下颌阻生第三磨牙冠切除术后牙根移位1例。

Q3 Medicine
General dentistry Pub Date : 2025-09-01
Gustavo Henrique Souza Silva, Enzo Balestrero, Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli, Pâmela Leticia Santos
{"title":"下颌阻生第三磨牙冠切除术后牙根移位1例。","authors":"Gustavo Henrique Souza Silva, Enzo Balestrero, Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli, Pâmela Leticia Santos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronectomy is recommended for third molars that require extraction and are located near the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) or the mandibular base. The procedure is aimed at reducing the risk of complications, but root migration is among the possible sequelae of this surgical technique. This report describes 3 clinical cases of root migration after coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. All 3 cases involved women aged 21 to 31 years and followed the surgical principles recommended for the technique: local anesthesia, periodontal ligament detachment, pericoronal ostectomy, sectioning of the dental crown, and crown removal with complete elimination of enamel from the roots, which remain impacted below 3 mm of bone. The patients were followed up with clinical and imaging examinations for 1 year. Panoramic radiographs at 1 year revealed root migration of 3 to 5 mm. None of the patients opted for removal of the residual root fragments because they were not causing any pain. Root migration after coronectomy cannot be perceived as a failure of this relatively safe alternative to extracting mandibular third molars near the IAN because the root always moves away from the nerve and usually causes no additional symptoms. Secondary surgery to remove the residual root should only be performed if migration results in root exposure, pain, or infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":12571,"journal":{"name":"General dentistry","volume":"73 5","pages":"54-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Root migration after coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars: case reports.\",\"authors\":\"Gustavo Henrique Souza Silva, Enzo Balestrero, Jéssica Lemos Gulinelli, Pâmela Leticia Santos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Coronectomy is recommended for third molars that require extraction and are located near the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) or the mandibular base. The procedure is aimed at reducing the risk of complications, but root migration is among the possible sequelae of this surgical technique. This report describes 3 clinical cases of root migration after coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. All 3 cases involved women aged 21 to 31 years and followed the surgical principles recommended for the technique: local anesthesia, periodontal ligament detachment, pericoronal ostectomy, sectioning of the dental crown, and crown removal with complete elimination of enamel from the roots, which remain impacted below 3 mm of bone. The patients were followed up with clinical and imaging examinations for 1 year. Panoramic radiographs at 1 year revealed root migration of 3 to 5 mm. None of the patients opted for removal of the residual root fragments because they were not causing any pain. Root migration after coronectomy cannot be perceived as a failure of this relatively safe alternative to extracting mandibular third molars near the IAN because the root always moves away from the nerve and usually causes no additional symptoms. Secondary surgery to remove the residual root should only be performed if migration results in root exposure, pain, or infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General dentistry\",\"volume\":\"73 5\",\"pages\":\"54-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如果第三磨牙位于下牙槽神经或下颌基部附近,需要拔除,建议采用冠状切除术。手术的目的是减少并发症的风险,但牙根移位是这种手术技术的可能后遗症之一。本文报告3例下颌阻生第三磨牙冠切除术后牙根移位的临床病例。所有3例患者均为21至31岁的女性,均遵循推荐的手术原则:局部麻醉、牙周韧带脱离、冠周截骨、牙冠切开术、牙冠移除术,并将牙根的牙釉质完全清除,牙根的牙釉质仍保留在3毫米以下。随访1年,进行临床及影像学检查。1年后的全景x线片显示根迁移3至5毫米。没有患者选择去除残留的根碎片,因为它们不会引起任何疼痛。冠状切除术后的牙根移动不能被认为是这种相对安全的替代方法的失败,因为牙根总是远离神经,通常不会引起额外的症状。只有当迁移导致根暴露、疼痛或感染时,才应进行二次手术切除残余根。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Root migration after coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars: case reports.

Coronectomy is recommended for third molars that require extraction and are located near the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) or the mandibular base. The procedure is aimed at reducing the risk of complications, but root migration is among the possible sequelae of this surgical technique. This report describes 3 clinical cases of root migration after coronectomy of impacted mandibular third molars. All 3 cases involved women aged 21 to 31 years and followed the surgical principles recommended for the technique: local anesthesia, periodontal ligament detachment, pericoronal ostectomy, sectioning of the dental crown, and crown removal with complete elimination of enamel from the roots, which remain impacted below 3 mm of bone. The patients were followed up with clinical and imaging examinations for 1 year. Panoramic radiographs at 1 year revealed root migration of 3 to 5 mm. None of the patients opted for removal of the residual root fragments because they were not causing any pain. Root migration after coronectomy cannot be perceived as a failure of this relatively safe alternative to extracting mandibular third molars near the IAN because the root always moves away from the nerve and usually causes no additional symptoms. Secondary surgery to remove the residual root should only be performed if migration results in root exposure, pain, or infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
General dentistry
General dentistry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: General Dentistry is the premier peer-reviewed journal of the Academy of General Dentistry (AGD). Published bi-monthly, General Dentistry presents research and clinical findings to support the full range of procedures that general dentists perform on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信