髋关节棘下撞击的关节镜治疗:中期的真正临床改善?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jorge Martin-Lozoya, Miguel Cañones-Martin, Javier Sanz-Reig, Mohamed Sadiq, Jesús Mas-Martinez, Marc Tey-Pons, Ricardo Larrainzar Garijo, Oliver Marín-Peña
{"title":"髋关节棘下撞击的关节镜治疗:中期的真正临床改善?","authors":"Jorge Martin-Lozoya, Miguel Cañones-Martin, Javier Sanz-Reig, Mohamed Sadiq, Jesús Mas-Martinez, Marc Tey-Pons, Ricardo Larrainzar Garijo, Oliver Marín-Peña","doi":"10.1177/11207000251360663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a limited literature available describing the various diagnostic modalities and treatment options for the management of subspine impingement (SSI). We developed a study to evaluate the clinical improvement at 1 year and 5 years, with iHOT 33 and HOS hip scores.</p><p><strong>Questions: </strong>(1) Do patients with subspine compression improve with arthroscopic treatment clinically at short-term follow-up (1 year); (2) Is the improvement maintained in the mid-term (5 years)?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>43 young patients (21-65 years) with subspine compression (prominent anterior inferior iliac spine) treated arthroscopically between January 2010 and December 2021 were included. Patients completed the iHOT33, HOS-SPORT and HOS-ADL questionnaires before surgery, 1 year and 5 years follow-up. We evaluated pre- and postoperative differences at 1 year and at 5 years. Minimum clinically significant difference (MCID) and the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were used to establish clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 37.38 years and 66% were males. Almost 75% and 70% of our patients exceed the MCID and the SCB respectively in all the questionnaires after 1 year follow-up. However, at 5 years follow-up, nearly 70% and 65% of the patients exceeded MCID and SCB respectively, therefore producing a slight worsening in the medium term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate that arthroscopic treatment of subspine impingement is effective. However, larger sample size and longer follow-up period are necessary to analyse long-term results to demonstrate this treatment as the \"gold standard\".</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"11207000251360663"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthroscopic treatment of hip subspinous impingement: a real clinical improvement in the midterm?\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Martin-Lozoya, Miguel Cañones-Martin, Javier Sanz-Reig, Mohamed Sadiq, Jesús Mas-Martinez, Marc Tey-Pons, Ricardo Larrainzar Garijo, Oliver Marín-Peña\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/11207000251360663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a limited literature available describing the various diagnostic modalities and treatment options for the management of subspine impingement (SSI). We developed a study to evaluate the clinical improvement at 1 year and 5 years, with iHOT 33 and HOS hip scores.</p><p><strong>Questions: </strong>(1) Do patients with subspine compression improve with arthroscopic treatment clinically at short-term follow-up (1 year); (2) Is the improvement maintained in the mid-term (5 years)?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>43 young patients (21-65 years) with subspine compression (prominent anterior inferior iliac spine) treated arthroscopically between January 2010 and December 2021 were included. Patients completed the iHOT33, HOS-SPORT and HOS-ADL questionnaires before surgery, 1 year and 5 years follow-up. We evaluated pre- and postoperative differences at 1 year and at 5 years. Minimum clinically significant difference (MCID) and the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were used to establish clinical improvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 37.38 years and 66% were males. Almost 75% and 70% of our patients exceed the MCID and the SCB respectively in all the questionnaires after 1 year follow-up. However, at 5 years follow-up, nearly 70% and 65% of the patients exceeded MCID and SCB respectively, therefore producing a slight worsening in the medium term.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate that arthroscopic treatment of subspine impingement is effective. However, larger sample size and longer follow-up period are necessary to analyse long-term results to demonstrate this treatment as the \\\"gold standard\\\".</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIP International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"11207000251360663\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIP International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251360663\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000251360663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于脊柱下撞击(SSI)的各种诊断方式和治疗选择的文献有限。我们开展了一项研究,以iHOT 33和HOS髋关节评分评估1年和5年的临床改善情况。问题:(1)短期随访(1年),临床关节镜治疗是否能改善脊柱下压迫;(2)中期(5年)是否能保持改善?方法:纳入2010年1月至2021年12月期间经关节镜治疗的43例脊柱下压迫(突出髂前下棘)年轻患者(21-65岁)。患者术前完成iHOT33、HOS-SPORT和HOS-ADL问卷调查,随访1年和5年。我们评估了术前和术后1年和5年的差异。采用最小临床显著差异(Minimum clinical significant difference, MCID)和实际临床获益(substantial clinical benefit, SCB)来确定临床改善程度。结果:平均年龄37.38岁,男性占66%。经过1年的随访,我们的患者在所有问卷中分别有75%和70%的人超过了MCID和SCB。然而,在5年的随访中,近70%和65%的患者分别超过了MCID和SCB,因此在中期产生了轻微的恶化。结论:我们证明关节镜治疗脊柱下撞击是有效的。然而,需要更大的样本量和更长的随访期来分析长期结果,以证明这种治疗方法是“金标准”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arthroscopic treatment of hip subspinous impingement: a real clinical improvement in the midterm?

Background: There is a limited literature available describing the various diagnostic modalities and treatment options for the management of subspine impingement (SSI). We developed a study to evaluate the clinical improvement at 1 year and 5 years, with iHOT 33 and HOS hip scores.

Questions: (1) Do patients with subspine compression improve with arthroscopic treatment clinically at short-term follow-up (1 year); (2) Is the improvement maintained in the mid-term (5 years)?

Methods: 43 young patients (21-65 years) with subspine compression (prominent anterior inferior iliac spine) treated arthroscopically between January 2010 and December 2021 were included. Patients completed the iHOT33, HOS-SPORT and HOS-ADL questionnaires before surgery, 1 year and 5 years follow-up. We evaluated pre- and postoperative differences at 1 year and at 5 years. Minimum clinically significant difference (MCID) and the substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were used to establish clinical improvement.

Results: Mean age was 37.38 years and 66% were males. Almost 75% and 70% of our patients exceed the MCID and the SCB respectively in all the questionnaires after 1 year follow-up. However, at 5 years follow-up, nearly 70% and 65% of the patients exceeded MCID and SCB respectively, therefore producing a slight worsening in the medium term.

Conclusions: We demonstrate that arthroscopic treatment of subspine impingement is effective. However, larger sample size and longer follow-up period are necessary to analyse long-term results to demonstrate this treatment as the "gold standard".

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信