W Body, S Steckle, A Haggerty, M Putt, F Coyer, E M Milford
{"title":"急性肺血栓栓塞的非机械性血流动力学支持:范围回顾。","authors":"W Body, S Steckle, A Haggerty, M Putt, F Coyer, E M Milford","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00793-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) may require haemodynamic supportive therapies while appropriate therapies for clot burden reduction are pursued. This scoping review aims to identify the non-mechanical haemodynamic support interventions that have been investigated for the management of acute PE, and to map the available evidence for each intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An iterative search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library was performed to map all available animal studies, case-series, observational studies, human trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses that investigate any non-mechanical haemodynamic support in acute PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6,362 unique articles were screened and of the 132 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 98 were animal studies, 31 human studies, and 3 were systematic reviews. Among all studies 57 different agents were found, including 16 among the human studies. 6 agents were investigated across 7 human randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and included inhaled nitric oxide, fluid, furosemide, diclofenac, sildenafil, and epoprostenol, but were limited to intermediate-risk PE and none demonstrated a mortality benefit from the intervention tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence to guide clinical practice in the non-mechanical haemodynamic support of PE is severely limited. However, there are numerous candidate agents that could be further investigated. The high-risk group are an understudied population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-mechanical haemodynamic support in acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"W Body, S Steckle, A Haggerty, M Putt, F Coyer, E M Milford\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40635-025-00793-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) may require haemodynamic supportive therapies while appropriate therapies for clot burden reduction are pursued. This scoping review aims to identify the non-mechanical haemodynamic support interventions that have been investigated for the management of acute PE, and to map the available evidence for each intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An iterative search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library was performed to map all available animal studies, case-series, observational studies, human trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses that investigate any non-mechanical haemodynamic support in acute PE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>6,362 unique articles were screened and of the 132 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 98 were animal studies, 31 human studies, and 3 were systematic reviews. Among all studies 57 different agents were found, including 16 among the human studies. 6 agents were investigated across 7 human randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and included inhaled nitric oxide, fluid, furosemide, diclofenac, sildenafil, and epoprostenol, but were limited to intermediate-risk PE and none demonstrated a mortality benefit from the intervention tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evidence to guide clinical practice in the non-mechanical haemodynamic support of PE is severely limited. However, there are numerous candidate agents that could be further investigated. The high-risk group are an understudied population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00793-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00793-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-mechanical haemodynamic support in acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a scoping review.
Background and aims: Acute pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) may require haemodynamic supportive therapies while appropriate therapies for clot burden reduction are pursued. This scoping review aims to identify the non-mechanical haemodynamic support interventions that have been investigated for the management of acute PE, and to map the available evidence for each intervention.
Methods: An iterative search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library was performed to map all available animal studies, case-series, observational studies, human trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses that investigate any non-mechanical haemodynamic support in acute PE.
Results: 6,362 unique articles were screened and of the 132 studies that met the eligibility criteria, 98 were animal studies, 31 human studies, and 3 were systematic reviews. Among all studies 57 different agents were found, including 16 among the human studies. 6 agents were investigated across 7 human randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and included inhaled nitric oxide, fluid, furosemide, diclofenac, sildenafil, and epoprostenol, but were limited to intermediate-risk PE and none demonstrated a mortality benefit from the intervention tested.
Conclusion: The evidence to guide clinical practice in the non-mechanical haemodynamic support of PE is severely limited. However, there are numerous candidate agents that could be further investigated. The high-risk group are an understudied population.