advance care planning, and offering dialysis alternatives. The decision must be consensual, allowing adequate time for reflection, and healthcare services must provide comprehensive management of physical, psychological, social, and spiritual symptoms, as well as end-of-life care. Proper documentation in medical records is essential to ensure process transparency. Therefore, refusal or withdrawal to dialysis should be an informed decision that respects individual autonomy and balances clinical, bioethical, spiritual, and legal considerations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
208
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信